Arrest, Remand and the Custodial Statement
At 23:40 on a Friday, Constable A arrests Rahim, 29, at a roadside stall for a house-breaking theft reported three days earlier; a neighbour's CCTV still shows a man in a red helmet carrying a laptop bag. Rahim is brought to the district lock-up at 00:25. At 09:00 the investigating officer (IO), Sergeant Tan, learns Rahim has no lawyer and has said he 'wants to tell the truth'. The IO plans to record a confession statement at 10:30, then apply for remand under s.117 Criminal Procedure Code. Rahim's sister arrives at 11:00 with a lawyer. The 24-hour period from arrest expires at 23:40. The lock-up register shows Rahim was given food at 07:00 but no medical attention; he has a fresh cut on his forehead he says came from falling at the stall. The IO's remand application is listed for 15:00, and the magistrate's court closes at 16:30. A public holiday follows the next day.
1. Should Sergeant Tan record the confession at 10:30? Explain the lawful sequence and the risks.
Read the worked answer
No. A statement taken by an investigating officer in custody is not a routine confession. Sections 25 and 26 Evidence Act 1950 exclude confessions to police officers and confessions made in police custody unless made to a magistrate; the s.25A exception does not cover a Sergeant and does not cure involuntariness. The fresh forehead cut, the absence of medical attention and the lawyer's arrival at 11:00 make a voluntariness challenge almost certain. The correct sequence is: (1) arrange an immediate medical examination and photograph the injury; (2) allow the lawyer to consult Rahim under s.28A CPC unless a delay is documented and authorised; (3) record only a cautioned statement in the proper form, noting the time, persons present and any request for counsel; (4) do not promise bail or release in exchange for a statement. If Rahim insists on speaking, record his words verbatim, avoid leading questions, and stop if he asks for a lawyer. The remand application can still proceed at 15:00, but the medical and counsel issues must be disclosed to the magistrate.
2. What should the IO put before the magistrate at 15:00, and what should he avoid?
Read the worked answer
Apply under s.117 CPC for remand, but the application must be honest and particularised. The 24-hour period expires at 23:40, so 15:00 is within time. The grounds are recovery of the laptop bag, identification of the red-helmet suspect, and prevention of contact with the reported neighbour. Flight risk is moderate: Rahim was arrested at a stall near his home, not at a border. The IO must disclose the forehead injury and that no medical officer has seen him; ask the magistrate to order a medical examination and note the counsel request. Do not ask for four days as a matter of course; ask for the shortest period needed and a review. If no magistrate is available before 23:40, release on police bail or produce him at the next sitting; do not hold him over the public holiday without authority. The cut also requires a custodial-injury report to the superior, because it will be raised at trial.
3. The lawyer demands access at 11:00. How should the IO respond?
Read the worked answer
Allow the lawyer to see Rahim at 11:00, in sight but out of hearing, and record the time. Section 28A CPC gives a detained person the right to consult counsel; delay is permitted only where it would impede the investigation, and that reason must be recorded and authorised. Here the IO's real need is to get a statement before the lawyer arrives-that is not a legitimate reason to delay. After consultation, ask whether Rahim wishes to say anything; if he does, record it with the lawyer present or note a waiver. Do not ask Rahim to repeat his 'want to tell the truth' remark in front of the lawyer as a trap. Any statement obtained before access will be attacked as unfair and may be excluded. The lawyer's presence also protects the IO against later allegations of inducement.