Replacing Daniel's Whole Life After a Diabetes Diagnosis
Daniel, 47, and his wife Kim, 45, have two children aged 12 and 9. At 38 Daniel bought a whole-life policy: $500,000 death benefit, $9,800 annual premium, with the dividend option set to pay premiums. Current cash value is $78,000. Three years ago he borrowed $22,000 against the policy at 7.4% variable for a home deposit; the loan is still outstanding and unpaid interest is capitalising. In 2021 he was diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes (A1c 7.1%, metformin only) and obstructive sleep apnoea treated with CPAP. His father died of a heart attack at 61. A new agent proposes surrendering the policy and buying $1.5m of 30-year term for about $2,300 a year, 'investing the $7,500 difference'. The family needs cover until the mortgage clears in 18 years and the youngest finishes university in 13 years. Group cover at work is two times salary ($210,000) and ends at retirement.
1. Is replacement in Daniel's interest? State what must be verified before any surrender, and give your recommendation.
Read the worked answer
Replacement is not automatically wrong: a 30-year term policy at $2,300 for $1.5m may genuinely fit a 13-18 year need better than a $500,000 permanent policy. But the burden of proof sits with the replacement.
Insurability first. With diabetes, sleep apnoea and a father who died of a heart attack at 61, Daniel is likely to be rated or declined for $1.5m. Nothing should be surrendered until a new policy is issued, delivered and the first premium paid. If he died during the new policy's contestability period, the insurer could rescind, and the $78,000 cash value and $500,000 death benefit would already be gone. At minimum, wait out the contestability period on the new cover before releasing the old.
Like-for-like comparison. $500,000 permanent plus $1m term is not the same product as $1.5m of term. Compare the guaranteed death benefit, the cash value and its growth, the loan interest, and the fact that term expires at 77, exactly when mortality risk and any estate liquidity need peak.
Costs of surrender. The $22,000 loan is repaid from the $78,000 cash value, leaving $56,000. Premiums paid are roughly $88,000, so basis probably exceeds cash value and there may be no taxable gain, but this must be computed from the insurer's in-force illustration, not assumed. Check surrender charges by policy year.
'Invest the difference' is a projection resting on 30 years of discipline at an assumed return, not a guarantee.
Recommendation: keep the existing policy, service the loan, and add level term to cover the mortgage and university gap.
2. How should the $22,000 policy loan be handled, and what are the tax consequences if he does surrender?
Read the worked answer
The loan is the urgent item. At 7.4% variable it costs $1,628 a year and compounds against the policy. If it is not serviced, unpaid interest capitalises and can eventually force the policy to lapse, at which point any gain becomes taxable. The dividend option was switched away from paying premiums, which slows cash value growth; that is precisely the mechanism by which 'borrow and forget' policies fail.
Handling: repay the loan from the emergency fund or a cheaper source, and keep the policy's cash value intact. If liquidity is tight, at least restore the dividend option so the loan stops growing, and set a target date for repayment. Never let a policy loan sit through a market downturn, because a lapse then crystallises a tax bill at the worst possible moment.
Tax on surrender. The gain is cash value minus investment in the contract, where investment in the contract is premiums paid less dividends received and any prior withdrawals. At roughly nine years of $9,800 premiums, basis is probably close to or above $78,000, so surrender would likely produce little or no ordinary income, and the insurer would issue a 1099-R. But the loan is included in the calculation: if cash value includes the loan and basis is lower than assumed, part of the loan can be treated as a deemed distribution. Obtain a written in-force illustration with the basis figures before signing anything.
3. Assume the new insurer declines him or rates him heavily. What changes?
Read the worked answer
Everything changes, and the decision becomes straightforward.
Keep the existing $500,000 whole life regardless. It is now the only individually underwritten permanent cover he will ever obtain, and it is already in force and past contestability. Do not lapse it, do not borrow further against it, and do not reduce the death benefit.
Shop the term market properly. Insurers treat controlled diabetes with an A1c of 7.1% very differently: some will offer standard rates at 20 years for $1m. Use informal, no-name enquiries before a formal application so a declination is not recorded and disclosed on future applications.
Fill the gap with the cover he can get. Group cover of $210,000, a mortgage decreasing term policy, and cover on Kim, who is the more likely caregiver if something happens to her.
Consider riders before new underwriting. A term rider or paid-up additions on the existing policy often requires limited or no underwriting and can raise the death benefit without a new policy.
Revisit in 12 months. An A1c below 7.0% with documented CPAP compliance can move him down one or two rating classes. The gap between now and then should be covered with what is available today, not with hope.