IPO Allocation and Sequential Block Trade
You are head of compliance at a fund management firm. A broker allocated 2 million shares in an oversubscribed IPO. The portfolio manager gave 1.5 million shares to the Flagship Growth Fund, which pays a 20% performance fee and drives his bonus, and 500,000 to the Balanced Income Fund, even though both funds have a 3% target position in the sector and similar NAV. Separately, the manager bought 500,000 shares for Fund A at 2.10, then 300,000 for Fund B at 2.14 twenty minutes later because the broker had limited inventory. Fund B had a pending order for 300,000 at 2.20. The investment committee approved both trades after the fact. The firm's allocation policy says orders are aggregated and allocated pro rata. A junior analyst has raised a whistleblowing concern.
1. Identify the conduct issues in the IPO allocation and the block trade.
Read the worked answer
The IPO allocation is not pro rata and the difference tracks the PM's pay: Flagship pays a 20% performance fee and drives his bonus, while Balanced has a similar mandate, sector target and NAV. Unless there is a documented, objective reason such as different investment restrictions, that is preferential treatment and a conflict of interest. The block trade is also problematic: Fund B had a pending order at 2.20, yet Fund A bought first at 2.10 and Fund B later at 2.14. Sequential allocation can favour one client; the firm's own policy requires aggregation and pro-rata allocation at an average price. After-the-fact investment committee approval does not cure the breach. Both episodes raise the duty to act in clients' best interests, fair treatment and the need to manage personal conflicts. The whistleblower's concern is credible and should be investigated independently.
2. What remediation and controls should compliance recommend?
Read the worked answer
Remediation should be concrete: recalculate the IPO allocation pro rata or reallocate the excess; compensate the disadvantaged fund for the price difference on the block trade; and review the PM's other trades for a pattern. Compliance should report to the board and, where required, to the regulator. Controls: pre-trade allocation rules, aggregation of block orders with average pricing, an order management system that timestamps allocations, removal of PM discretion over IPO allocations where conflicts exist, and disclosure of performance-fee conflicts. The whistleblower must be protected from retaliation and the investigation documented. Training alone is not enough; the firm should test whether the allocation policy was followed in prior deals and whether after-the-fact approvals are routine. The aim is to restore fair treatment, not just to discipline one individual.