Lodge charter request and PPL privileges
An owner of a private guest lodge near the Namibian escarpment asks a PPL holder to fly three lodge guests from Windhoek Eros to the lodge's private gravel strip in a Cessna 172. The lodge owner says he will pay for all fuel and landing fees and add N$2,000 'for your time'. The pilot's licence is current, the Class 2 medical is valid for four months, the aircraft's certificate of airworthiness expires in three weeks, and the next maintenance inspection is due in 12 flight hours. The planned flight is 1.4 hours each way, and the strip is 900 m long at 4,800 ft elevation with a rising approach. The pilot has not flown into the strip before. The passengers have no aviation connection to the pilot. The pilot is tempted because the trip would build hours.
1. May the pilot accept the fuel, landing fees and N$2,000 payment under a Namibian PPL? Explain the licensing logic.
Read the worked answer
No. A PPL is a private licence: the holder may not operate an aircraft for reward or hire, and may not carry passengers for remuneration. Payment of fuel and landing fees plus N$2,000 'for your time' is reward, not cost sharing. The lodge is effectively buying a commercial air service, which requires a CPL or higher and an air operator certificate, together with the appropriate aircraft maintenance and insurance arrangements. Accepting would also risk invalidating insurance if the policy excludes commercial carriage. A PPL holder may share direct costs only when all occupants contribute pro rata, no profit is made and the flight is not held out to the public. Here the guests are not sharing the cost; the lodge is paying the pilot. The correct decision is to refuse the payment, or operate entirely at the pilot's own cost with no reward.
2. Which pilot and aircraft documents or validities would you verify before accepting, and which items in the setup could make the flight illegal or unairworthy?
Read the worked answer
Verify the licence and Class 2 medical, type/class rating, recent experience and passenger-carrying recency, and the pilot's personal fitness. For the aircraft, check certificate of registration, certificate of airworthiness, maintenance release and inspection status, mass and balance, insurance, radio station licence and any deferred defects. Confirm the private strip owner's permission and the strip condition. In the setup, the C of A expiring in three weeks is acceptable if the flight is completed before expiry; the maintenance inspection due in 12 flight hours is acceptable for a 2.8-hour return only if no other inspection or airworthiness directive falls due and no defect exists. The lack of previous experience into the 900 m rising strip is a risk factor requiring a performance and approach assessment, not automatically illegal. The decisive legal problem is the payment, not the documents.
3. If the pilot instead flew with all four occupants sharing direct costs equally, would that change the answer? State the conditions.
Read the worked answer
It could change the answer, but only if the arrangement is genuine cost sharing. All four occupants must contribute equally to direct costs such as fuel, oil, landing and parking fees; the pilot must pay the pilot's own share; no payment may be made for the pilot's time or profit; and the flight must not be advertised or held out to the public. If the lodge pays the guests' shares, or if the pilot's share is waived, the flight becomes reward carriage and is not permitted on a PPL. Keep a simple record of the calculation and receipts so the pro rata nature can be demonstrated. The aircraft and pilot must still meet all document, maintenance, insurance and recency requirements.