Pregnant Girls, Policy and Practice in Zambezi
Zambezi Region, Namibia. At a combined school, 22% of girls in Grades 8–11 dropped out during one academic year; 14 became pregnant. The school's written re-entry policy allows pregnant learners to return after giving birth, but only three did. The nearest clinic is 35 km away and youth-friendly services are available two afternoons a week, staffed by one nurse. Teachers say the girls 'lose interest', while girls report travelling long distances, lacking money for transport, and fear of being shamed by teachers and classmates. Boys' dropout is linked to cattle herding and seasonal fishing. The school has no female science teacher and few female teachers in senior grades. Community leaders oppose distributing condoms at school, and some parents say pregnancy is a matter for the family, not the school. The regional education director wants a plan that improves both girls' completion rates and adolescent health outcomes.
1. Explain why a re-entry policy on its own has not improved girls' completion in this school. Identify supply-side and demand-side barriers.
Read the worked answer
A re-entry policy creates a formal entitlement, but completion depends on whether girls can actually use it. The scenario shows supply-side and demand-side barriers.
Supply side: the nearest clinic is 35 km away and youth services open only two afternoons a week with one nurse - so contraception, antenatal care and postnatal care are hard to obtain. The school has no female science teacher and few women in senior grades, so girls lack role models and trusted adults. There is no childcare or transport support, and teachers' comment that girls 'lose interest' suggests stigma rather than an explanation.
Demand side: households are poor; transport costs and the opportunity cost of schooling matter. Girls fear being shamed by teachers and classmates, which raises the cost of returning. Community leaders oppose condom distribution and some parents see pregnancy as a family matter, so the school's authority is contested.
The policy therefore changes the formal rule but not the capability to return. Only three of 14 returned because the return path is physically, financially and socially difficult. Implementation - clinic hours, transport, teacher attitudes, childcare - is the binding constraint.
2. Analyse the links between education, health and gender equality in this scenario. Use at least two examples.
Read the worked answer
Education, health and gender inequality reinforce each other.
Example one: health affects education. A pregnancy ends a school year; distance to the clinic and limited services increase the chance of poor maternal health and of repeat pregnancy, both of which reduce the chance of returning. Boys' herding and fishing work also affects attendance, showing that livelihood pressures shape schooling for both sexes, but girls face an additional biological and social risk.
Example two: education affects health. Girls with secondary education tend to delay marriage and childbirth, use health services more, and earn more. When 22% of girls drop out, the next generation's health is also affected, because maternal education is one of the strongest predictors of child survival and nutrition. The lack of female science teachers also discourages girls from science subjects, which limits later access to health professions and better-paid work.
Example three: gender norms mediate both. Teachers' blaming language, community opposition to condoms and parents' view that pregnancy is private all shape whether a girl can seek care and return. The result is a cycle: low education reduces bargaining power, which sustains norms that limit education.
Policy must therefore address the three together; a clinic alone will not keep girls in school if stigma remains, and a campaign alone will not help a girl who has no transport.
3. Recommend a package of two interventions for the regional director and explain how you would measure whether it is working.
Read the worked answer
Package:
A school-linked adolescent health service: a mobile youth clinic visiting weekly, with a female nurse, contraception and antenatal referrals, plus a female mentor teacher and a transport allowance for girls who need to attend. Childcare support - a small crèche or a childcare bursary - should be available for returning mothers. This addresses the supply barriers and makes re-entry feasible.
A community and teacher engagement programme: training for teachers on non-discrimination and the re-entry policy, and structured dialogue with traditional leaders and parents, including men, about adolescent health. This addresses stigma and the demand-side constraints. Condom distribution should be negotiated with leaders rather than imposed, to avoid a backlash that closes the clinic.
Why both: the clinic without community acceptance will be underused, and acceptance without services will not prevent pregnancy or support return. Together they change both supply and demand.
Measurement: baseline and annual data on (a) re-entry and completion rates by sex, (b) repeat pregnancy among returning learners, (c) clinic visits by adolescents, (d) a short stigma survey of learners and teachers, and (e) attendance. Compare with a similar school without the package where possible. Success should be judged by completion, not only by the number of pregnancies, so that girls are not blamed for a system failure.