Rhetorical question and concessive in a dam opinion piece
A 220-word opinion piece in a school magazine discusses a proposed dam on a seasonal river. The writer, a livestock farmer, begins by describing the dry riverbed and then says: 'If the committee had come to the river last year, would they still call it a dam site?' Later: 'It is not that we reject development; it is that we reject being spoken for.' The piece ends with a proverb glossed in the margin as 'the pot breaks at the handle', used after a sentence about the weakest households. A candidate answers the comprehension question 'Does the writer support the dam?' with 'No, because the writer says they reject development and the river is dry.' The candidate also says the proverb means the pot is old. The teacher must give feedback and a revised answer. The passage uses a concessive construction and a rhetorical question.
1. Diagnose the candidate's error and explain how the rhetorical question and the concessive sentence should be read.
Read the worked answer
The candidate has picked out two content words, 'reject' and 'development', and ignored the contrastive frame 'not that … it is that …'. That frame concedes the first point in order to deny it: the writer does not reject development in principle; the objection is to a process in which local people are not consulted. The candidate has also read the rhetorical question as a plain statement about the dry river. A rhetorical question here invites the reader to infer that the committee never visited the site, so its judgement is uninformed. A revised answer should say something like: 'The writer is not simply opposed to the dam. They doubt the committee's process and object to decisions being made without local voice; the dry riverbed is evidence that the committee did not inspect the site.' The lesson is to read concession markers and question form as argument structure, not as isolated vocabulary.
2. What does the proverb contribute to the argument, and how should a candidate handle a proverb they do not know?
Read the worked answer
The marginal gloss gives the literal image: the pot breaks at the handle, that is, failure comes at the weakest point. In context, the sentence before it concerns the weakest households, so the proverb condenses the claim that the dam's costs will fall on those least able to bear them. It is not a comment on the age of the pot. A candidate who does not know a proverb should use three clues: the immediate sentence, the paragraph's argument, and any gloss or repetition. Here the gloss plus 'weakest households' is enough to infer function. The candidate should then test the inference against the writer's overall stance. If the proverb is genuinely opaque, the safe move is to say what it is doing structurally ('it seals the warning about unequal costs') rather than invent a literal meaning. Proverbs are persuasive summaries, not decorative additions.
3. Identify one feature that makes this an opinion piece rather than a news report, and explain why the distinction matters for answering comprehension questions.
Read the worked answer
The first-person farmer's perspective is the clearest feature: the writer speaks as an affected community member, uses evaluative description of the dry riverbed, asks a rhetorical question, and closes with a proverb. A news report would normally attribute claims to named sources and avoid a first-person stance and proverbial closure. The distinction matters because comprehension questions about 'support' depend on genre. In a news report, a quoted objection would not necessarily be the reporter's view; in an opinion piece, the stance is the writer's own. The candidate's error came partly from treating a concessive argument as a simple statement of fact. A useful habit is to underline stance markers-'not that', 'it is that', rhetorical questions, proverbs-before answering. Then the answer can distinguish opposition to the project from opposition to the process, which is the writer's actual position.