A Student Asked to Interpret Bad News
At a parents' evening, a hearing teacher asks a 16-year-old Deaf student to interpret for a 20-minute meeting with a Deaf parent about the parent's child's repeated absences and a possible suspension. No qualified interpreter is available. The student knows the family, is friendly with the child, and has interpreted informal conversations before. The meeting will include confidential attendance records, a disagreement about whether the absences were illness-related, and a request for the parent to sign a consent form. The student is fluent in NSL and written English but has no interpreting training. The teacher says, 'Just tell them what I say.' The student is unsure whether to agree, and the parent has already started asking the student personal questions about the child.
1. Identify the main ethical and practical problems if the student agrees to interpret.
Read the worked answer
The main problems are:
- Dual role and conflict of interest: the student is friendly with the child and knows the family. They cannot easily remain neutral when the topic is the child's possible suspension.
- Confidentiality: attendance records and a disagreement about illness are sensitive. A student is not covered by an interpreter's professional confidentiality framework in the same way.
- Accuracy and completeness: the student has no training in consecutive interpretation, role boundaries or handling overlapping speech. 'Just tell them what I say' is not a safe instruction.
- Power imbalance: the parent may treat the student as a family friend and ask personal questions, while the teacher may treat the student as a neutral channel.
- Consent form: explaining a formal consent form requires precise legal and educational meaning, not informal paraphrase.
The student should not simply agree because no one else is available.
2. What alternatives should the student and teacher pursue before or during the meeting?
Read the worked answer
Before the meeting, the teacher should try to:
- contact a qualified interpreter or a Deaf adult with interpreting experience, even by phone or video;
- reschedule the meeting if the suspension decision is not urgent;
- ask whether another trained staff member can interpret;
- provide the parent with the key information in written English and offer a follow-up meeting with an interpreter.
If the meeting must proceed, the student can agree to a strictly limited role: not interpret the consent form, not answer personal questions about the child, and pause the meeting if confidentiality or accuracy is at risk. The teacher should speak directly to the parent, not to the student, and should allow time for clarification. The student should say clearly, 'I can help with basic communication, but I am not a qualified interpreter and I cannot advise you about your child.'
3. How should the student respond in the moment when the parent asks personal questions?
Read the worked answer
The student should redirect without taking on the interpreter's authority. A useful response is to interpret the question accurately to the teacher, then add a boundary statement in NSL: 'I am here to help with communication, not to give advice about your child. Please ask the teacher.'
The student should not answer on the teacher's behalf, soften the suspension information, or use their friendship with the child to influence the parent. If the parent becomes distressed or the discussion moves to the consent form, the student should stop and ask the teacher to arrange a qualified interpreter or a written explanation. The teacher should then speak directly to the parent and document that the meeting was continued without a qualified interpreter. This protects the parent's access, the student's role and the accuracy of the record.