Detox Only, Two Children, and a Shelter Bed
A 29-year-old woman, Tanya, presents for intake with daily fentanyl use for four months and one overdose reversed with naloxone three weeks ago. She has two children, ages 3 and 7, lives in a shelter, and has no childcare. She says, 'I just need detox for a week, then I'm done-I can't do that methadone stuff because it's trading one drug for another.' She has Medicaid, no primary care, and a pending child-protection investigation. She works part-time at a warehouse with rotating shifts.
1. What treatment-planning priorities and measurable objectives would you propose, and how would you sequence them?
Read the worked answer
Sequence by risk first, then stability, then recovery supports:
- Overdose prevention now: naloxone kit, overdose education, never-use-alone plan. Measurable: client demonstrates naloxone use and identifies two people who can respond.
- Withdrawal management and medication evaluation: same-day or next-day medical/opioid treatment program assessment. Measurable: completed evaluation within 48 hours.
- Child safety and shelter coordination: release-based contact with child protection and shelter; measurable: documented childcare plan for treatment appointments.
- Engagement and education about MAT: measurable: client attends one education session and states two options and their risks/benefits.
- Employment stabilization: measurable: schedule-adjusted appointment plan within one week.
Reasoning: a plan that begins with 'attend 90 meetings' ignores a recent overdose and a child-protection deadline. Priorities must reflect imminent harm and concrete barriers.
2. How do you respond to her 'detox only' preference while maintaining fidelity to evidence-based care?
Read the worked answer
Use motivational interviewing rather than correction:
- Reflect the value behind her statement: 'You want to be done and not swap one dependence for another.'
- Ask permission to share information about overdose risk after detox and about buprenorphine/methadone as treatment, not replacement.
- Explore her prior experience and fears about MAT; ask what would make medication worth trying for even 30 days.
- Offer a menu: detox with a clear discharge plan and naloxone, medication evaluation, or both.
- If she still declines MAT, document informed choice, provide overdose prevention, and schedule early follow-up. Do not discharge her from care for refusing medication.
Reasoning: autonomy and evidence can coexist. The therapist's job is to make the safer option accessible and to document the conversation, not to coerce.
3. What service coordination is needed, and what release limitations apply?
Read the worked answer
Coordinate with:
- Medical/opioid treatment provider for withdrawal and MAT evaluation.
- Shelter for appointment logistics and safety planning.
- Child protection within the legal mandate, sharing only required information.
- Employer only if needed for schedule accommodation and only with a specific release.
Use separate, time-limited releases that name each party and the information to be shared. A general agency release may not authorize child-protection or employer disclosures. Document what was shared, with whom, and why. If child protection requests information without a release, follow state law and consult a supervisor before responding.
Reasoning: coordination fails when releases are too broad or too vague; it also creates ethical risk when the counselor shares more than the minimum necessary.