NALA ACP Trial Practice flashcards
NALA ACP Trial Practice · Build recall with a focused review session.
32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- Jury demand deadline
- Under FRCP 38(b), a written jury demand must be served no later than 14 days after service of the last pleading directed to the issue; failure waives the right under FRCP 38(d).
- Rule 26(a)(3) pretrial disclosures
- Requires disclosure of witnesses, deposition designations, and exhibits at least 30 days before trial, with objections due 14 days after the disclosure; inapplicable to nonjury trials absent a court order.
- Hearsay definition
- An out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, as defined in FRE 801(c); it is generally inadmissible unless an exception or exclusion applies.
- Non-hearsay uses
- Out-of-court statements offered not for truth but for effect on the listener, impeachment, or as verbal acts with independent legal significance are not hearsay under FRE 801(c).
- Best evidence rule
- FRE 1002 requires the original writing, recording, or photograph to prove its content; secondary evidence is allowed only when an exception in FRE 1003 or 1004 applies.
- Authentication standard
- FRE 901(a) requires evidence sufficient to support a finding that the item is what the proponent claims, such as testimony of a witness with knowledge or distinctive characteristics.
- Leading questions
- Under FRE 611(c), leading questions are generally barred on direct examination but permitted on cross-examination and for preliminary matters, hostile witnesses, or adverse parties.
- Witness sequestration
- Under FRE 615, the court must exclude witnesses on request so they cannot hear other testimony, but may not exclude parties, party officers or employees, or essential persons.
- Offer of proof
- When evidence is excluded, FRE 103(a)(2) requires counsel to make known the substance of the evidence by offer or avowal to preserve the error for appeal.
- Rule 50(a) motion
- A motion for judgment as a matter of law may be made after the opposing party has been fully heard on an issue and before the case is submitted to the jury.
- Rule 50(b) renewal
- If the court denies a Rule 50(a) motion, the movant may renew it after judgment within 28 days; failure to move under 50(a) generally bars a 50(b) motion.
- Rule 51 instruction objections
- Parties may request jury instructions and must object on the record before the jury is charged; untimely objection forfeits appellate review except for plain error.
- Batson challenge
- A party may object to a peremptory strike as race-based; the objector makes a prima facie showing, and the striking party must then offer a race-neutral explanation.
- J.E.B. v. Alabama
- This decision extended Batson's prohibition on discriminatory peremptory strikes to strikes exercised on the basis of gender during jury selection.
- Opening statement scope
- An opening statement outlines what counsel expects the evidence will show; it is not evidence itself, and argument on the facts is generally reserved for closing.
- Trial notebook components
- A trial notebook typically contains a case summary, witness and exhibit lists, voir dire questions, opening outline, direct and cross outlines, jury instructions, and verdict form.
- Subpoena for trial testimony
- Under FRCP 45, a subpoena commands attendance at a stated time and place; nonparties may be compelled with witness fees and mileage tendered, and party officers must be subpoenaed.
- Exhibit list contents
- An exhibit list records each exhibit's number, description, sponsoring witness, authentication method, and any objection, and is exchanged before trial under pretrial disclosure rules.
- Direct examination purpose
- Direct examination elicits the sponsoring witness's personal knowledge and foundation for exhibits and testimony, using non-leading questions except for preliminary or hostile matters.
- Cross-examination scope
- Under FRE 611(b), cross-examination should not go beyond the subject matter of direct examination and matters affecting credibility, though the court may allow wider inquiry.
- Refreshing recollection
- Under FRE 612, a witness may use a writing to refresh memory; adverse counsel may inspect it, and the court may order production of related writings.
- Past recollection recorded
- FRE 803(5) permits reading a recorded recollection into evidence when the witness once had knowledge but now cannot recall, the record was made when fresh, and accuracy is shown.
- Present sense impression
- FRE 803(1) excepts from hearsay a statement describing or explaining an event made while or immediately after the declarant perceived it.
- Excited utterance
- FRE 803(2) excepts a statement relating to a startling event made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event.
- Business records exception
- FRE 803(6) admits records of a regularly conducted activity made at or near the time by someone with knowledge, kept in the course of business, unless the source or method lacks trustworthiness.
- Public records exception
- FRE 803(8) admits records of public offices setting out activities, matters observed under legal duty, or factual findings from authorized investigations, subject to limits in criminal cases.
- Impeachment by prior statement
- FRE 613 permits examining a witness about a prior inconsistent statement; extrinsic evidence requires an opportunity to explain or deny, with exceptions for opposing party statements.
- Prior consistent statement
- FRE 801(d)(1)(B) treats as non-hearsay a declarant's prior consistent statement offered to rebut a charge of recent fabrication or improper influence or motive.
- Verdict form
- A verdict form presents the jury's findings; a general verdict states the outcome, while a special verdict requires findings on each factual issue under FRCP 49.
- Judgment notwithstanding verdict
- The older term for renewed judgment as a matter of law under FRCP 50(b), granted when no reasonable jury could find for the nonmoving party on the record.
- Motion in limine
- A pretrial motion asking the court to exclude or admit evidence before trial, preserving objections and preventing prejudicial evidence from reaching the jury.
- Rule 403 balancing
- Under FRE 403, relevant evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by unfair prejudice, confusion, misleading the jury, delay, or needless cumulative evidence.