C-RETS study materials
C-RETS study resources

Section 1031 Exchange: Debt Replacement, DSCR, and Identification Timing

C-RETS · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Section 1031 Exchange: Debt Replacement, DSCR, and Identification Timing

An investor is selling a 24-unit apartment building for $4.2 million. The adjusted basis is $2.1 million, the existing mortgage is $2.5 million, and selling costs are $180,000. The realized gain before tax is approximately $1.92 million. The investor wants a Section 1031 exchange into a $6.0 million NNN retail property with $420,000 NOI. A lender quotes 6.75%, 25-year amortization, and a 1.30x minimum DSCR. The investor has only the net sale proceeds available for equity and wants to replace the debt dollar-for-dollar. The 45-day identification period and 180-day closing period are running, and the retail seller requires a 30-day closing after identification. The investor has identified the retail property as the sole replacement and does not want to add cash. The investor asks whether the exchange can close as structured, what the maximum loan is, and what changes are required.

1. Calculate net equity, the debt replacement requirement, and whether the exchange can close as structured without adding cash.

Read the worked answer
  • Net equity from sale: $4,200,000 − $180,000 − $2,500,000 = $1,520,000.
  • Old debt to replace: $2,500,000.
  • To buy the $6.0 million property with $1.52 million equity, the required loan is $6,000,000 − $1,520,000 = $4,480,000.
  • At 6.75%, 25-year amortization, the annual payment constant is about 0.08292. Debt service on $4.48 million would be about $371,500.
  • DSCR: $420,000 ÷ $371,500 = 1.13x, below the 1.30x minimum.

The debt replacement test is not the problem: even the maximum supportable loan will exceed $2.5 million. The problem is equity. The investor cannot close the $6.0 million purchase with only $1.52 million equity and a loan that satisfies the lender’s DSCR. The exchange cannot close as structured without adding cash, reducing price, or changing loan terms.

2. Calculate the maximum loan under the 1.30x DSCR and the maximum purchase price with available equity. What does this imply?

Read the worked answer
  • Maximum annual debt service: $420,000 ÷ 1.30 = $323,077.
  • Maximum loan: $323,077 ÷ 0.08292 ≈ $3,896,000.
  • Maximum purchase price with $1.52 million equity: $3,896,000 + $1,520,000 = $5,416,000.
  • Equity gap at $6.0 million: $6,000,000 − $3,896,000 − $1,520,000 = $584,000.

The implied cap rate at $6.0 million is 7.0%, while the debt constant is about 8.29%. That is negative leverage: the loan costs more than the property yields, so every dollar of debt reduces cash flow. To close without new cash, the price would need to fall to roughly $5.4 million, or the lender would need to offer interest-only coverage. An interest-only loan at 6.75% on $4.48 million would have debt service of $302,400 and DSCR of 1.39x, but the investor must confirm the loan is bona fide and qualifies for exchange purposes.

3. What exchange-timeline and identification risks must be managed, and what is your recommendation?

Read the worked answer

The investor must identify replacement property within 45 days of closing and close within 180 days, or by the tax return due date if earlier. Identifying only one property is risky because if the retail deal fails, the exchange fails and the $1.92 million gain becomes taxable. The 30-day closing requirement after identification compresses diligence and financing.

Recommendation:

  • Identify up to three properties, including backups, before day 45 rather than waiting until the deadline.
  • Use a qualified intermediary and confirm no constructive receipt of proceeds.
  • Re-trade the retail price to about $5.4 million, add at least $584,000 cash, or secure an interest-only loan that satisfies DSCR.
  • Complete environmental, lease, and estoppel diligence during the identification period, not after.

If the investor cannot close the equity gap or secure backup properties, the safer course may be to pay the tax rather than force a bad leveraged acquisition. The exchange deferral is valuable, but it does not cure negative leverage.