I85PREP
⌘ K
CMSP study materials
CMSP study resources

CMSP practice questions

One question at a time. Build your CMSP understanding.

First 50 of 200 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.

Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.

Question 1Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

Which document of a medical staff organization typically grants the medical staff the authority to organize itself and adopt bylaws?

  1. The board-approved medical staff bylaws Correct answer.
  2. The nursing department's policy manual
  3. The hospital's annual operating budget
  4. The state health department's licensure certificate

Explanation

Medical staff authority to self-govern is delegated by the governing body and codified in the medical staff bylaws, which the board approves. The bylaws define structure, appointment, privileging, and due process. Other documents do not confer medical staff governance authority.

Question 2Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

In medical staff governance, what is the primary purpose of the credentialing process?

  1. To verify qualifications and eligibility for appointment and privileges Correct answer.
  2. To assign call schedules for the emergency department
  3. To set the annual dues owed to the medical staff
  4. To determine the physician's compensation tier

Explanation

Credentialing verifies education, training, licensure, certification, and performance data so the organized medical staff can recommend appointment and privileges. It is a verification and evaluation function, not a financial or scheduling one. Compensation and call schedules are separate administrative matters.

Question 3Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

A physician requests renewal of privileges at the standard two-year reappointment cycle. Which activity is required before the medical staff recommends reappointment?

  1. A documented reappraisal of credentials and performance data Correct answer.
  2. A new residency program completion certificate
  3. A focused professional practice evaluation of every procedure performed
  4. A repeat of the initial appointment interview with the entire board

Explanation

Reappointment requires reappraisal of the practitioner's credentials and performance, including quality and clinical data, since the prior appointment. It is a periodic evaluation, not a repeat of initial credentialing from scratch. Focused evaluation is triggered by specific concerns or new privileges, not routinely for all procedures.

Question 4Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

Which element is essential to a fair hearing and appeal process in medical staff bylaws?

  1. Notice of the adverse action and the reasons for it Correct answer.
  2. A hearing before a panel that includes the practitioner's business partner
  3. A requirement that the practitioner prove innocence first
  4. A closed proceeding with no record kept

Explanation

Due process requires timely written notice of the adverse recommendation and the specific reasons, plus a fair opportunity to respond. The practitioner must be able to present evidence and challenge the basis for the action. Proceedings should be documented, and panel members must be free of conflicts.

Question 5Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

The medical executive committee recommends denial of privileges based on documented clinical concerns. Which body typically holds final authority to act on that recommendation?

  1. The state medical board
  2. The credentials committee alone
  3. The organized medical staff as a whole
  4. The governing body of the hospital Correct answer.

Explanation

The governing body retains ultimate authority for appointment and privileging decisions, acting on medical staff recommendations. The organized medical staff evaluates and recommends, but the board is accountable for the final decision. The credentials committee only reviews and forwards recommendations.

Question 6Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

What distinguishes a proctoring requirement from a focused professional practice evaluation (FPPE)?

  1. Proctoring replaces the need for any performance data
  2. Proctoring is a permanent condition of appointment
  3. FPPE applies only to physicians over age 65
  4. Proctoring is a form of monitoring that may be used to fulfill FPPE for new privileges Correct answer.

Explanation

Proctoring is one monitoring method that can be used during FPPE when a practitioner obtains new privileges. FPPE is a defined period of evaluation with established triggers and metrics. Proctoring is time-limited and tied to the evaluation, not a permanent status.

Question 7Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

Which statement best describes the relationship between medical staff bylaws and hospital-wide medical staff policies?

  1. Bylaws apply only to the medical executive committee
  2. Policies may override bylaws when approved by nursing leadership
  3. Policies must be consistent with and implement the bylaws Correct answer.
  4. Bylaws are subordinate to any department policy

Explanation

Bylaws establish the governing framework, and policies, rules, and regulations must align with and operationalize them. A policy that conflicts with the bylaws is invalid to that extent. Bylaws apply across the organized medical staff, not just its leadership.

Question 8Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

A medical staff member resigns while an investigation into clinical competence is pending. How should the bylaws typically treat this resignation?

  1. It must be accepted immediately and the investigation closed
  2. It may be reported to the data bank as a resignation during investigation Correct answer.
  3. It requires the physician to forfeit licensure
  4. It automatically restores privileges if the physician returns

Explanation

Resignations or relinquishments while under investigation may require reporting to the National Practitioner Data Bank to protect future patients and institutions. The bylaws usually address how such departures are characterized and reported. They do not automatically erase the pending concern.

Question 9Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

Which committee is generally responsible for reviewing practitioner applications and making credentialing recommendations to the medical executive committee?

  1. The pharmacy and therapeutics committee
  2. The infection prevention committee
  3. The quality improvement council
  4. The credentials committee Correct answer.

Explanation

The credentials committee performs primary verification and review of applications and forwards recommendations to the medical executive committee. Quality, pharmacy, and infection committees address other clinical functions. Credentialing review is a distinct governance responsibility.

Question 10Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

A hospital's bylaws require that a practitioner be a member of the medical staff to vote at staff meetings. A practitioner holds privileges but was never granted membership. What is the correct conclusion?

  1. The practitioner automatically becomes a member after one year
  2. The practitioner may vote because privileges imply membership
  3. The practitioner may vote only on privileging matters
  4. The practitioner may not vote because membership was not granted Correct answer.

Explanation

Membership and privileges are distinct categories; holding clinical privileges does not by itself confer staff membership. Voting rights follow from the membership status defined in the bylaws. Automatic conversion after a set time is not implied unless the bylaws say so.

Question 11Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

Which of the following best characterizes an exclusive contract for a hospital service such as radiology?

  1. It is prohibited by accreditation standards
  2. It eliminates the need for medical staff bylaws
  3. It may limit privileges in that service to contracted practitioners Correct answer.
  4. It requires that all qualified staff be granted privileges in that service

Explanation

An exclusive contract with a service group may lawfully limit privileges in that service to contracted practitioners, provided the arrangement is board-approved and applied consistently. The medical staff bylaws and due process still apply to affected practitioners. Exclusive contracts are permitted when properly structured.

Question 12Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

When a practitioner's privileges are summarily suspended, what must occur next under standard medical staff bylaws?

  1. The suspension continues indefinitely without review
  2. The practitioner must be terminated from employment
  3. The suspension requires prior approval by the full medical staff
  4. The practitioner is entitled to a prompt review after the immediate action Correct answer.

Explanation

Summary suspension is an immediate action taken when patient safety is at risk, and it must be followed promptly by review and a hearing opportunity. The practitioner retains due process rights after the emergency action. The suspension is not a final determination.

Question 13Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

Which data source is most relevant when evaluating a practitioner's ongoing clinical performance at reappointment?

  1. The practitioner's undergraduate grade point average
  2. The number of hospital committees the practitioner has joined
  3. Peer review and quality metrics tied to the practitioner's privileges Correct answer.
  4. The practitioner's social media following

Explanation

Reappraisal relies on objective performance information such as peer review, quality measures, and clinical outcomes relevant to the privileges held. These data demonstrate current competence. Unrelated personal or social information is not a valid basis.

Question 14Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

A bylaws provision states that any amendment requires a two-thirds vote of the medical staff and governing body approval. A department chair attempts to change the provision by department vote. Is this valid?

  1. No, because amendments must follow the stated process in the bylaws Correct answer.
  2. No, because bylaws can never be amended
  3. Yes, if the change is supported by a majority of the department
  4. Yes, because department chairs have inherent amendment authority

Explanation

Bylaws specify the exclusive procedure for amendment, and changes must follow that process, including required votes and board approval. A department cannot unilaterally alter the governing document. Bylaws are amendable, but only through the prescribed mechanism.

Question 15Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

Which concept describes a practitioner's right to notice, an opportunity to be heard, and a decision by an impartial body before adverse action takes effect?

  1. Privileging
  2. Peer review protection
  3. Credentialing
  4. Due process Correct answer.

Explanation

Due process is the constitutional and bylaws-based guarantee of fair procedure before adverse action. It includes notice, hearing, and an impartial decision-maker. Credentialing and privileging are substantive processes, while peer review protection concerns legal immunity for reviewers.

Question 16Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

A practitioner applies for a new high-risk procedure. The department chair wants to grant privileges immediately. What does a sound bylaws framework generally require?

  1. Approval by the state medical board before any privileging
  2. Denial until the practitioner completes a second residency
  3. Verification of training and experience with FPPE during an initial period Correct answer.
  4. Immediate permanent privileges based on the chair's judgment alone

Explanation

New privileges require verification of current competence and typically a period of focused professional practice evaluation. The evaluation confirms the practitioner can perform the procedure safely. Granting permanent privileges without verification or monitoring is inconsistent with sound governance.

Question 17Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

Which body typically adopts the medical staff bylaws subject to governing body approval?

  1. The hospital finance department
  2. The organized medical staff Correct answer.
  3. The human resources department
  4. The state licensing agency

Explanation

The organized medical staff drafts and adopts its bylaws, which then require governing body approval to become effective. This reflects the shared authority between the medical staff and the board. Administrative departments do not adopt medical staff bylaws.

Question 18Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

A physician's clinical privileges are reduced after a hearing. Which action is most consistent with bylaws requirements?

  1. The practitioner is told verbally with no documentation
  2. The reduction is kept confidential from the practitioner
  3. The practitioner is informed in writing of the decision and the appeal rights Correct answer.
  4. The reduction is applied retroactively to past cases

Explanation

Adverse privilege decisions require written notice that states the action, the reasons, and the available appeal rights. Documentation supports the fairness and reviewability of the process. The practitioner must know the decision to exercise appeal rights.

Question 19Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

What is the function of the medical executive committee in the governance structure?

  1. It sets hospital reimbursement rates
  2. It acts for the organized medical staff between meetings and makes recommendations to the board Correct answer.
  3. It manages the hospital's capital budget
  4. It licenses new physicians in the state

Explanation

The medical executive committee is the executive arm of the organized medical staff, acting between staff meetings and forwarding recommendations to the governing body. It addresses credentialing, privileging, and quality matters. It does not perform licensing, budgeting, or rate-setting functions.

Question 20Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

A practitioner is denied reappointment because of a single unresolved patient complaint. Which principle is most at risk?

  1. The hospital's right to set parking fees
  2. The practitioner's obligation to attend staff meetings
  3. The board's authority to approve the budget
  4. The requirement for an objective, documented evidentiary basis for adverse action Correct answer.

Explanation

Adverse actions must rest on an objective, documented basis that the practitioner can review and contest. A single unresolved complaint, without more, may not support denial and undermines fairness. The other options are unrelated to the decision.

Question 21Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

Which statement about allied health professional (AHP) appointment is generally accurate?

  1. AHPs are exempt from any credentialing review
  2. AHPs automatically receive the same privileges as physicians
  3. AHPs may set their own scope without oversight
  4. AHPs are credentialed and privileged under a process defined in medical staff bylaws or policy Correct answer.

Explanation

Allied health professionals are appointed and privileged through a defined process, often specified in medical staff bylaws or a separate AHP policy. Their scope is established and overseen by the medical staff and board. They are not exempt from credentialing.

Question 22Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

Which of the following is the best example of a conflict of interest that should disqualify a hearing panel member?

  1. A panelist who serves on a different hospital committee
  2. A panelist who has published research in the same specialty
  3. A panelist who attended the same medical school
  4. A panelist who is a direct economic competitor of the practitioner Correct answer.

Explanation

A direct economic competitor has a personal stake in the outcome that undermines impartiality. Fair hearings require decision-makers free from bias or conflicting interests. Shared specialty, training, or unrelated committee service does not by itself create disqualifying bias.

Question 23Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

A medical staff member believes a bylaws provision is being applied inconsistently by the credentials committee. What is the most appropriate first step under typical governance structures?

  1. Ask the nursing staff to override the committee
  2. Raise the concern through the medical staff's internal review or appeal channels Correct answer.
  3. File a lawsuit against the hospital immediately
  4. Ignore the issue because bylaws are unenforceable

Explanation

Internal governance provides review and appeal channels that should be exhausted before external action. Raising the concern through established medical staff processes allows consistent interpretation and correction. Bypassing those channels undermines the governance framework.

Question 24Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

Which document typically defines the specific clinical services a practitioner is authorized to perform?

  1. The medical staff meeting minutes
  2. The hospital's marketing brochure
  3. The privilege delineation list approved for that practitioner Correct answer.
  4. The practitioner's employment contract alone

Explanation

The privilege delineation identifies the specific procedures and services a practitioner is authorized to perform. It is approved through the credentialing process and reflects verified competence. Employment contracts and marketing materials do not define clinical authorization.

Question 25Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

A hospital seeks to add a new category of medical staff membership with limited voting rights. What is required?

  1. A vote of the hospital's patients
  2. Approval by the state medical board
  3. A bylaws amendment following the prescribed adoption process Correct answer.
  4. A verbal agreement among department chairs

Explanation

Creating a new membership category changes the governance structure and requires a bylaws amendment through the prescribed process, including medical staff vote and board approval. Informal agreements cannot create membership categories. External agencies and patients have no role in this decision.

Question 26Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

A hospital's medical staff bylaws are silent on whether the medical executive committee may act on a credentials application when the credentials committee has not yet met. Which principle governs how the medical executive committee should proceed?

  1. It may act only within authority the bylaws and governing body grant, and silence is not a grant of authority. Correct answer.
  2. It may act freely because the medical executive committee is the supreme governing body of the hospital.
  3. It may act only after the governing body votes on each individual application.
  4. It may act because the credentials committee's role is advisory and can always be bypassed.

Explanation

Medical staff bylaws are the controlling charter for medical staff self-governance, and the medical executive committee derives its powers from those bylaws as approved by the governing body. Where the bylaws are silent, the committee cannot assume implied authority to skip a required review step; the proper course is to follow the documented process or seek a bylaws amendment.

Question 27Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

Under typical medical staff bylaws, which category of practitioners is generally appointed through a separate allied health professional process rather than as full medical staff members?

  1. Podiatrists who perform surgery in the hospital
  2. Dentists who hold oral surgery privileges
  3. Physician assistants and nurse practitioners who provide patient care under defined scope arrangements Correct answer.
  4. Physicians who hold active admitting privileges

Explanation

Allied health professionals such as physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and other non-physician clinicians are usually credentialed and granted privileges through a distinct AHP appointment process defined in the bylaws or a related policy. Licensed independent practitioners like physicians, podiatrists, and dentists are typically eligible for medical staff membership in their own right.

Question 28Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

A practitioner requests privileges for a procedure the hospital has never offered, and no current staff member performs it. Which action is most consistent with sound bylaws and credentialing practice?

  1. Delegate the decision entirely to the practitioner's department colleagues without documentation.
  2. Deny the request outright because new services can never be added to the privilege list.
  3. Verify training and current competence through focused evaluation, then grant privileges only if the hospital can support the service safely. Correct answer.
  4. Grant the privileges provisionally because the practitioner holds a valid state license.

Explanation

Privileging is site-specific and competence-based, so a new procedure requires verification of the applicant's training and current experience plus confirmation that the hospital has the resources to support it safely. A state license establishes legal authority to practice but does not by itself demonstrate competence for a specific procedure. Bylaws and privilege lists can be amended to add new services when these conditions are met.

Question 29Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

Which statement best describes the standard relationship between the medical staff bylaws and the hospital's governing body?

  1. The governing body writes the bylaws and the medical staff has no role in drafting them.
  2. The bylaws are advisory documents that carry no enforceable obligations.
  3. The medical staff adopts bylaws that take effect subject to governing body approval. Correct answer.
  4. The bylaws take effect once the medical executive committee signs them, without further approval.

Explanation

Medical staff self-governance is exercised through bylaws that the medical staff adopts, but those bylaws become effective only with governing body approval, which preserves the governing body's ultimate accountability for hospital operations. This shared process is the standard structure in accredited hospitals.

Question 30Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

A hearing panel member has an active professional partnership with the practitioner whose privileges are being reviewed. What is the most appropriate action under fair hearing principles?

  1. The panel member may serve because clinical expertise outweighs personal relationships.
  2. The panel member should be recused and replaced by an alternate without a conflicting relationship. Correct answer.
  3. The panel member may serve but should abstain from the final vote only.
  4. The panel member may serve if the practitioner does not object at the outset.

Explanation

A fair hearing requires an impartial decision-maker, and a close financial or professional relationship with the affected practitioner creates an unacceptable conflict of interest. Recusal and substitution of an unconflicted alternate protects the integrity of the process and reduces the risk of a successful legal challenge. Waiver by the practitioner does not cure the structural bias in most bylaws frameworks.

Question 31Credentialing and Privileging

Under the CMS Provider Enrollment, Chain, and Ownership System (PECOS), which action is required when a Medicare-enrolled physician changes their practice location to a new state?

  1. Notify only the state medical board and continue billing under the old location
  2. Report the change only if the physician also changes their specialty designation
  3. Submit a new enrollment application or a change of information report within 30 days of the move Correct answer.
  4. Wait until the next scheduled revalidation cycle to report the new address

Explanation

A change of practice location is a reportable event in PECOS, and the enrolled provider must submit a change of information within 30 days of the effective date. Failing to report timely can result in deactivation of the Medicare billing privileges. Reporting only at revalidation or only to the state board does not satisfy the federal requirement.

Question 32Credentialing and Privileging

A hospital's medical staff bylaws must be approved by which body before they take effect?

  1. The hospital's governing body Correct answer.
  2. The state health department
  3. The Joint Commission
  4. The Medicare Administrative Contractor

Explanation

Medical staff bylaws are adopted by the organized medical staff and must be approved by the hospital's governing body, which retains ultimate authority over staff appointments and privileges. State agencies, MACs, and accreditors review compliance but do not approve the bylaws themselves.

Question 33Credentialing and Privileging

Which document typically authorizes a practitioner to perform specific procedures within a hospital and is granted by the governing body?

  1. Clinical privileges Correct answer.
  2. A DEA registration
  3. Board certification
  4. A state license

Explanation

Clinical privileges are the specific scope of practice a hospital's governing body grants to a practitioner based on documented competence. A license, DEA registration, and board certification are eligibility credentials, not grants of hospital-specific privileges.

Question 34Credentialing and Privileging

What is the primary purpose of primary source verification during the credentialing process?

  1. To satisfy marketing requirements for the provider directory
  2. To speed up the application by relying on the practitioner's attestation
  3. To replace the need for peer references
  4. To confirm credentials directly with the issuing or authoritative source Correct answer.

Explanation

Primary source verification confirms licensure, education, training, and board status directly with the issuing entity rather than through the applicant's self-report. This independent confirmation protects patient safety and supports accreditation and regulatory compliance.

Question 35Credentialing and Privileging

The National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) was established primarily to do which of the following?

  1. Issue hospital privileges to qualified practitioners
  2. Maintain the national registry of active medical licenses
  3. Collect and disclose adverse actions and malpractice payments involving practitioners Correct answer.
  4. Set national standards for continuing medical education

Explanation

The NPDB is a confidential information clearinghouse that collects reports of malpractice payments and certain adverse actions and makes them available to authorized queriers. It does not license, privilege, or set education standards.

Question 36Credentialing and Privileging

Which entity is responsible for surveying a hospital against the Medicare Conditions of Participation for deemed status purposes?

  1. The state medical board
  2. A CMS-approved accrediting organization such as The Joint Commission Correct answer.
  3. The NPDB
  4. The hospital's own quality committee

Explanation

Hospitals may receive deemed status when a CMS-approved accrediting organization surveys them and confirms compliance with requirements equivalent to the Conditions of Participation. Internal committees, medical boards, and the NPDB do not confer deemed status.

Question 37Credentialing and Privileging

A practitioner applies for reappointment. What is the standard maximum interval between reappointments commonly required by accreditation standards?

  1. Five years
  2. Seven years
  3. Two years Correct answer.
  4. Ten years

Explanation

Accreditation standards generally require reappraisal of a practitioner's credentials and privileges at least every two years. Longer intervals would not meet the periodic reappraisal expectation for ongoing competence review.

Question 38Credentialing and Privileging

Which of the following is a recognized category of clinical privilege commonly used by medical staff organizations?

  1. Admitting privileges Correct answer.
  2. Payroll privileges
  3. Billing privileges
  4. Marketing privileges

Explanation

Admitting privileges are a standard clinical privilege category that allows a practitioner to admit patients to the hospital. Billing, marketing, and payroll are administrative functions unrelated to the clinical privileging framework.

Question 39Credentialing and Privileging

A physician with an active, unrestricted license in one state applies for privileges at a hospital in a different state where the physician is not licensed. What is the most appropriate credentialing determination?

  1. The physician may practice under the hospital's corporate license
  2. The out-of-state license is sufficient because licensure is national
  3. The hospital may grant temporary privileges indefinitely without a state license
  4. The application cannot be approved until a license in the hospital's state is obtained Correct answer.

Explanation

Licensure is state-specific, and a hospital may only privilege practitioners licensed in the state where the facility operates. An out-of-state license does not authorize practice at the new facility. Hospitals do not hold licenses that cover individual practitioners.

Question 40Credentialing and Privileging

During credentialing, a verification of a practitioner's board certification is received from the certifying board's online directory. Which statement best characterizes this verification?

  1. It is acceptable primary source verification because the board is the authoritative source Correct answer.
  2. It requires a second verification from the practitioner's employer
  3. It is unacceptable because only mailed letters count as primary source
  4. It is unnecessary if the practitioner lists certification on a CV

Explanation

The certifying board is the authoritative source for its own certification status, so a direct query to the board or its official directory satisfies primary source verification. Mailed letters are not the only acceptable method, and CV entries are self-reported.

Question 41Credentialing and Privileging

A hospital grants temporary privileges to a new practitioner while the full application is processed. Which condition is most consistent with accreditation expectations for temporary privileges?

  1. A documented urgent patient care need or a complete application awaiting final approval, with verification of key credentials Correct answer.
  2. Temporary privileges may be granted for up to one year without verification
  3. Temporary privileges eliminate the need for a full credentialing file
  4. Temporary privileges may be granted solely at the department chair's discretion without documentation

Explanation

Temporary privileges are limited to defined situations such as an urgent need or a complete application awaiting final decision, and core credentials must still be verified. They are time-limited and do not replace the full credentialing process.

Question 42Credentialing and Privileging

A hospital receives notice that a physician's license has been summarily suspended by the state board. What is the most appropriate immediate action regarding the physician's clinical privileges?

  1. Allow the physician to practice under supervision without changing privileges
  2. Summarily suspend or restrict the privileges pending a hearing, consistent with bylaws Correct answer.
  3. Refer the matter to the NPDB and take no local action
  4. Continue privileges until the next scheduled reappointment

Explanation

Loss of licensure removes the legal basis for practice, and medical staff bylaws typically authorize summary suspension of privileges when a practitioner's license is suspended. The action should be documented and followed by the fair hearing process, and it may trigger an NPDB report.

Question 43Credentialing and Privileging

Which of the following best describes the purpose of the focused professional practice evaluation (FPPE)?

  1. To review hospital-wide quality metrics for the board
  2. To replace the ongoing professional practice evaluation permanently
  3. To evaluate a practitioner's competence during a defined period, such as when new privileges are granted Correct answer.
  4. To determine physician compensation

Explanation

FPPE is a time-limited evaluation used when a practitioner is newly privileged or when a question about competence arises, and it uses defined performance indicators. It complements, rather than replaces, ongoing professional practice evaluation.

Question 44Credentialing and Privileging

A credentialing specialist discovers that a practitioner's malpractice history includes a settled claim. Which statement about NPDB querying is correct?

  1. Hospitals may query the NPDB only when a complaint is filed
  2. Hospitals query the NPDB only if the practitioner consents in writing each time
  3. Hospitals must query the NPDB at initial appointment and reappointment Correct answer.
  4. Hospitals are prohibited from querying the NPDB for reappointment

Explanation

Hospitals are required to query the NPDB at the time of initial appointment and at reappointment to review reported malpractice payments and adverse actions. Querying is not limited to complaint situations and does not require repeated individual consent.

Question 45Credentialing and Privileging

Which of the following is typically required before a medical staff committee recommends privileges for a new applicant?

  1. Membership in the local medical society
  2. Verification of current licensure, relevant training, and current competence Correct answer.
  3. Agreement to accept a specified patient volume
  4. Payment of the applicant's professional liability premium

Explanation

Privileging decisions rest on verified licensure, education and training, and evidence of current competence. Professional society membership, premium payment, and volume commitments are not standard prerequisites for privilege recommendations.

Question 46Credentialing and Privileging

A practitioner requests a new privilege that the hospital has never granted before. What is the most appropriate first step in the privileging process?

  1. Conduct a documented review of the practitioner's training and experience specific to the requested privilege Correct answer.
  2. Ask the practitioner to obtain the privilege at another facility first
  3. Deny the request automatically because the hospital has no precedent
  4. Grant the privilege provisionally and review it at the next reappointment

Explanation

Requests for new privileges require a documented evaluation of the practitioner's specific training and experience, often through a focused review or proctoring plan. Automatic denial or provisional granting without review does not meet credentialing standards.

Question 47Credentialing and Privileging

Which statement accurately reflects the relationship between the organized medical staff and the governing body in privileging decisions?

  1. The medical staff recommends and the governing body grants privileges Correct answer.
  2. The governing body recommends and the medical staff grants privileges
  3. The medical staff grants privileges without governing body involvement
  4. Both bodies must unanimously agree for every privilege

Explanation

The medical staff evaluates credentials and recommends practitioners for appointment and privileging, while the governing body holds final authority to grant privileges. This division of responsibility is a core principle of medical staff organization.

Question 48Credentialing and Privileging

An applicant has a history of a license restriction that was later fully reinstated. How should the credentialing committee treat this information?

  1. Deny privileges automatically based on the past restriction
  2. Ignore it because the license is now unrestricted
  3. Report it to the NPDB as a new adverse action
  4. Review the circumstances, remediation, and current status as part of a documented assessment Correct answer.

Explanation

A past restriction is relevant credentialing information that warrants documented review of the circumstances, remediation, and current licensure status. Automatic denial or ignoring the history would not reflect an individualized assessment, and the committee does not create a new NPDB report for a prior action.

Question 49Credentialing and Privileging

Which of the following best describes the purpose of ongoing professional practice evaluation (OPPE)?

  1. To monitor practitioner performance continuously using data to confirm continued competence Correct answer.
  2. To replace the reappointment process entirely
  3. To evaluate only practitioners who have malpractice claims
  4. To set hospital-wide strategic goals

Explanation

OPPE uses ongoing performance data to confirm that a practitioner's competence supports continued privileging between reappointments. It informs but does not replace reappointment, and it applies to all privileged practitioners regardless of claims history.

Question 50Credentialing and Privileging

A hospital discovers that a practitioner practiced for two weeks after their license expired but before renewal was processed. Which action best reflects appropriate privileging and reporting follow-up?

  1. Quietly adjust the credentialing file dates to avoid scrutiny
  2. Report the practitioner to the state medical board only
  3. Take no action because the license was eventually renewed
  4. Investigate, take privileging action as bylaws allow, and evaluate whether an NPDB report is required Correct answer.

Explanation

Practicing on an expired license is a serious credentialing event that requires investigation and appropriate privileging action under the bylaws. The hospital must also assess whether the circumstances meet NPDB reporting criteria for an adverse action. Altering records or taking no action is improper.