CMSP study materials
CMSP study resources

CMSP study plan

CMSP · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 6 hours per week

Week 1

Credentialing and Privileging

  • Map the full credentialing and privileging workflow from initial application through reappointment, naming each decision point and the body or role that acts at it

  • Differentiate initial appointment, reappointment, and focused and ongoing professional practice evaluation triggers in writing, with one worked example of each

  • Build a personal glossary of at least 40 credentialing terms, including allied health professional, delineation of privileges, and temporary privileges

  • Identify which primary source verification elements must be independently confirmed versus accepted from a credentials verification organization

Your checkpoint

A one-page credentialing process flow diagram with decision points, responsible parties, and a 40-term glossary

Week 2

Credentialing and Privileging & Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws

  • Draft a sample appointment recommendation memo that applies medical staff bylaws criteria to a hypothetical applicant with a gap in practice

  • Compare how bylaws, medical staff rules and regulations, and department rules divide authority over appointment, privileging, and corrective action

  • Explain the role of the governing body versus the medical executive committee in appointment and privilege decisions

  • Practice applying fair hearing and appeal rights to two short scenarios involving adverse privileging decisions

Your checkpoint

A written appointment recommendation memo plus a two-column table separating governing body, medical executive committee, and department chair authority

Week 3

Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws & Peer Review and Professional Practice Evaluation

  • Outline the required elements of medical staff bylaws, including appointment criteria, corrective action, and hearing procedures

  • Distinguish peer review from professional practice evaluation and describe how each feeds the other

  • Design a focused professional practice evaluation plan for a newly privileged practitioner, specifying triggers, data sources, and timeframes

  • Explain how ongoing professional practice evaluation data are selected and reported to the medical executive committee

Your checkpoint

A focused professional practice evaluation plan template with triggers, metrics, review intervals, and reporting lines

Week 4

Peer Review and Professional Practice Evaluation & Regulatory and Accreditation Compliance

  • Write peer review case summaries that separate findings of fact from conclusions and avoid conclusory language

  • Match accreditation standards for peer review and practitioner competence to the internal processes that satisfy them

  • Identify the most commonly cited compliance gaps in medical staff credentialing and peer review and describe the evidence surveyors expect

  • Explain how external benchmark data and specialty society standards inform privilege criteria

Your checkpoint

Three de-identified peer review case summaries with a standards crosswalk table linking each process step to a compliance expectation

Week 5

Regulatory and Accreditation Compliance & Risk Management and Legal Issues

  • Summarize the legal protections and limits of peer review confidentiality in your jurisdiction, including what must be produced in litigation

  • Differentiate negligent credentialing exposure from corporate negligence and describe the documentation that defends against each

  • Explain how the Health Care Quality Improvement Act framework and the National Practitioner Data Bank reporting obligations interact with internal peer review

  • Identify antitrust and due process risks in medical staff decision-making and describe procedural safeguards that reduce them

Your checkpoint

A two-page legal risk brief covering peer review protection, negligent credentialing, data bank reporting, and due process safeguards

Week 6

Patient Safety and Quality Improvement & Peer Review and Professional Practice Evaluation

  • Translate peer review findings into measurable quality improvement aims with baseline, target, and owner

  • Apply a structured improvement method such as plan-do-study-act to one practitioner-level performance problem

  • Describe how patient safety event reports and root cause analyses should route into practitioner evaluation without bypassing confidentiality protections

  • Explain how culture of safety survey results and just culture principles shape how medical staff services handles error reporting

Your checkpoint

A one-page improvement charter applying plan-do-study-act to a practitioner performance issue, with baseline, target, measures, and reporting path

Week 7

Medical Staff Services Operations and Information Management & Credentialing and Privileging

  • Map the data fields a credentialing information system must track and describe the audit trail and access controls needed to protect them

  • Design a credentialing file audit using a sampling method and a scored checklist

  • Explain how expirables management, primary source verification documentation, and privileging databases prevent lapses in licensure and certification

  • Describe retention, security, and release-of-information rules that apply to credentialing and peer review records

Your checkpoint

A credentialing file audit tool with sampling plan, scored checklist items, and a remediation pathway for deficiencies

Week 8

Medical Staff Governance and Bylaws & Peer Review and Professional Practice Evaluation & Regulatory and Accreditation Compliance & Patient Safety and Quality Improvement & Risk Management and Legal Issues & Medical Staff Services Operations and Information Management

  • Synthesize all seven domains into a single integrated process map from appointment through ongoing evaluation and reappointment

  • Complete timed practice sets weighted to the two heaviest domains and review every missed item to its underlying rule or standard

  • Recite from memory the required elements of bylaws, the peer review cycle, and the reporting obligations covered in week 5

  • Build a personal list of the 20 facts you most often miss and a memorization strategy for each

Your checkpoint

A final integrated one-page process map plus a scored practice test log with a remediation note for every missed item

Milestones

Week 2: Can explain, without notes, the difference between appointment and privileging and who decides each

Week 4: Can write a peer review summary that states findings without conclusions and cite the standard each process step satisfies

Week 6: Can describe how a safety event becomes a practitioner evaluation action while preserving peer review protections

Week 8: Scores at or above 80 percent on a timed mixed-domain practice set and can list the 20 most-missed facts from memory