Recurrent curtain over the right eye in a 64-year-old
Mr. R is a 64-year-old retired teacher with a 12-year history of hypertension and a 30-pack-year smoking history. He schedules a routine contact lens follow-up and mentions, almost in passing, that twice this week a gray curtain descended over his right eye for 4–6 minutes before clearing completely. One episode occurred while he was watching television; the other began when he stood up quickly from his desk. He has no pain, redness, or photopsia. He has used artificial tears for dry eye for 3 years and assumed the episodes were related. Review of systems is notable for jaw fatigue while chewing steak and a mild left-sided headache over the past month. Best-corrected acuity is 20/20 in each eye, pupils are equal without an APD, and IOP is 16 mmHg OD and 15 mmHg OS. The fundus has not yet been examined through a dilated pupil.
1. Which elements of the history most strongly separate amaurosis fugax from dry-eye blurring, and what additional questions would you ask?
Read the worked answer
The description is much more concerning for transient monocular visual loss than for dry eye. Amaurosis fugax is typically abrupt, monocular, brief (seconds to minutes), often described as a curtain or shade, and resolves completely. Dry-eye blur is usually bilateral, burning or gritty, variable with blinking and environment, and improves with artificial tears. I would clarify onset and duration, whether vision is totally lost or merely blurred, whether the episode is altitudinal, relation to posture, exercise, or bright light, and whether recovery is complete. I would ask about diplopia, dysarthria, weakness, numbness, dizziness, palpitations, chest pain, and recent neck manipulation. The jaw claudication and new headache in a patient over 50 raise concern for giant cell arteritis, so I would ask about scalp tenderness, temporal artery tenderness, fever, weight loss, polymyalgia symptoms, and visual loss in the fellow eye. I would also review all medications and cardiovascular risk factors. These details change the urgency and the workup.
2. What is your immediate disposition and what will you document?
Read the worked answer
This is a same-day urgent problem, not a dry-eye flare. Transient monocular visual loss is a TIA equivalent and requires urgent evaluation for carotid or cardiac embolic source and for giant cell arteritis. I would arrange same-day ophthalmology or emergency department evaluation, check blood pressure in both arms and pulse, and ask about neurologic symptoms. Because of jaw claudication and headache, I would also arrange urgent ESR and CRP and, per local protocol, same-day corticosteroid treatment if GCA is suspected; this should not wait for a routine follow-up. I would not simply increase artificial tears. Documentation should include the patient's verbatim description, duration and frequency, cardiovascular risk factors, review of systems, medications, visual acuity, pupillary findings, IOP, and the exact advice given. I would record that the patient was warned to seek emergency care for persistent visual loss, weakness, facial droop, or speech difficulty, and I would document the referral and that the patient understood the plan.
3. How would you explain the plan to a patient who believes this is dry eye?
Read the worked answer
I would start by acknowledging that his dry eye is real and that his assumption was reasonable, then use plain language: “The brief curtain is not typical for dry eye. It can be a warning sign that a blood vessel or the circulation to the eye is temporarily blocked, and that is why I want you seen today rather than next month.” I would avoid saying “you are having a stroke,” which is frightening and not exactly what is happening, but I would be clear that it is a warning sign that needs urgent attention. I would explain that the jaw tiredness and headache also need checking. I would give written instructions, confirm understanding with teach-back, and state specifically when to call 911 or go to the emergency department. I would also arrange follow-up so he does not feel abandoned after the urgent referral.