Parachute Unit and a Student With Autism: Escape Behavior and Inclusion
In a second-grade class of 26, one student, Andre, has an IEP with a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder and goals for gross-motor participation and following a two-step direction. He participates in your 30-minute PE class with a one-to-one paraprofessional. The class is working on a parachute unit in the gym. When you blow the whistle to signal a rotation, Andre covers his ears, drops to the floor, and sometimes vocalizes loudly; the paraprofessional usually removes him to the hallway, where he misses 10-15 minutes of activity. The gym has poor acoustics, and the class includes 26 students, four large parachutes, and a music speaker. Andre's IEP team meets in three weeks, and the special education teacher asks you for data on his participation and for ideas to keep him in the gym. The principal is concerned about disruptions.
1. Analyze the antecedents and consequences maintaining Andre's behavior and explain why the current removal may be counterproductive.
Read the worked answer
The most likely pattern is escape maintained by the whistle and the surrounding sensory load. The whistle is a sudden, high-intensity sound in a reverberant gym; for a student with auditory sensitivity, it can function as an aversive antecedent. When Andre drops and vocalizes, the paraprofessional removes him to the hallway, which ends the noise and the demand to transition. That removal negatively reinforces the behavior: it works. It also removes him from 10-15 minutes of instruction, so the intervention is counterproductive for his IEP goals. I would not frame this as defiance or as autism behavior. I would collect antecedent-behavior-consequence data for two weeks, noting time of day, activity, noise level, proximity of peers, and who gave the cue. If the pattern holds, the first intervention is to change the antecedent by replacing the whistle with a visual or verbal cue before adding consequences. The goal is participation, not quiet compliance.
2. Propose at least four environmental or instructional modifications that could increase Andre's participation without isolating him, and explain the rationale for each.
Read the worked answer
Four modifications with rationale: (1) Replace the whistle with a consistent visual cue, such as lights off and on, a colored card, or a teacher hand signal, plus a verbal freeze and look. This removes the aversive sound and gives a predictable transition. (2) Pre-teach each rotation with a visual schedule and a two-minute warning; Andre can see what comes next, which reduces uncertainty. (3) Offer noise-reducing headphones as a voluntary tool, not a requirement, and reduce music volume; this lowers sensory load without isolating him. (4) Keep Andre in the gym and use a designated reset spot at the edge of the activity instead of hallway removal; he can rejoin in 30-60 seconds with a peer buddy. Also, assign him a consistent role in the parachute game, such as holding a handle next to a calm peer, and give one-step directions with a visual model. These changes preserve the least restrictive environment and keep him in the activity.
3. What data would you bring to the IEP meeting, and how would you determine whether the modifications are working?
Read the worked answer
I would bring baseline and intervention data: minutes of active participation per class, number of rotations completed, frequency and duration of loud vocalizations, number of adult prompts needed, and accuracy on his two-step direction goal. I would use a simple interval-recording sheet with 30-second intervals so the data are feasible during class. After 3-5 sessions with the modifications, I would compare baseline to intervention and look at the trend, not just the average. I would also note which supports were used and whether they could be faded. In the IEP meeting, I would present the data without labeling Andre, describe what worked, and ask the team whether the accommodations should be written into the IEP. The decision rule would be: if participation increases and vocalizations decrease, continue and fade the headphones or the reset spot; if not, request a functional behavioral assessment. I would also coordinate with the paraprofessional so we use the same cues and data definitions.