I85PREP
⌘ K
NC PT Juris study materials
NC PT Juris study resources

NC PT Juris practice questions

One question at a time. Build your NC PT Juris understanding.

First 50 of 200 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.

Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.

Question 1Civil Litigation and Procedure

In a North Pacific jurisdiction applying the standard civil-litigation limitation period, a plaintiff was injured on 3 March 2022 and filed suit on 1 September 2025. The defendant pleads the statute of limitations. Which period most plausibly bars the claim?

  1. A one-year limitation period, because personal-injury claims expire quickly
  2. A ten-year limitation period, because tort claims run from the injury date
  3. No limitation period applies, because personal-injury claims are imprescriptible
  4. A three-year limitation period, because more than three years elapsed before filing Correct answer.

Explanation

Where the applicable limitation period is three years, a claim accruing on 3 March 2022 is time-barred once suit is filed after 3 March 2025. The filing on 1 September 2025 therefore falls outside the period and the defense succeeds.

Question 2Civil Litigation and Procedure

A complaint is filed in the proper court but the defendant is never served with process. What is the usual procedural consequence?

  1. The action cannot proceed against that defendant until valid service is effected Correct answer.
  2. Service is unnecessary if the defendant has actual notice of the lawsuit
  3. The complaint is automatically dismissed with prejudice after filing
  4. The court may proceed to judgment because filing alone confers jurisdiction over the person

Explanation

Personal jurisdiction over a defendant generally requires valid service of process or voluntary appearance. Mere filing of a complaint does not bring the defendant before the court. The action therefore cannot proceed against an unserved defendant.

Question 3Civil Litigation and Procedure

A plaintiff wishes to sue a defendant who resides in another district where the claim arose. Which basis most directly supports venue in that other district?

  1. The district where the plaintiff's attorney is licensed
  2. The plaintiff's convenience in choosing counsel
  3. The district where the cause of action arose Correct answer.
  4. The district where the plaintiff maintains a bank account

Explanation

Venue rules typically permit suit where the defendant resides or where the events giving rise to the claim occurred. The place of accrual of the cause of action is a recognized venue basis. The plaintiff's convenience or counsel's location is not a venue criterion.

Question 4Civil Litigation and Procedure

A defendant receives a complaint and wishes to challenge the court's personal jurisdiction. What is the proper procedural step?

  1. File a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction before answering Correct answer.
  2. File a counterclaim and then object to jurisdiction at trial
  3. Ignore the complaint and raise the issue on appeal after default
  4. Ask the clerk to transfer the case without any motion

Explanation

A challenge to personal jurisdiction is ordinarily raised by a pre-answer motion or in the answer, before submitting to the court's authority. Failing to raise it in a timely manner can waive the objection. A motion to dismiss is the standard vehicle.

Question 5Civil Litigation and Procedure

Which document initiates a civil action and states the plaintiff's claims and requested relief?

  1. The answer
  2. The summons
  3. The subpoena
  4. The complaint Correct answer.

Explanation

The complaint is the pleading that commences the action and sets out the factual and legal basis for the claims and the relief sought. The summons notifies the defendant, the answer responds, and a subpoena compels testimony or documents.

Question 6Civil Litigation and Procedure

A party fails to respond to a properly served complaint within the required time. What is the plaintiff's usual remedy?

  1. File a motion to compel discovery
  2. Request a change of venue
  3. Move for a default judgment Correct answer.
  4. File a demurrer

Explanation

When a defendant does not appear or respond within the prescribed period, the plaintiff may seek a default judgment. This is the standard consequence of a failure to plead or appear. The other motions address unrelated procedural matters.

Question 7Civil Litigation and Procedure

Which standard governs a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim?

  1. Whether the complaint alleges facts sufficient to support a plausible claim for relief Correct answer.
  2. Whether the defendant has a complete defense as a matter of fact
  3. Whether the plaintiff can prove the claim beyond a reasonable doubt
  4. Whether the plaintiff has already conducted discovery

Explanation

A motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim tests the legal sufficiency of the complaint. The court asks whether the alleged facts, taken as true, support a plausible entitlement to relief. The plaintiff need not prove the claim at this stage.

Question 8Civil Litigation and Procedure

A plaintiff seeks an order requiring the defendant to produce documents relevant to the dispute. Which procedural device is appropriate?

  1. A motion for summary judgment
  2. A motion for a new trial
  3. A request for production of documents Correct answer.
  4. A motion to quash

Explanation

A request for production of documents is a discovery device by which a party seeks relevant, non-privileged materials from another party. Summary judgment, new trial motions, and motions to quash serve different purposes.

Question 9Civil Litigation and Procedure

A plaintiff sues a defendant in a court that lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over the type of claim asserted. What is the proper outcome?

  1. The court may decide the case if the parties consent
  2. The court may proceed if the defendant fails to object
  3. The court must dismiss the action because subject-matter jurisdiction cannot be waived Correct answer.
  4. The court may transfer the case to any court it chooses without a motion

Explanation

Subject-matter jurisdiction concerns the court's authority to hear a category of case and cannot be conferred by consent or waiver. A court lacking it must dismiss the action. Transfer is possible only where the rules authorize it.

Question 10Civil Litigation and Procedure

A defendant believes the complaint is vague and does not give fair notice of the claims. What motion is typically used to address this?

  1. A motion for a more definite statement Correct answer.
  2. A motion for remittitur
  3. A motion to compel arbitration
  4. A motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict

Explanation

A motion for a more definite statement asks the court to order a party to clarify a pleading that is so vague or ambiguous that a responsive pleading cannot reasonably be framed. The other motions operate at different stages of litigation.

Question 11Civil Litigation and Procedure

During discovery, a party withholds documents on the ground of attorney-client privilege. What must the withholding party generally do?

  1. Produce a privilege log identifying the withheld documents Correct answer.
  2. Ask the court to dismiss the case
  3. Produce the documents without redaction and waive privilege
  4. Destroy the documents to avoid disclosure

Explanation

A party asserting privilege over responsive documents ordinarily must provide a privilege log describing each withheld item so the opposing party and court can assess the claim. Silent withholding is improper. Destruction would constitute spoliation.

Question 12Civil Litigation and Procedure

A plaintiff moves for summary judgment. The defendant responds with an affidavit contradicting a material fact alleged by the plaintiff. How should the court rule?

  1. Grant summary judgment because affidavits are not evidence
  2. Dismiss the case for failure to state a claim
  3. Grant summary judgment because the plaintiff filed first
  4. Deny summary judgment because a genuine dispute of material fact exists Correct answer.

Explanation

Summary judgment is appropriate only when there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. A conflicting affidavit creating a factual dispute precludes summary judgment. The filing order of motions is irrelevant.

Question 13Civil Litigation and Procedure

A party fails to comply with a court order compelling discovery. Which sanction is within the court's authority?

  1. Awarding attorney fees to the noncompliant party
  2. Dismissing the action or entering default judgment against the noncompliant party Correct answer.
  3. Transferring the case to another judge automatically
  4. Imposing criminal imprisonment without a hearing

Explanation

Courts possess broad authority to sanction discovery violations, including dismissing the action or entering default judgment, excluding evidence, and awarding fees. Sanctions must be proportionate and imposed after notice and an opportunity to be heard.

Question 14Civil Litigation and Procedure

A defendant wishes to assert that the plaintiff's claim is barred because a prior lawsuit between the same parties resolved the same issue. Which doctrine applies?

  1. Lis pendens
  2. Res judicata, including claim preclusion Correct answer.
  3. Forum non conveniens
  4. Removal

Explanation

Res judicata prevents relitigation of claims or issues already decided by a final judgment between the same parties. Claim preclusion bars the same claim, while issue preclusion bars relitigation of decided issues. The other doctrines address venue and procedural transfer.

Question 15Civil Litigation and Procedure

A defendant seeks to have a case heard in a different court because the chosen forum is severely inconvenient and another forum is available. Which doctrine is invoked?

  1. Forum non conveniens Correct answer.
  2. Res judicata
  3. Collateral estoppel
  4. Certiorari

Explanation

Forum non conveniens allows a court to decline jurisdiction when trial in another available forum would better serve the interests of justice and convenience. It is distinct from preclusion doctrines and from appellate review mechanisms.

Question 16Civil Litigation and Procedure

A plaintiff serves interrogatories on the defendant. What is the defendant's obligation?

  1. Provide only documents, never written answers
  2. Answer each interrogatory fully under oath, subject to valid objections Correct answer.
  3. Respond only after the close of discovery
  4. Ignore the interrogatories unless the court orders a response

Explanation

Interrogatories are written questions that must be answered in writing and under oath within the prescribed time, unless a valid objection applies. A party may not simply ignore them. Objections must be stated with specificity.

Question 17Civil Litigation and Procedure

At trial, the plaintiff bears which burden regarding the elements of the claim?

  1. The burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt
  2. The burden of production only, never persuasion
  3. No burden, because the defendant must disprove the claim
  4. The burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence in most civil cases Correct answer.

Explanation

In most civil cases the plaintiff must prove each element of the claim by a preponderance of the evidence, meaning it is more likely than not. The burden of production and the burden of persuasion both typically rest on the plaintiff.

Question 18Civil Litigation and Procedure

A defendant fails to raise an affirmative defense in the answer and seeks to assert it for the first time at trial. What is the likely result?

  1. The court must grant a new trial
  2. The defense may be raised at any time without limitation
  3. The defense is automatically waived if not raised in the responsive pleading Correct answer.
  4. The defense converts into a counterclaim

Explanation

Affirmative defenses must generally be pleaded in the answer or raised by motion, and failure to do so can result in waiver. Late assertion is permitted only in limited circumstances, such as amendment or where the opposing party is not prejudiced.

Question 19Civil Litigation and Procedure

A party seeks to introduce a document at trial but the opposing party objects that it is hearsay. What must the offering party generally establish?

  1. That the document was produced during discovery
  2. That the document is authentic and falls within an exception or exclusion to the hearsay rule Correct answer.
  3. That the document was created by an attorney
  4. That the document is handwritten

Explanation

Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted and is generally inadmissible unless an exception or exclusion applies. The proponent must also authenticate the document. Discovery production alone does not resolve admissibility.

Question 20Civil Litigation and Procedure

A plaintiff obtains a money judgment and the defendant refuses to pay. Which step is available to enforce the judgment?

  1. An appeal of the judgment by the plaintiff
  2. A motion to dismiss the judgment
  3. Garnishment of the defendant's wages or bank account Correct answer.
  4. A new trial on the same claim

Explanation

Post-judgment enforcement mechanisms include garnishment, execution against property, and judgment liens. These allow the judgment creditor to collect the awarded sum. A prevailing plaintiff does not appeal its own judgment or seek a new trial.

Question 21Civil Litigation and Procedure

A defendant removes a case from state court to federal court. The plaintiff believes removal was procedurally defective because it was filed after the statutory deadline. What is the plaintiff's proper response?

  1. Seek a default judgment in state court
  2. File an answer in federal court and waive the defect
  3. Move to remand the case to state court Correct answer.
  4. File a counterclaim in state court

Explanation

A plaintiff challenging the propriety of removal may move to remand, and procedural defects in removal are generally waivable if not timely raised. The motion to remand returns the case to state court when removal was improper.

Question 22Civil Litigation and Procedure

A court is asked to apply the doctrine of collateral estoppel to a factual issue decided in a prior case. Which requirement is essential?

  1. The prior case was decided by a jury
  2. The prior case settled before trial
  3. The prior case involved the same attorneys
  4. The issue was actually litigated and necessarily decided in the prior action Correct answer.

Explanation

Collateral estoppel, or issue preclusion, requires that the issue was actually litigated, necessarily decided, and subject to a final judgment, and that the party against whom it is asserted had a full and fair opportunity to litigate. Identity of counsel is not required.

Question 23Civil Litigation and Procedure

A defendant moves to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, but the motion is denied. The defendant then answers and litigates the case to judgment, losing. On appeal, may the defendant renew the jurisdictional objection?

  1. No, because the defendant submitted to the court's jurisdiction by proceeding to litigate after the denial Correct answer.
  2. Yes, but only if the objection is raised in a post-trial motion
  3. Yes, because jurisdictional objections are never waived
  4. No, because the objection can only be raised after judgment

Explanation

A party that unsuccessfully challenges personal jurisdiction and then proceeds to defend on the merits may be treated as having submitted to the court's authority. To preserve the objection, the party must generally obtain interlocutory review or otherwise avoid submission.

Question 24Civil Litigation and Procedure

A plaintiff seeks to amend the complaint to add a new claim after the limitation period for that claim has expired. Under the relation-back doctrine, when will the amendment typically be permitted?

  1. Whenever the defendant consents to the amendment
  2. Only if the new claim is filed within one year of the original complaint
  3. When the new claim arises out of the same conduct, transaction, or occurrence set out in the original pleading Correct answer.
  4. Never, because expired claims cannot be added

Explanation

Relation back treats an amended pleading as filed on the date of the original pleading when the new claim arises from the same conduct, transaction, or occurrence. This allows otherwise time-barred claims to proceed if the defendant had notice of the underlying events.

Question 25Civil Litigation and Procedure

A court enters a default judgment against a defendant who was properly served but did not appear. The defendant later moves to set aside the default, asserting excusable neglect. What standard generally governs?

  1. The court may set aside the default for good cause shown, such as excusable neglect, and must consider prejudice to the plaintiff Correct answer.
  2. The defendant must prove the plaintiff's claim is meritless
  3. The default is final and cannot be challenged
  4. The default is automatically vacated upon any request

Explanation

Courts may relieve a party from a default judgment for good cause, including excusable neglect, mistake, or surprise, while weighing factors such as prejudice to the opposing party and whether a meritorious defense exists. Relief is discretionary, not automatic.

Question 26Civil Litigation and Procedure

A plaintiff files a complaint in the superior court. Under the typical rules of civil procedure, what must the complaint contain to survive a motion challenging its sufficiency?

  1. A memorandum of law citing every statute and case the plaintiff intends to rely upon
  2. A short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction, a short and plain statement of the claim showing entitlement to relief, and a demand for the relief sought Correct answer.
  3. A complete recitation of every item of evidence the plaintiff intends to introduce at trial
  4. A verified affidavit from each witness who will testify in support of the claim

Explanation

Notice pleading requires only a short and plain statement of jurisdiction, a short and plain statement of the claim, and a demand for relief. Detailed evidence, witness affidavits, and full legal argument are developed later through discovery and pretrial motions rather than in the pleading itself.

Question 27Civil Litigation and Procedure

A defendant is served with a summons and complaint in a civil action. Which response is the defendant required to file within the time allowed by the rules?

  1. An answer or a motion under the rules directed at the pleading Correct answer.
  2. A petition for a writ of certiorari
  3. A motion for a new trial
  4. A notice of appeal

Explanation

After service, the defendant must respond by answer or by a preliminary motion such as a motion to dismiss, within the prescribed period. A new trial motion, appeal, or certiorari petition all presuppose a judgment or final order that has not yet been entered.

Question 28Civil Litigation and Procedure

A plaintiff wishes to add a new defendant to a pending action after the case has been filed. Which procedural step is used to bring that party into the lawsuit?

  1. A motion for judgment on the pleadings
  2. An amended complaint, followed by service on the new party Correct answer.
  3. A subpoena duces tecum
  4. A motion for a protective order

Explanation

Adding a party requires amending the pleading to name the new party and then serving process on that party so jurisdiction is obtained. A protective order, judgment on the pleadings, and subpoena duces tecum do not add parties to an action.

Question 29Civil Litigation and Procedure

A plaintiff obtains a judgment and wishes to enforce it, but the judgment debtor refuses to pay voluntarily. Which procedural device allows the plaintiff to examine the debtor's assets?

  1. A motion for a bill of particulars
  2. A motion to quash service of process
  3. A post-judgment deposition or discovery in aid of execution Correct answer.
  4. A motion to compel arbitration

Explanation

After judgment, the creditor may use discovery in aid of execution, such as a debtor's examination or post-judgment deposition, to locate assets. Arbitration motions, bills of particulars, and motions to quash service operate during the litigation phase, before or apart from execution.

Question 30Civil Litigation and Procedure

A defendant receives a complaint but believes the court lacks personal jurisdiction over her because she has no contacts with the forum state. What is the proper procedural vehicle to raise this objection?

  1. A motion for a more definite statement
  2. A motion for summary judgment on the merits
  3. A motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, raised before answering to avoid waiver Correct answer.
  4. A motion for sanctions under the discovery rules

Explanation

A challenge to personal jurisdiction must be raised at the outset, typically by a motion to dismiss before or with the answer, or it is waived. Summary judgment, a more definite statement, and discovery sanctions all address different issues and do not preserve a jurisdictional objection.

Question 31Civil Litigation and Procedure

A plaintiff sues in federal court on a state-law claim. The defendant argues the federal court should decline to exercise jurisdiction over the state claim. Under the supplemental jurisdiction doctrine, when may a federal court decline to hear a state claim?

  1. Never, because supplemental jurisdiction is mandatory once the federal claim is filed
  2. Only when the state claim is worth less than the federal claim
  3. Only when both parties are citizens of the same state
  4. Whenever the state claim involves a novel or complex issue of state law, or the state claim substantially predominates over the federal claim Correct answer.

Explanation

A federal court may decline supplemental jurisdiction where the state claim raises novel or complex state-law issues, substantially predominates, or the federal claim has been dismissed. Value of the claim and diversity of citizenship are not the governing criteria, and the doctrine is discretionary rather than mandatory.

Question 32Civil Litigation and Procedure

During litigation, a party serves a request for admission on the opposing party. What is the effect if the opposing party fails to respond within the time allowed?

  1. The request is deemed admitted, and the matter is conclusively established unless the court permits withdrawal or amendment Correct answer.
  2. The court must impose a monetary sanction on the nonresponding party
  3. The request is automatically void and must be re-served
  4. The requesting party must file a motion to compel a response before any admission occurs

Explanation

Under the rules, a matter is admitted when a party fails to timely respond to a request for admission, and it is conclusively established unless the court allows withdrawal or amendment. A motion to compel is not a precondition, the request is not void, and sanctions are discretionary rather than automatic.

Question 33Civil Litigation and Procedure

A defendant intends to rely on the statute of limitations as a defense. Where must this defense be raised to avoid waiver?

  1. In the answer as an affirmative defense Correct answer.
  2. In a demand for a jury trial
  3. In a motion to quash service of process
  4. For the first time in a post-trial motion

Explanation

The statute of limitations is an affirmative defense that must be pleaded in the answer or raised by a preliminary motion, or it is generally waived. Post-trial motions, motions to quash, and jury demands are not vehicles for asserting this defense.

Question 34Civil Litigation and Procedure

A plaintiff serves a notice of deposition on a corporate defendant and requests that the corporation designate the appropriate witnesses to testify on specified topics. What is the corporation's obligation?

  1. It may respond by serving interrogatories in place of appearing for the deposition
  2. It may produce a single witness regardless of whether that witness has knowledge of the designated topics
  3. It must produce witnesses who are knowledgeable about the designated matters and may supplement its designation as new information arises Correct answer.
  4. It may refuse to produce any witness until the plaintiff identifies each employee by name

Explanation

A corporate deponent must designate one or more officers, directors, or managing agents to testify about the matters described, and it has a duty to prepare them and to supplement designations as needed. It cannot shift the burden to the plaintiff to name employees, produce an uninformed witness, or substitute interrogatories for appearance.

Question 35Civil Litigation and Procedure

A plaintiff seeks to introduce a business record at trial. The custodian testifies that the record was made at or near the time of the event by someone with knowledge, kept in the course of a regularly conducted activity, and made as a regular practice. What foundation satisfies the business records exception to the hearsay rule?

  1. The record must be signed by a notary public
  2. The record must be an original with no photocopies permitted
  3. The record must be authenticated and the foundational elements of the business records exception must be established Correct answer.
  4. The record must be certified by the opposing party

Explanation

The business records exception requires authentication plus proof that the record was made contemporaneously, by a knowledgeable person, in the regular course of business, and as a regular practice. Notarization, opposing-party certification, and an absolute original-document rule are not requirements of the exception.

Question 36Civil Litigation and Procedure

A party believes a prospective juror has a personal relationship with a key witness that would prevent impartial service. What procedure allows the party to remove that juror without stating a challenge for cause?

  1. A motion for a mistrial
  2. A peremptory challenge Correct answer.
  3. A motion for a directed verdict
  4. A motion in limine

Explanation

A peremptory challenge removes a juror without the need to show cause, subject to constitutional limits against discriminatory use. Directed verdict, motions in limine, and mistrial motions concern evidence or the conduct of trial, not jury selection.

Question 37Civil Litigation and Procedure

A defendant fails to appear and a default judgment is entered. The defendant later moves to set aside the default, asserting that the failure to appear was due to excusable neglect. Which standard generally governs relief from the default judgment?

  1. The court may set aside the default for good cause, including excusable neglect, and relief is committed to the court's discretion Correct answer.
  2. The default must be set aside automatically upon any request by the defendant
  3. Relief is unavailable once a default judgment has been entered
  4. Relief is available only if the plaintiff consents

Explanation

Relief from a default judgment is discretionary and may be granted for good cause, such as excusable neglect, mistake, or surprise, upon a showing that the defendant has a meritorious defense. It is not automatic, not contingent on plaintiff consent, and not foreclosed after entry of judgment.

Question 38Civil Litigation and Procedure

A plaintiff files a motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent the defendant from disposing of assets pending trial. What must the plaintiff typically demonstrate to obtain this relief?

  1. A final judgment on the merits
  2. A likelihood of success on the merits and a likelihood of irreparable harm absent the injunction, with the balance of equities and public interest favoring relief Correct answer.
  3. Only that the plaintiff has filed a complaint
  4. Only that the defendant has substantial assets

Explanation

Preliminary injunctive relief generally requires a showing of likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm, and that the balance of equities and public interest favor the injunction. Filing a complaint, the defendant's wealth, or a final judgment are not substitutes for these elements.

Question 39Civil Litigation and Procedure

A defendant removes a case to federal court. The plaintiff argues that removal was improper because the defendant is a citizen of the forum state and the action is a diversity case. Under the forum-defendant rule, what is the result?

  1. Removal is improper because a defendant who is a citizen of the forum state may not remove a diversity action Correct answer.
  2. Removal is proper because any defendant may remove regardless of citizenship
  3. Removal is improper because diversity cases can never be removed
  4. Removal is proper only if the plaintiff consents

Explanation

The forum-defendant rule bars removal of a diversity action by a defendant who is a citizen of the state in which the action was brought. Removal is not available merely because a defendant wishes it, plaintiff consent is not the test, and diversity actions are generally removable by out-of-state defendants.

Question 40Civil Litigation and Procedure

A party seeks to appeal an interlocutory order that is not a final judgment. What is generally required for an appellate court to review such an order before final judgment?

  1. Any interlocutory order may be appealed as of right
  2. The trial court must have already entered final judgment on all claims
  3. The appealing party must first file a motion for a new trial
  4. The order must fall within a category made appealable by statute or rule, or the court must grant permission for interlocutory review Correct answer.

Explanation

Appellate review before final judgment is exceptional and generally requires a statutory or rule-based authorization, such as certification or permission for interlocutory appeal. Interlocutory orders are not appealable as of right, final judgment has by definition not been entered, and a new trial motion is not a precondition.

Question 41Legal Research and Writing

Under the North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer who has been admitted in another state but is not admitted in North Carolina may handle a North Carolina matter only in limited circumstances. Which circumstance permits such practice?

  1. The matter is transactional and no North Carolina court filing is anticipated
  2. The lawyer is admitted pro hac vice by the North Carolina court before which the matter is pending Correct answer.
  3. The lawyer's home-state license is in good standing and the client consents in writing
  4. The lawyer associates with local counsel who reviews the final work product

Explanation

Rule 5.5 of the North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct permits a lawyer not admitted in North Carolina to appear before a tribunal only when authorized by law or order, most commonly through pro hac vice admission. Good standing elsewhere, client consent, or association with local counsel does not by itself authorize the practice of law in North Carolina.

Question 42Legal Research and Writing

A North Carolina lawyer is drafting a memorandum of law for superior court and wants to cite a controlling decision of the North Carolina Supreme Court. Which citation form does the North Carolina style manual generally require for that state case?

  1. Smith v. Jones, 31 S.E. 789 (N.C. 1900)
  2. Smith v. Jones, 123 N.C. 456, 31 S.E. 789 (1900) Correct answer.
  3. Smith v. Jones, 123 N.C. 456 (1900)
  4. Smith v. Jones, 123 N.C. 456; 31 S.E. 789 (1900)

Explanation

North Carolina practice generally calls for the official North Carolina Reports citation followed by the regional reporter citation in the same parenthetical, as in 123 N.C. 456, 31 S.E. 789 (1900). The parallel citation gives the reader both the official and regional reporter locations.

Question 43Legal Research and Writing

In North Carolina, the official published reports of decisions of the Court of Appeals are cited using which abbreviation?

  1. N.C. App. Rep.
  2. N.C.A.
  3. N.C. App. Correct answer.
  4. N.C. Ct. App.

Explanation

Decisions of the North Carolina Court of Appeals are officially reported in volumes abbreviated N.C. App. A citation such as 100 N.C. App. 1 identifies the official report of that court.

Question 44Legal Research and Writing

A North Carolina paralegal is asked to locate the current version of a statute that has been amended several times. Which research step best ensures the text relied on reflects all amendments?

  1. Relying on a law review article that quotes the statute
  2. Reading the statute as it appears in the bound volume of the General Statutes
  3. Using the session law that originally enacted the statute
  4. Checking the statute in the most recent cumulative supplement or official online General Statutes Correct answer.

Explanation

Bound volumes of the General Statutes are only current as of their publication date; amendments appear in cumulative supplements or the official online General Statutes. Verifying the statute in the most current source ensures later amendments are captured.

Question 45Legal Research and Writing

A lawyer needs the full text of a North Carolina session law enacted in 2019 that has not yet been codified. Which source most directly provides the enacted text?

  1. The Session Laws of North Carolina Correct answer.
  2. The North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure
  3. The North Carolina Reports
  4. The North Carolina Administrative Code

Explanation

Session laws publish acts of the General Assembly in the form enacted, before or apart from codification. They are the direct source for uncodified or recently enacted legislation.

Question 46Legal Research and Writing

A North Carolina lawyer is preparing an appellate brief and must determine whether a trial court's evidentiary ruling is reviewed de novo or for abuse of discretion. Which research approach most directly answers that question?

  1. Checking the trial court's local rules
  2. Reading the text of the evidentiary rule itself
  3. Locating appellate decisions stating the standard of review for that ruling Correct answer.
  4. Reviewing the official comments to the Rules of Evidence

Explanation

Standards of review are announced in appellate case law, so researching decisions addressing the specific ruling is the most direct route. The rule text and comments define the substantive rule but generally do not state the appellate standard.

Question 47Legal Research and Writing

A North Carolina practitioner wants to confirm that a case remains good law before citing it in a brief. Which tool is designed for that purpose?

  1. A citator such as Shepard's or KeyCite Correct answer.
  2. A form book
  3. A digest that organizes cases by topic
  4. An annotated statute

Explanation

Citators track subsequent history and treatment, showing whether a case has been overruled, distinguished, or otherwise affected. Checking a citator is the standard step to confirm a case is still good law.

Question 48Legal Research and Writing

A paralegal is asked to find North Carolina cases interpreting a specific statutory phrase. Which research technique is most efficient?

  1. Reviewing the session law that enacted the provision
  2. Searching the Administrative Code for the phrase
  3. Using the annotated statutes to find cases construing the provision Correct answer.
  4. Reading the statute's legislative history in full

Explanation

Annotated statutes compile citations to decisions that have construed each provision, making them the most efficient starting point for case law on a statutory phrase. Researchers can then pull and update the cited cases.

Question 49Legal Research and Writing

In North Carolina state court practice, the rules governing the form and filing of pleadings and motions are found primarily in which source?

  1. The North Carolina Rules of Evidence
  2. The North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure Correct answer.
  3. The North Carolina Administrative Code
  4. The North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct

Explanation

The North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure govern pleading, motion practice, and related procedure in state civil actions. The other sources address attorney conduct, agency rules, and evidentiary matters respectively.

Question 50Legal Research and Writing

A lawyer is writing a persuasive brief and wants to rely on a North Carolina Court of Appeals decision from 1995 that conflicts with a 2010 North Carolina Supreme Court decision on the same issue. How should the lawyer treat the Court of Appeals decision?

  1. Omit the Court of Appeals case because intermediate decisions are never citable
  2. Cite both without comment and let the court choose
  3. Treat the Supreme Court decision as controlling and address the conflict Correct answer.
  4. Cite it as controlling because it is more recent than the Supreme Court case

Explanation

The North Carolina Supreme Court is the state's court of last resort, so its decisions control over conflicting Court of Appeals decisions. A careful brief acknowledges the conflict and explains why the Supreme Court authority governs.