Disclosure Delivered Late: Two Overlapping Exit Rights
Seller Annette lists her 1996-built single-family home on March 1 at $298,000. Buyer Theo's offer of $290,000 is accepted March 4. The contract shows a due diligence period ending March 14 at 5:00 p.m., a $1,000 due diligence fee, and $4,000 earnest money held by the listing firm. Annette's agent delivers the Residential Property and Owners' Association Disclosure Statement to Theo on March 10, and Theo signs the receipt that day. The form discloses a repaired roof leak and answers 'No Representation' for mineral, oil, and gas rights. On March 12 Theo learns a neighboring parcel is slated for a warehouse and tells his agent he wants out. He has delivered no notice of any kind.
1. Compute the last day for Theo to exercise a disclosure-statement cancellation right, and compare it with his due diligence deadline. Which route should he use?
Read the worked answer
Counting the disclosure window. The three-day period runs from receipt and counts calendar days, not business days. Receipt March 10 → March 11, 12, and 13 are the three days, so written notice must be delivered by the end of March 13 (and in any event before transfer). March 12, when Theo decided, is inside the window.
Comparing the two vehicles.
- Disclosure cancellation is narrow: it exists because the seller furnished the statement after the offer and is a right to rescind, not a complaint about the property. It does not naturally reach an off-site condition such as a planned warehouse, and 'No Representation' on mineral rights is a permitted answer, not a defect.
- Due diligence termination runs to 5:00 p.m. March 14 and requires no reason at all. Theo can terminate for the warehouse concern or for nothing.
Recommendation: because the due diligence window is still open and is broader, use it - but do not let March 13 pass unused if the disclosure route is being preserved, since both are available now and neither is available later. Notice must be in writing and delivered exactly as the contract's notice clause requires; an email or text that the contract does not authorize is not delivery. Tell the broker-in-charge and the listing agent the same day, and do not let the client assume a phone call preserves anything.
2. Theo terminates. Annette claims she keeps both the earnest money and the due diligence fee. Analyze what each pot is and who is entitled to it, and state what the broker holding the $4,000 may do.
Read the worked answer
They are different animals. The $1,000 due diligence fee was paid to the seller as consideration for the buyer's right to terminate during the due diligence period; the buyer has now exercised that right, so the fee has done its job and normally stays with the seller. The $4,000 earnest money is a deposit toward the purchase; if Theo terminates properly within the due diligence period, the contract entitles him to its return.
If the disclosure route had been used instead, the statute's remedy is rescission with refund of the buyer's deposit - that is the statute speaking, not the contract. The due diligence fee is not the deposit, and whether it comes back is a contract question, not something the agent should concede or promise on the phone.
The broker's duty. The listing firm holds the $4,000 in trust. It may not hand it to Annette because she asks, and it may not hand it to Theo because he demands. Release requires a written agreement signed by both parties or a court order; until then the funds stay in the trust account and the broker-in-charge should notify both parties in writing of the competing claims. 'Seller keeps everything' and 'buyer gets everything' are both positions the broker records - not positions the broker adopts.
3. Theo now says the warehouse plan is a 'material fact' the listing agent had to disclose. Evaluate that claim and the agent's exposure.
Read the worked answer
Start with what the agent actually knew. The disclosure duty runs to material facts the agent knows or should reasonably know, and the Residential Property and Owners' Association Disclosure Statement is the seller's statement about the seller's own property, not a neighborhood or zoning report. Whether the warehouse is a material fact depends heavily on whether the agent had actual knowledge and whether the information was reasonably available and reliable - a rumor at a planning meeting is different from an approved site plan in the agent's own file.
Two separate standards. A seller's agent owes the buyer honesty and fairness and must disclose known material facts about the property; that duty does not convert the firm into the buyer's advocate or make it the buyer's researcher on off-site conditions. Theo is also in a due diligence period precisely so he can investigate zoning, adjacent parcels, and future land use on his own.
Exposure assessment. If the agent knew of the warehouse plan and stayed silent while saying nothing false, the claim is strongest where the defect would not be discoverable by the buyer's ordinary diligence. If the agent did not know, the disclosure statement was delivered late (a timing problem, addressed through the cancellation right), not a misrepresentation. Preserve the file, the disclosure receipt, and all communication about the disclosure delivery date; the timing failure is easier to defend than a knowing silence. Route the client to a real estate attorney for the cancellation and earnest money question.