The Subpoena in the Custody Dispute
A licensed professional counselor in solo private practice receives a subpoena duces tecum from the attorney representing a client's father in a custody dispute over a 9-year-old. The subpoena demands the complete record - intake, progress notes, treatment plan, and billing - within ten business days. The mother, who signed the intake consent, left a voicemail saying that nothing may be released and that the father "will twist everything." The father shares joint legal custody. Reviewing the file, the counselor finds two entries she had forgotten: a note that the mother described a shoving match with the father six months ago (the child was asleep upstairs and no report was made), and a note that the father attended two collateral sessions and disclosed his own history of alcohol treatment. The counselor has no forensic training, is licensed in the state where the case is being heard, and has never testified.
1. Does the subpoena by itself authorize the counselor to release the record? Outline what she must do before the ten-day deadline.
Read the worked answer
No. A subpoena duces tecum is a discovery demand issued by an attorney, not a court order signed by a judge, and it does not by itself override client privilege. The privilege belongs to the client, and for a 9-year-old it is generally exercised by a parent or guardian - here by two parents who disagree, which is itself a legal question the counselor cannot resolve on her own.
Sequence of steps:
- Release nothing and alter nothing. Do not delete, rewrite, or "clean up" any note; spoliation and alteration are separate, serious problems.
- Verify the subpoena: issuing court, jurisdiction, deadlines, and whether a protective order or authorization is attached.
- Notify both parents in writing, document the notification, and state that she intends to assert privilege until directed otherwise.
- Consult an attorney familiar with the state's privilege statute and minor-consent law, and check the ACA Code of Ethics and her malpractice carrier's risk-management line.
- Assert privilege on the client's behalf, and either seek the parents' written authorization, move to quash, or ask the court for a protective order or in camera review.
- If ordered to produce, negotiate the narrowest disclosure - often a treatment summary rather than verbatim process notes - and log exactly what was sent to whom.
A common error on this item is treating a subpoena as self-executing authority.
2. How should the counselor handle the two forgotten entries, and does the shoving-match note create a child-abuse reporting obligation?
Read the worked answer
Reporting obligations attach to suspected abuse or neglect of a child, and statutes vary by state about exposure to domestic violence. Here the child was asleep upstairs, was not present, and was not described as harmed. That fact pattern ordinarily does not meet a child-abuse reporting threshold, but the counselor should not decide this alone: she should read her state's statute and consult, then document the reasoning behind whatever she decides. If any later information suggests the child witnessed or was endangered by the violence, the duty is re-triggered.
As for the record itself: she cannot remove the entry. The correct move is an addendum, dated today and clearly labeled, that supplies context the original note lacks and states what was and was not reported. That preserves the integrity of the record while making it accurate.
Regarding the father's alcohol treatment disclosure: confidentiality protections specific to substance use treatment records (42 CFR Part 2) generally attach to federally assisted substance use programs, and a private counselor's collateral note usually falls outside them - but state law may still extend extra protection to substance use information. The safe course is to flag both entries to her attorney before any production rather than making that call herself.
3. The father's attorney calls and asks, "In your opinion, is the mother fit to have primary custody?" What is the appropriate response?
Read the worked answer
Decline the question while remaining professional and cooperative. The counselor is a treating clinician, not a forensic evaluator, and answering would create a dual role: she would be rendering an opinion about a person she has never assessed for parenting capacity, using data gathered for treatment rather than for the legal question. That is outside the standard of care and likely to be excluded or attacked, and it can damage the therapeutic relationship with the child.
A defensible response sounds like: "I'm the child's treating counselor. I can provide factual information about treatment if I'm authorized or ordered to, but custody recommendations are outside my role. I'd encourage the court to appoint a forensic evaluator."
If she is eventually ordered to testify, she should confine herself to facts - dates of service, presenting concerns, treatment goals, observed behavior - and avoid ultimate-issue opinions about custody or parental fitness. She should prepare with counsel, review the record beforehand, and not accept the attorney's framing of a question she cannot answer within her role. She should also document the call, the request, and her response. If the court does want a treating-clinician summary, that is a different and narrower product than a custody evaluation, and should be labeled as such.