Option Exercise, Expiring Funds, and a Missed Notice
An agency has a firm-fixed-price contract for IT service desk support with a base year and four 12-month options. The base year ends on December 31; today is November 15. The contractor's CPARS record contains marginal ratings for schedule and management, and the CO has documented two corrective action plans. The follow-on recompete has not been funded or approved; acquisition lead time is estimated at eight months. Option Year 1 pricing is 6% above the base year and within the ceiling of the contract's economic price adjustment clause. Option Year 1 would run from January 1 through December 31, crossing the agency's fiscal year boundary on September 30. The budget office says it cannot commit next fiscal year's funds, and the CO is considering not exercising the option. The contract includes FAR 52.217-9, which requires 60 days' preliminary notice; no notice has been given. The contract does not include FAR 52.217-8.
1. Can the CO exercise Option Year 1 using current fiscal year funds? Analyze the funding rule and FAR 17.207.
Read the worked answer
Likely yes, if current-year funds are available. The option period is 12 months and begins January 1, which is within the current fiscal year (October 1-September 30), but ends December 31, in the next fiscal year. For severable services, 41 U.S.C. 3902 (or 10 U.S.C. 2410a for DoD) permits an agency to obligate appropriations available at the time the contract is made for a period not exceeding 12 months, even though performance crosses the fiscal year boundary. The CO must still satisfy FAR 17.207(c): funds must be available for the option period, the requirement must continue, exercise must be the most advantageous method considering price and other factors, the option must have been synopsized, and failure to exercise must not cause unacceptable delay or cost.
The marginal CPARS ratings do not automatically bar exercise, but the CO must weigh them and document why continuity outweighs the risk, including the status of the corrective action plans. The CO should not exercise merely to avoid competition; the option was part of the evaluated contract.
2. What should the CO do about the missed 60-day notice under FAR 52.217-9?
Read the worked answer
The CO should issue the preliminary notice immediately, even though it is late, and document the reason. FAR 52.217-9 requires the notice at least 60 days before expiration; November 15 is less than 60 days before December 31. The notice does not itself exercise the option, but the contractor may rely on it.
The CO should contact the contractor in writing, explain the delay, and ask the contractor to confirm in writing that it will not treat the late notice as a bar to extension. If the contractor agrees, the CO can proceed to exercise the option before December 31. If the contractor refuses or raises prejudice, the CO should consult counsel and consider a short-term bridge. The CO should also document that the delay was an administrative error and that the Government still needs the services. Late notice is a risk to manage, not an automatic disqualification.
3. If the CO decides not to exercise the option, what alternatives should be considered and what approvals are needed?
Read the worked answer
The CO should consider a short-term bridge contract for the period needed to complete the recompete. A bridge is a new acquisition, so the CO needs a justification for other than full and open competition. FAR 6.302-1 (only one responsible source) is the stronger basis if the incumbent is the only source capable of continuing the help desk without unacceptable disruption; FAR 6.302-2 (unusual and compelling urgency) is weaker because the delay appears to result from lack of advance planning.
The J&A must be approved at the level required by FAR 6.304; for a bridge above $700,000, that is above the contracting officer. The CO should also consider whether a competitive short-term award is feasible, whether another vehicle can provide continuity, and whether the agency can accelerate the recompete. The CO should document the market research and the risk of a lapse in service. The decision should be made early enough to avoid an unauthorized commitment.