NVIDIA NCP-AAI study plan
NVIDIA NCP-AAI · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Agentic AI solution design and multi-agent interaction
Map the anatomy of an agentic loop (perceive, plan, act, observe, reflect) and label where tool calls, memory reads, and termination checks occur
Compare single-agent and multi-agent topologies (supervisor, hierarchical, peer-to-peer handoff, blackboard) on coordination cost, failure isolation, and debuggability
Write explicit role, responsibility, and handoff contracts for a three-agent pipeline so each agent's input and output schema is unambiguous
Identify the top five failure modes of agent handoffs (context loss, circular delegation, role drift, unbounded retries, ambiguous termination) and propose one mitigation per mode
Your checkpoint
A one-page architecture brief for a three-agent research-and-report system with a topology diagram, per-agent I/O schemas, and a failure-mode/mitigation table
Agentic AI solution design and multi-agent interaction
Design tool and function interfaces with typed parameters, idempotency keys, and structured error returns so agents can recover from failed calls
Specify memory layers (working context, episodic store, long-term retrieval) and decide what each agent may read and write
Define orchestration control flow including retry budgets, timeouts, escalation paths, and human-in-the-loop checkpoints
Draft evaluation criteria for multi-agent traces: task success, handoff accuracy, redundant-step rate, and cost per resolved task
Your checkpoint
A written design spec for the same system covering tool schemas, memory access rules, control-flow pseudocode, and a trace-evaluation rubric with at least six metrics
Scalability of agentic AI solutions
Characterize how latency, token cost, and context-window pressure scale as agent count and step depth grow, and identify the dominant bottleneck in each regime
Select parallelism and concurrency patterns (fan-out/fan-in, worker pools, async queues) that fit the workload's dependency graph
Design state management for long-running agent sessions, including checkpointing, resumability, and idempotent replay after failure
Plan horizontal scaling of tool and model endpoints with rate-limit handling, backoff, and request coalescing
Your checkpoint
A capacity model spreadsheet estimating tokens, latency, and cost per 1,000 tasks at three concurrency levels, plus a written scaling recommendation naming the binding constraint
Scalability of agentic AI solutions & Building and deploying advanced agentic AI solutions
Containerize an agent service and expose a health endpoint, structured logs, and trace identifiers that propagate across agent hops
Instrument the pipeline with distributed tracing and per-step metrics so a single task can be reconstructed end to end
Configure autoscaling rules and load-test the service to find the concurrency level where p95 latency degrades
Write a runbook for common production incidents: stuck loops, tool-endpoint outages, and runaway token spend
Your checkpoint
A running containerized reference deployment with tracing enabled, a load-test report showing throughput and p95 latency at three concurrency levels, and an incident runbook
Ethical safeguards and governance of agentic AI
Enumerate the ethical risk surface of agentic systems (harmful tool use, data leakage across agents, bias in routing, opacity of decisions) and rank each by likelihood and impact
Define guardrail layers: input validation, tool-permission scoping, output filtering, and escalation to a human reviewer
Specify an audit-log schema that captures decision rationale, tool invocations, and approver identity for every consequential action
Draft a governance policy covering agent ownership, change approval, and periodic review cadence
Your checkpoint
A governance and safeguards document containing a ranked risk register, a layered guardrail design, an audit-log schema, and a one-page policy summary
Ethical safeguards and governance of agentic AI & Building and deploying advanced agentic AI solutions
Build adversarial test cases that probe prompt injection, tool-argument tampering, privilege escalation, and cross-agent data leakage
Implement least-privilege tool scoping and verify it blocks a deliberately over-broad request
Define human-in-the-loop gates for irreversible or high-impact actions and test that the gate cannot be bypassed
Establish a red-team review cadence with pass/fail criteria tied to the risk register
Your checkpoint
A red-team test suite of at least fifteen adversarial cases with recorded results, plus evidence that the least-privilege and human-approval gates held
Building and deploying advanced agentic AI solutions
Assemble an end-to-end evaluation harness that scores task success, tool-call correctness, handoff quality, latency, and cost on a fixed task set
Run regression comparisons between two prompt or model configurations and interpret whether differences exceed noise
Tune retrieval and context assembly to reduce redundant steps without lowering task success
Document deployment stages (dev, staging, canary, production) with promotion criteria and rollback triggers
Your checkpoint
An evaluation report comparing two configurations across the five metrics, with a recommendation and a documented promotion and rollback checklist
Agentic AI solution design and multi-agent interaction & Scalability of agentic AI solutions & Ethical safeguards and governance of agentic AI & Building and deploying advanced agentic AI solutions
Consolidate weak areas by re-scoring practice questions per domain and re-studying any domain below a self-set threshold
Rehearse explaining architecture trade-offs, scaling bottlenecks, and governance controls aloud in exam-style scenarios
Verify recall of key definitions: agent loop, handoff contract, idempotency, least privilege, audit trail, human-in-the-loop
Finalize a personal one-page reference sheet of decision rules for design, scaling, and ethics questions
Your checkpoint
A scored full-length practice set with per-domain breakdown, a remediation log for every missed item, and a final one-page decision-rule reference sheet
Milestones
Week 2: Can explain, without notes, the difference between supervisor and peer-to-peer topologies and justify a topology choice for a stated workload in under three minutes
Week 4: Reference deployment runs end to end, traces propagate across all agent hops, and load-test data identifies a concrete concurrency ceiling
Week 6: Every adversarial case in the red-team suite has a recorded outcome, and no high-impact action bypassed its human-approval gate
Week 8: Practice-set score meets the self-set passing threshold in all four domains, with no domain below sixty percent