The Witness Who Turns Away, and Counsel Who Wants the Letter on Camera Mid-Answer
Mid-morning in a wrongful-termination deposition. The witness is 78 and wears a behind-the-ear hearing aid in his right ear; he habitually turns his whole torso to his left to consult counsel, who sits about 30 inches away. The camera is framed head-and-shoulders on a tripod. Forty minutes in, plaintiff counsel holds a two-page termination letter roughly 18 inches from the witness's face and asks him to read a paragraph aloud. Defense counsel objects, then tells you to "get that letter on camera." The witness's voice drops noticeably while reading. Recording must be continuous and unedited, and no stipulation about camera moves has been placed on the record.
1. Two attorneys are now giving you incompatible directions about the camera. What do you do in the moment, and what do you do about it afterward?
Read the worked answer
You take direction from the record, not from whoever is louder.
In the moment: keep recording, do not change framing in response to either instruction, and say aloud - so the microphones capture it - something neutral such as "I'm not able to take camera direction from one party off the record; if counsel want a specific view of the exhibit, please state it on the record." That converts a private instruction into a stipulatable request.
Afterward: log the exchange with its timecode. If the parties agree on the record that exhibits will be held to the camera after marking, comply and note where framing changed. If they do not agree, stay wide enough to hold the witness, the letter, and the hands holding it.
Why it matters: a videographer who visibly favors one side's requested shots has handed the other side an argument that the recording is argumentative rather than evidentiary.
2. The witness repeatedly turns his torso to consult counsel. How do you handle framing and follow-focus without ruining the image?
Read the worked answer
Chasing him with the camera is the wrong instinct: constant panning produces motion artifacts, induces viewer fatigue, and makes the record look agitated.
Better approach:
- Frame for the range of motion, not the current pose. Set the shot wide enough that both his forward-facing and turned positions stay inside the frame with acceptable headroom. That may mean a slightly looser head-and-shoulders than looks best in a still.
- Set depth of field to cover the move. A moderate aperture keeps both his near and far positions sharp, so refocusing is unnecessary.
- Reframe only at natural breaks - a pause, an exhibit being marked, a change of examiner - and do it slowly. Never mid-answer.
- Focus manually and pre-focus on the far position; if the camera has face-tracking, disable it, because it will hunt on a turning head.
The governing question is whether a viewer can identify the speaker and read his demeanor. Moment-to-moment compositional polish is secondary to that.
3. The witness reads the letter in a much quieter voice than he answers questions. What is your obligation, and what can you actually do about it while recording?
Read the worked answer
Your obligation is that the spoken record be intelligible on playback - an inaudible reading is as damaging as a blank frame.
What you can do without stopping: ride gain manually and smoothly, listening on headphones so you hear what the recording hears, not what the room hears. If the drop is severe, raise the channel and watch the meter rather than your ears.
What you should not do is decide, alone, that the reading is "off the record." If you genuinely cannot capture it, address it on the record through counsel - ask that the witness be reminded to speak up, or that the letter be read at a normal level. That request belongs to a party, not to you; you can prompt them to make it.
Log the segment and its timecode, and flag the audio condition when you deliver. A notation of "witness reading, low level, enhanced in monitoring only" protects everyone; silently processing the audio and saying nothing does not.