ODS-C study materials
ODS-C study resources

ODS-C cheat sheet

ODS-C · Keep the key ideas within reach.

Quick reference

Cancer Registry Operations and Data Collection

  • Reportable case definition: a newly diagnosed malignancy (behavior code /3) in a resident of the registry catchment area, plus in-situ (/2) cases only where the standard setter requires them; benign and borderline tumors are reportable only for specified sites (e.g., brain/CNS, bladder).

  • Notifiable condition: case ascertainment relies on state legal mandate; reporting sources include hospitals, outpatient surgery centers, pathology labs, radiation oncology, and physician offices, with reporting deadlines set by state regulation (commonly 6 months from diagnosis).

  • Multiple primary rules: use the current solid tumor rules (site-specific, replacing the 2007 MP rules) for invasive and in-situ solid tumors; use the hematopoietic and lymphoid neoplasm rules for blood cancers, where histology and timing drive counting.

  • Date of diagnosis hierarchy: use the earliest date of histologic/cytologic confirmation; if none, the earliest date of clinical diagnosis (imaging, physical exam, or physician statement); never substitute the date of first treatment or accession date.

  • Abstracting sequence: identify the patient and facility, assign accession number, code patient demographics, then tumor-specific fields (site, histology, behavior, grade, laterality), then stage, then first-course treatment, then follow-up.

  • Primary site and histology are coded from ICD-O-3 (with current update tables); topography uses the 4-character site code and morphology uses 4-digit histology plus a one-digit behavior code, with grade in a separate field.

  • Class of case separates analytic (diagnosed and/or first course of treatment at the reporting facility) from non-analytic cases; only analytic cases enter survival and treatment analyses, so misclassification distorts facility comparisons.

  • Follow-up: active annual follow-up captures vital status, date of last contact, recurrence, and subsequent treatment; registries use death certificate clearance, NDI linkage, and hospital/clinic queries to reduce lost-to-follow-up.

Quick reference

Cancer Diagnosis, Staging, and Treatment

  • Staging systems are not interchangeable: AJCC TNM (anatomic extent, edition-specific), SEER Summary Stage (localized/regional/distant), and collaborative-stage/SSDI rules each answer different questions; never convert one to another by assumption.

  • AJCC T describes primary tumor size/invasion, N describes regional lymph node involvement, M describes distant metastasis; prefix c = clinical, p = pathologic, y = post-neoadjuvant, r = recurrent, a = autopsy.

  • Pathologic stage requires resection of the primary (or sufficient tissue) to assess the highest T and N; clinical stage may be assigned from imaging and exam when no resection occurs, and must be coded even when pathologic stage is unavailable.

  • Summary Stage 2018 categories: in situ, localized, regional (direct extension, regional nodes, or both), distant, and unknown; benign/borderline CNS tumors use a separate schema.

  • Grade reflects differentiation and is site-specific: Gleason score/grade group for prostate, Nottingham (Bloom-Richardson) for breast, Fuhrman/WHO/ISUP for kidney, and differentiation for most carcinomas.

  • First course of treatment includes all treatment intended to modify the tumor, delivered within the first course window (generally the first 12 months or until progression/recurrence, whichever comes first); it includes surgery, radiation, systemic therapy, and immunotherapy.

  • Surgery codes distinguish diagnostic-only procedures from definitive resection; a biopsy that removes the entire tumor still may be diagnostic if the intent was diagnosis, so abstract intent rather than specimen size alone.

  • Biomarker and molecular fields (e.g., ER/PR/HER2 for breast, KRAS/NRAS for colorectal, EGFR/ALK for lung) are required data items because they drive treatment and stratified reporting.

Quick reference

Cancer Registry Standards, Compliance, and Quality

  • Standard setters: the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries sets data standards and certification; state central registries set reporting regulations; facility cancer programs follow Commission on Cancer (CoC) standards for accreditation.

  • Data standards are versioned: each diagnosis year has a defined ICD-O-3 update, staging edition, and required data set; abstracting a case to the wrong diagnosis-year standard is a common audit finding.

  • Consent, confidentiality, and HIPAA: registry reporting is generally permitted as required-by-law public health activity, but release of identified data for research requires IRB approval and data-use agreements.

  • Quality control has three pillars: completeness (casefinding audits against pathology and discharge lists), accuracy (reabstracting/recode audits), and timeliness (reporting within required intervals).

  • NAACCR certification uses measures such as completeness (estimated percentage of reportable cases captured), timeliness, and data quality edits; failure to meet thresholds affects central registry certification status.

  • Edits: interfield and intrafield consistency checks (e.g., a male with cervical primary, or a localized stage with distant metastasis code) must be resolved before submission; unresolved errors block record acceptance.

  • Casefinding audit method: re-review a sample of pathology logs, radiation logs, and disease index listings against registry accession files; missed cases are counted and the miss rate is used to correct estimates.

  • Confidentiality breach response includes documentation, notification per state law and HIPAA, and root-cause review; registry staff access is role-based and audited.

Quick reference

Cancer Data Analysis, Research, and Public Health Reporting

  • Incidence rate = (new cases in period / population at risk) × 100,000; use the population matching the case definition (e.g., sex-specific denominators for sex-specific cancers).

  • Age adjustment: direct standardization applies a standard population's age-specific weights to the study population's rates; use the 2000 U.S. standard population for comparability with national statistics.

  • Crude rate reflects actual burden; age-adjusted rate allows comparison across populations with different age structures; both should be reported when describing burden.

  • Relative survival = observed survival / expected survival of a matched general population; it estimates the excess mortality attributable to cancer without requiring cause of death.

  • Observed survival requires accurate vital status follow-up; cases lost to follow-up bias survival upward if they are healthier, so completeness of follow-up must be documented.

  • Prevalence counts people alive with a cancer history at a point in time; it depends on incidence, survival, and time since diagnosis, so it is not a substitute for incidence.

  • Stage distribution, histology distribution, and treatment pattern analyses are descriptive; inferential comparisons require attention to small numbers (suppression thresholds, often <16 cases) and confidence intervals.

  • Public health reporting products (e.g., state cancer profiles, national incidence reports) lag diagnosis by years because of reporting, consolidation, and follow-up requirements; interpret trends with that lag in mind.