ND Bar study materials
ND Bar study resources

ND Bar: MBE: Doctrine Under Time Pressure

ND Bar · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

MBE: Doctrine Under Time Pressure

What the MBE tests

The North Dakota Bar’s MBE component is the NCBE’s 200-question, six-hour multiple-choice test; 175 questions are scored and 25 are unscored. It samples seven subjects-Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Contracts, Criminal Law and Procedure, Evidence, Real Property, and Torts-through fact patterns that require selecting the single best answer under prevailing majority doctrine.

Core rules and concepts

  • Civil Procedure: personal jurisdiction (minimum contacts, fair play), subject-matter jurisdiction, venue, Erie, pleading, summary judgment, claim and issue preclusion.
  • Constitutional Law: state action, due process, equal protection tiers, First Amendment, Commerce Clause, federalism.
  • Contracts: common law versus UCC Article 2, formation, consideration, Statute of Frauds, parol evidence, remedies.
  • Criminal Law: actus reus, mens rea, homicide, defenses, Fourth/Fifth/Sixth Amendment.
  • Evidence: relevance, character, hearsay and exceptions, confrontation, impeachment.
  • Real Property: estates, future interests, landlord-tenant, easements, covenants, recording.
  • Torts: negligence elements, intentional torts, strict liability, products liability.

Worked example

A merchant signs a writing promising to sell 500 widgets at $10 each and to keep the offer open until May 1. On April 15 the merchant revokes; the buyer accepts on April 20. Under UCC § 2-205, a merchant’s signed assurance that an offer will be held open is irrevocable for the stated time-up to three months-even without consideration. The April 15 revocation is ineffective, so the April 20 acceptance forms a contract unless another defense applies. The answer is not “revocation is effective because no consideration”; that is the common-law trap.

Traps

Ignoring the call (“which is most likely”); applying common law to a sale of goods; treating “not hearsay” as an exception; confusing burdens of production and persuasion; and choosing a true statement that does not answer the question.