NEBOSH IDip flashcards
NEBOSH IDip · Build recall with a focused review session.
32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- Reasonably practicable test
- Weigh the risk against the sacrifice (time, trouble, cost) needed to control it. Cost only justifies inaction where it is grossly disproportionate to the risk reduction achieved.
- ALARP
- As Low As Reasonably Practicable. Risk must be reduced below the tolerable level unless the cost of further control is grossly disproportionate to the benefit gained.
- PDCA cycle
- Plan, Do, Check, Act. The improvement loop underlying ISO 45001: plan controls, implement them, monitor performance, then correct and improve the management system.
- Active monitoring
- Proactive measurement of control before loss occurs: inspections, audits, exposure monitoring and compliance checks. It tests whether controls are in place and working.
- Reactive monitoring
- Measurement of failure after the event: accidents, incidents, near misses, ill health, complaints and enforcement action. It shows where controls have failed.
- Bird's accident triangle
- For each serious injury there are roughly 10 minor injuries, 30 property-damage incidents and 600 near misses. Near misses are free lessons and should be investigated.
- Root cause
- The underlying management or design failure that allowed an immediate cause (unsafe act or condition) to exist, such as no maintenance system or no competence requirement.
- Safety culture maturity
- Progression from pathological and reactive, through calculative and proactive, to generative, where health and safety is embedded in how the organisation does business.
- Risk assessment formula
- Risk equals likelihood multiplied by severity of consequence. The rating drives prioritisation of controls; residual risk must be recorded after controls are applied.
- Fire tetrahedron
- Fuel, oxygen, heat and chemical chain reaction. Removing any one side extinguishes the fire; fire classes A, B, C, D and F reflect the fuel type.
- Flammable atmosphere limits
- A fire or explosion needs a concentration between the lower and upper explosive limits and an ignition source above the minimum ignition energy.
- Noise action values
- Lower action value 80 dB(A), upper action value 85 dB(A) daily exposure; peak action values 135 dB(C) and 137 dB(C). Hearing protection is PPE, used after noise reduction.
- HAVS exposure values
- Hand-arm vibration: action value 2.5 m/s² A(8), limit value 5 m/s² A(8). Control by low-vibration tools, trigger-time limits and health surveillance.
- TILE manual handling
- Task, Individual, Load, Environment. Each factor changes the risk independently of load weight, so assessment must consider all four.
- Confined space hazards
- Oxygen deficiency or enrichment, toxic gas, flammable atmosphere and engulfment. Entry needs a permit, atmospheric testing, a rescue plan and non-entry rescue where practicable.
- LEV at source
- Local exhaust ventilation captures airborne contaminants near the point of generation, before they enter the breathing zone; it ranks above general ventilation and RPE.
- Machine guarding rule
- Guards prevent access to dangerous parts and must fail safe; interlocks stop the machine before access is possible. Emergency stops complement, not replace, guarding.
- Hierarchy of control
- Eliminate, substitute, engineering controls, administrative controls, then PPE. PPE is the last line of defence and protects only the wearer.
- Practical report structure
- Executive summary, scope and methodology, findings with evidence, risk assessment table, prioritised action plan, conclusions and recommendations to top management.
- SMART action
- Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound. An action without an owner and a target date is not a control.
- Observation walk technique
- Walk the site by process flow rather than at random, recording what is seen, where, and which hazard category and standard it relates to.
- Risk prioritisation rule
- Rank findings by likelihood times severity using a stated matrix; address high risk first and apply interim controls where the permanent fix takes time.
- Cost-benefit justification
- Quantify the risk reduction, compare it with the cost of the control, and state whether cost is grossly disproportionate to justify the recommendation.
- Weakness analysis levels
- Individual factors (behaviour, competence), job factors (task design, procedures) and organisational factors (culture, resources, priorities); organisational factors usually carry the highest leverage.
- Evidence-based findings
- Each finding in the practical report must be supported by what was observed or measured, then linked to a hazard category and a legal or standards reference.
- Continuing professional development
- Record planned and unplanned learning, reflect on how practice changed, and evidence it against a competence framework. Output matters more than hours logged.
- Professional code of conduct
- Work within competence, act with honesty and integrity, keep confidentiality, avoid conflicts of interest, report serious risk, and never misrepresent qualifications.
- Whistleblowing escalation
- Raise the concern internally first; if the risk is serious and imminent and internal channels fail, escalate to the regulator. Record the timeline and protect evidence.
- Competence components
- Knowledge, skills, experience and behaviour. A qualification alone does not demonstrate competence for a specific task or workplace.
- Ethical dilemma test
- Ask whether it is legal, consistent with the code, who is harmed, whether you would defend it publicly, and what a reasonable professional would do. Document the reasoning.
- Reflective practice cycle
- Gibbs: description, feelings, evaluation, analysis, conclusion, action plan. The action plan is what converts experience into improved competence.
- Mentoring versus supervision
- A mentor gives guidance and challenge; supervision is a formal, recorded relationship. In both, accountability for decisions stays with the practitioner.