The Underwriter's Dilemma: A High-Risk Commercial Fleet
A logistics company with 42 heavy goods vehicles applies for a motor fleet policy. Its loss ratio over the last three years is 118%, driven by four large claims: two rear-end collisions attributed to driver fatigue, one theft of a loaded trailer from an unsecured yard, and one major engine fire. The fleet manager says the company has introduced a telematics system and a driver-hours policy in the last six months but has no data yet on its effectiveness. The company is also bidding for a large supermarket contract that would increase mileage by 30% within the policy period. The underwriter has authority to write the risk but must refer anything with a loss ratio above 100% or a projected premium below £250,000. The indicated technical premium is £310,000; the broker is offering £230,000.
1. Explain the underwriting decision the underwriter should make and the reasoning behind it.
Read the worked answer
The underwriter cannot simply accept at the offered premium - the risk breaches two referral triggers: loss ratio above 100% and projected premium below the referral threshold.
- Assess the risk quality. The four large claims point to management and hazard factors: fatigue (driver management), theft (yard security), and fire (maintenance). These are controllable risks, so the underwriter should focus on the risk improvement measures rather than decline outright.
- Evaluate the mitigants. Telematics and a driver-hours policy are positive, but with only six months' data there is no credible evidence of improvement. The underwriter should treat them as conditions (warranties or risk-improvement requirements) rather than rating credits.
- Account for the exposure change. The supermarket contract would increase mileage by 30%, raising frequency exposure. The underwriter must either rate for the projected exposure or impose a mileage/contract notification condition.
- Premium adequacy. The technical premium is £310,000; £230,000 is materially inadequate and would worsen the loss ratio. The underwriter should decline the offered terms, counter at or near technical premium with conditions, and refer upward because the referral triggers are met.
Decision: Refer to senior underwriting with a recommendation to quote at £310,000 (or a rated programme with a deductible and telematics conditions), not to bind at £230,000.
2. Draft the key conditions the underwriter should attach if the risk is written, and explain why each is appropriate.
Read the worked answer
Suggested conditions:
- Telematics warranty: all vehicles fitted and data shared monthly. Why: directly addresses fatigue and driving behaviour; gives the insurer evidence to re-rate at renewal.
- Driver-hours and fatigue management policy, audited annually. Why: targets the root cause of two large claims.
- Yard security condition (fencing, lighting, immobilisation, trailer locks). Why: addresses the theft exposure, which is a hazard the insured controls.
- Maintenance/inspection regime for fire risk (PAT testing, extinguishers, engine checks). Why: addresses the fire claim and supports a risk improvement programme.
- Mileage/contract notification clause: notify the insurer before the supermarket contract commences so exposure can be re-rated. Why: prevents non-disclosure of a material change and keeps premium aligned to exposure.
- Higher deductible (e.g. £5,000) to share the frequency risk and encourage loss control.
Each condition should be clear, specific and monitored; a condition precedent to liability must be drafted unambiguously to be enforceable.