Kudi Microfinance Bank: Retention, Supervision and an Informal Group
Kudi Microfinance Bank has 14 branches, 310 staff and 190,000 low-income customers. Teller turnover reached 41% last year and loan-officer turnover 28%; exit interviews cite 'no future', 'unfair targets' and 'the branch manager shouts'. An engagement survey scores supervision at 2.1 out of 5. Branch managers set daily deposit targets that change without notice, often mid-morning. Top performers receive a ₦20,000 monthly bonus, while any cash error is deducted from all tellers in the branch. In three branches, staff have formed an informal 'Thursday club' that shares tips on avoiding transfers and coaches new hires to under-report customer complaints. A union petition alleges victimisation of two staff who raised a fire-safety issue, and the branch involved has since had two resignations. The bank cannot afford branch closures. The head of HR proposes a 15% across-the-board salary increase. The CEO wants a retention plan within 60 days and has ₦40 million to spend.
1. Using motivation and group-dynamics theory, explain why the proposed 15% salary increase alone is unlikely to reduce turnover.
Read the worked answer
The 15% increase treats motivation as a pay problem. Herzberg: pay is a hygiene factor. It prevents dissatisfaction but does not create sustained motivation. The survey points to motivators - recognition, advancement, responsibility - and to supervision at 2.1/5.
Equity theory: deducting cash errors from all tellers in a branch punishes innocent staff for a colleague's mistake. That produces perceived inequity and either reduced effort or exit. A ₦20,000 bonus for top performers while collective deductions apply makes the comparison worse. Expectancy theory: daily targets changed without notice weaken the belief that effort leads to performance, and the performance-reward link is unclear. Goal-setting theory: targets that shift mid-morning are not goals, they are noise.
Group dynamics: the Thursday club exists because the formal system is seen as unfair and unsafe. It is cohesive and has norms (avoid transfers, under-report complaints) that are functional for members but dysfunctional for the bank. Punishing the group will increase cohesiveness against management. The union petition signals perceived procedural injustice, which a pay rise does not address.
A salary increase may briefly reduce exits, but it will not repair supervision, target credibility or collective punishment. Turnover will resume once the pay effect wears off.
2. Recommend a sequenced 60-day retention plan. Distinguish branch-level changes, bank-level changes, and how to handle the informal group and the union petition.
Read the worked answer
Days 1–15, stabilise. Suspend collective error deductions and replace them with individual coaching and a documented error-review process. Freeze target changes for one quarter and publish a target-setting calendar. Meet the union jointly with the CEO, confirm there will be no victimisation, and investigate the fire-safety complaint. These are bank-level actions that remove the most visible injustices.
Days 16–35, fix supervision. Train all 14 branch managers in goal-setting, feedback and fair process; introduce weekly one-to-ones and a short branch pulse survey. Publish a clear promotion ladder from teller to senior teller and loan officer, with criteria. This is branch-level and bank-level work, because supervision quality is local but standards are central.
Days 36–60, rebuild rewards and voice. Replace the single ₦20,000 bonus with a balanced branch scorecard covering deposits, portfolio quality, customer complaints and staff retention, plus modest recognition. Introduce a confidential grievance channel independent of the branch manager. Co-opt the Thursday club informally: invite two respected members onto a service-improvement working group, converting an anti-system norm into a problem-solving one rather than trying to break the group.
Spend the ₦40m on supervision training, targeted retention allowances for critical roles, and career development rather than across-the-board pay. Track monthly turnover, engagement, complaint-reporting rate and grievance resolution time. Communicate the 'why' before the 'what'.