ICSAN Board Dynamics study plan
ICSAN Board Dynamics · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Board Roles, Responsibilities and Legal Duties
Map each statutory and fiduciary duty of a director (care, skill, diligence, good faith, loyalty, disclosure of interest, avoidance of conflicts) to at least two concrete board behaviours you have observed or can find in public governance reports
Draft a one-page decision tree for handling a declared conflict of interest, from declaration through recusal to minute recording, and test it against three hypothetical scenarios
Distinguish the legal duties of a director from those of a non-executive chair and a company secretary, writing a short comparison table with the source of each obligation noted
Build a personal glossary of 25 key governance terms in English with one-line working definitions, flagging any term you cannot yet define without notes
Your checkpoint
A 1,200-word duty map plus conflict-of-interest decision tree, self-marked against the syllabus for Domain 1
Board Roles, Responsibilities and Legal Duties & Risk, Compliance and Ethical Governance
Explain how fiduciary duties interact with risk oversight, articulating the board's risk appetite role versus management's risk-owning role in under 400 words
Analyse two published enforcement or sanction decisions (any jurisdiction) and extract the specific director conduct that triggered liability
Outline an ethics and compliance escalation route from employee to board audit committee, identifying the three points where it most often breaks
Self-test on Domain 1 and Domain 8 using 40 recall questions you write yourself, then re-study every item you answered wrongly
Your checkpoint
A 900-word case analysis of two enforcement decisions with a one-page escalation-route diagram
Board Composition, Structure and Independence & Board Committees and Delegation of Authority
Design an ideal board composition for a mid-sized listed company, justifying each seat against strategy, sector knowledge, independence and diversity criteria
Differentiate independence, objectivity and absence of conflicts using three worked examples where a director is one but not the others
Draft committee terms of reference for audit, risk and remuneration committees, specifying membership, quorum, meeting frequency and reporting lines
Distinguish reserved-to-board matters from delegated authority by producing a two-column delegation schedule with at least 12 items
Your checkpoint
A board composition rationale plus a delegation-of-authority schedule covering three committees, totalling about 1,500 words
Board Meetings, Agenda and Information Management & Board Dynamics, Group Behaviour and Decision-Making
Construct a model board agenda for a quarterly meeting that allocates time to strategy, risk, performance and compliance in defensible proportions
Identify five behavioural traps in board decision-making (groupthink, anchoring, deference to the chair, sunken-cost escalation, premature consensus) and write a countermeasure for each
Design a board pack standard: what a paper must contain, maximum length, how recommendations are framed, and the deadline for circulation
Practice minuting a difficult discussion by writing minutes for a hypothetical conflicted debate, capturing decisions and dissent without attributing blame
Your checkpoint
A complete model board pack index with agenda timing plan and one set of practice minutes
Board Effectiveness, Evaluation and Development
Build a board evaluation framework covering individual director review, committee review and full-board review, with the criteria and rating scale for each
Write 15 behavioural questions a chair could ask in a peer review conversation, avoiding questions that invite a yes/no answer
Design a 90-minute director induction and a rolling continuing-professional-development plan mapped to identified skill gaps
Draft an action-tracking template that converts evaluation findings into owners, deadlines and follow-up reporting to the board
Your checkpoint
A board evaluation toolkit: framework, 15 peer-review questions, induction outline and action tracker, about 1,800 words
Stakeholder Engagement and Board- Management Relations
Map the legitimate interests and information needs of five stakeholder groups, and state the board's engagement mechanism and frequency for each
Articulate the board-management boundary: where oversight ends and executive decision-making begins, using three worked scenarios
Draft a one-page protocol for a chair and CEO relationship, covering one-to-one cadence, escalation and disagreement handling
Prepare talking points for a board responding to a hostile shareholder question at an annual general meeting, keeping to disclosure constraints
Your checkpoint
A stakeholder engagement matrix plus chair-CEO protocol, self-checked for internal consistency
Board Roles, Responsibilities and Legal Duties & Board Effectiveness, Evaluation and Development & Board Dynamics, Group Behaviour and Decision-Making
Revisit the weakest three topics from your week 2 and week 5 self-tests and close each gap with written notes and a worked example
Complete a full timed mock under exam conditions, then classify every error as knowledge, comprehension or application failure
Practise ten scenario questions aloud, structuring each answer as issue, principle, application, conclusion within 90 seconds
Summarise the entire syllabus onto six revision cards, one per page, with no more than 12 bullet points each
Your checkpoint
A timed mock score with an error-classification log and six condensed revision cards
Board Roles, Responsibilities and Legal Duties & Board Composition, Structure and Independence & Board Committees and Delegation of Authority & Board Meetings, Agenda and Information Management & Board Effectiveness, Evaluation and Development & Board Dynamics, Group Behaviour and Decision-Making & Stakeholder Engagement and Board- Management Relations & Risk, Compliance and Ethical Governance
Run a second timed mock and target a measurable improvement over the week 7 score
Drill your weakest 30 recall items daily until each is answered correctly three times without notes
Rehearse application-style answers on group dynamics and stakeholder conflict, the two areas most often answered generically
Finalise an exam-day plan covering time allocation per question, order of attempt and a strategy for questions you cannot fully answer
Your checkpoint
Final mock score, a one-page exam-day plan and a confidence rating per domain with any residual gaps flagged
Milestones
Week 2: You can explain fiduciary duties and risk oversight without notes and have scored at least 70% on your own 40-question Domain 1 and 8 self-test
Week 4: You can produce a defensible board composition, committee structure and delegation schedule for a new scenario in under 45 minutes
Week 6: You can answer stakeholder and board-management boundary questions in structured issue-principle-application-conclusion form without prompts
Week 8: Second mock score exceeds the first by at least 10 percentage points and no domain remains below 60%