The Paid Trip That Was Not a Private Flight
A pilot licensed three months ago holds a Nigerian PPL and flies a Cessna 172 registered 5N-BQT, owned by a small company. He has 62 hours total, 9 on type, and no instrument or night rating. A Lagos businessman offers ₦450,000 for a return flight to Abuja carrying him and two colleagues the next day, and asks that a sealed parcel also be delivered to a contact in Abuja. A friend advises him to issue a receipt described as 'cost sharing' and to split the money with the aircraft owner. The aircraft's insurance policy states 'private use only'. The flight would depart Lagos at 09:00 and return the same afternoon; the aircraft is based at the general aviation terminal. The pilot's own flying is funded by his salary, and he has never been paid to fly before.
1. May the pilot accept the trip under his PPL privileges?
Read the worked answer
No - this is commercial air transport, not a private flight. Under the Nig. CARs personnel licensing provisions (which mirror ICAO Annex 1), a PPL may act as pilot-in-command only in non-commercial operations. The holder may not fly for remuneration and may not accept hire or reward. Carrying three passengers for a negotiated ₦450,000 plus a parcel for a company has all the elements of commercial air transport: carriage of passengers and cargo for reward. That requires a CPL/ATPL and an operator holding an AOC.
The label on the receipt is irrelevant; regulators look at substance - payment, holding out to the public, and the purpose of the flight. Other red flags: 62 hours total time, 9 on type, an insurance policy limited to private use, and a fee paid to the owner. A ramp inspection or an accident would expose an uninsured, unlicensed commercial operation.
2. Could the pilot lawfully share costs with the passengers instead? Set out what a genuine cost share requires.
Read the worked answer
Genuine cost sharing is narrow. A lawful private cost share requires: all occupants share a common purpose for the trip; the pilot genuinely pays a pro-rata share of direct costs (fuel, oil, landing fees); no profit is made; no cargo is carried for reward; and the flight is not advertised or held out. The pilot must not be paid for his time or skill.
Here none of those conditions is met. The pilot is being paid, not paying; the amount is fixed in advance and negotiated with the passenger; a commercial parcel is on board; and the money is to be split with the owner, which is a direct reward for the use of the aircraft. Even splitting only the fuel cost would not save the flight once an external customer is paying for carriage and cargo. If the pilot wants to fly friends, he should charge nothing and pay his own share.
3. If the pilot proceeds and is either ramp-checked or has an accident, what are the consequences and who bears them?
Read the worked answer
Consequences fall in four layers. (1) Regulatory: NCAA enforcement action against the licence - suspension or revocation - and against the owner/operator for an unlicensed commercial operation. (2) Insurance: the policy is void for a use outside the declared 'private use only' scope, so hull and third-party liability cover may not respond. (3) Civil liability: injured passengers or third parties would pursue the pilot and owner personally. (4) Criminal/administrative exposure under the Civil Aviation Act and Nig. CARs for operating without the required licence and certificate.
The pilot's logbook and the receipt would be evidence of the reward. The right decision is to decline and, if the businessman wants a charter, refer him to an AOC holder.