More study resources

About this exam

The New Hampshire Physical Therapist Jurisprudence Examination is the state-specific law and rules assessment used in New Hampshire's licensure process for physical therapists and physical therapist assistants. It tests whether you know how physical therapy is regulated in New Hampshire, not whether you can practice clinically. Expect questions drawn from the Physical Therapy Practice Act and the board's administrative rules: definitions, scope of practice, licensure pathways, supervision and delegation, direct access and referral requirements, documentation and consent, professional conduct, mandatory reporting, and the board's complaint and disciplinary process. Candidates typically sit it after meeting education and examination requirements, and the board or its testing vendor publishes current procedures, eligibility steps, and scheduling details on its official site. Preparation is different from clinical board prep. Read the statute and rules directly and in full, then work through the sections that map to the exam domains, paying closest attention to supervision ratios, referral and direct-access limits, documentation duties, and reporting obligations, since those are where candidates most often lose points. Use practice questions to test recall of specific statutory language and timeframes rather than general physical therapy knowledge. Confirm every administrative detail - application sequence, testing arrangement, and any current figures - with the official New Hampshire body before you rely on it.

What you'll study

Common questions

About NH PT Juris preparation

What is the New Hampshire PT Jurisprudence Examination actually testing?

New Hampshire law and board rules governing physical therapy practice: scope of practice, licensure requirements, supervision and delegation, direct access and referral, documentation and consent, ethics and mandatory reporting, and the disciplinary process. It is a law-and-rules exam, not a clinical skills or basic science exam.

What is the format of the exam?

It is delivered as multiple-choice questions covering the regulatory domains. The official administering body publishes the current format, question count, and time allowance, so check its site rather than relying on secondhand descriptions, which are often outdated.

How hard is it, and how long should I study?

Candidates with recent clinical training usually find the concepts familiar but the details unforgiving: specific timeframes, supervision requirements, and reporting duties. Most preparation time is best spent reading the statute and rules directly. Two to four weeks of focused reading plus practice questions is a reasonable starting plan.

Can I retake the exam if I fail?

Retake eligibility, waiting periods, and any associated costs are set by the board and its testing vendor and can change. Confirm the current retake policy on the official site before you sit the exam, and build in time in your licensure timeline in case a retake is needed.

In what order should I study the domains?

Start with the Practice Act definitions, scope, and licensure sections, since later topics build on them. Then move to supervision and delegation, direct access and referral, documentation and consent, and professional conduct. Finish with board structure, complaints, discipline, and continuing competence.

What are the most common failure modes?

Studying from clinical knowledge instead of the text of the law, skimming supervision and delegation rules, confusing direct-access limits with unrestricted practice, and ignoring mandatory reporting and documentation duties. Candidates also lose points by relying on summaries of the rules rather than the rules themselves.

Do I need to memorize statute numbers and citations?

Focus on substance: what is permitted, who may do it, under what supervision, and what must be documented or reported. Knowing exact section numbers helps less than understanding the operative requirements and timeframes, which is what the questions generally probe.

Does this exam replace the national physical therapy exam?

No. The jurisprudence exam is a state-specific requirement layered on top of national licensure examination and education requirements. You must satisfy both the national and New Hampshire requirements to be licensed; confirm the exact sequence with the official board.

How do I confirm eligibility, fees, and scheduling?

The official New Hampshire regulatory body and its testing vendor publish current eligibility steps, fees, scheduling, and scoring information. Because these details change, verify them directly on the official site before applying, paying, or scheduling your test date.