Divorced Parents, a Teen's Confidences, and a Subpoena
Dr. Priya Nguyen is a licensed psychologist in Santa Fe. Her client, J, is 15 and has been in therapy for four months. J's parents divorced two years ago and share joint legal custody. J has disclosed cannabis use and one episode of cutting, with a safety plan and no current suicidal intent. J's father, who pays for therapy, emails demanding "the complete file, including everything J told you," because he suspects J is using drugs. J begs Dr. Nguyen not to tell her father. The same week, Dr. Nguyen receives a subpoena from the mother's attorney for all records and a deposition. Dr. Nguyen has no court order limiting either parent's access.
1. How should Dr. Nguyen respond to the father's request for the complete file?
Read the worked answer
She should first obtain and review the custody order. Joint legal custody generally gives both parents authority to consent to treatment and access health information unless the order says otherwise, but it does not require turning over the entire psychotherapy record without thought. She should clarify what the father wants and why, discuss the request with J in an age-appropriate way, and release only what is authorized and clinically appropriate. A treatment summary may satisfy the father's legitimate need while protecting J's confidences more than a complete record would. She should not promise J absolute secrecy. If the parents' rights are unclear or disputed, she should seek clarification from the parents' attorneys or the court before releasing. The decision and rationale should be documented.
2. How should she handle the subpoena?
Read the worked answer
A subpoena is a legal demand, not a patient authorization. She should not ignore it, but she also should not automatically produce the entire file. She should notify J and the parents, contact her malpractice insurer or attorney, and determine whether a protective order or court guidance is needed. She may assert privilege on behalf of the client and release only records the court orders or the patient authorizes. For a deposition, she should prepare with counsel, testify only about relevant material, and avoid speculation. If the parents disagree about release, the court may need to resolve the conflict. The key is to respond timely and professionally while protecting confidentiality.
3. Does the cutting disclosure change the confidentiality analysis?
Read the worked answer
It depends on current risk. A past episode of cutting with a safety plan and no current suicidal intent is a serious clinical issue but does not automatically require breach of confidentiality or a child-abuse report. Dr. Nguyen should reassess risk, review the safety plan, involve J in deciding how to inform the parents, and document the assessment. If J is at imminent risk, she must act to protect her, which may include notifying a parent. If there is suspected abuse or neglect, the mandatory reporting law applies. Otherwise, she should preserve the therapeutic relationship while helping J disclose in a supported way.