KUMAT Nepal flashcards
KUMAT Nepal · Build recall with a focused review session.
32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- OMR sheet shading
- Machine-read answer sheet used in paper-based tests; each item must be shaded fully with a dark pencil or ballpoint, since double marks or erasures can be read as blank or wrong.
- Negative marking expected value
- With four options and one-quarter negative marking, a random guess on a one-mark item yields plus 0.0625 in expectation; with one-third negative marking the expectation is zero.
- Time per item
- Divide total exam minutes by total items. A 100-item paper in 90 minutes allows 54 seconds per item, so any item taking over about two minutes should be flagged and revisited.
- Reading comprehension inference
- A question type asking what the passage implies rather than states directly; the answer must be supported by the text, not by outside knowledge or personal opinion.
- Blood relation diagram
- A tree sketch using plus for male, minus for female, and horizontal lines for siblings or spouses; it converts family-relation word problems into a visual check that avoids errors.
- Data interpretation set
- A table, bar chart, or pie chart followed by several questions; read axis labels and units first, compute only the requested value, and watch for percentage versus percentage-point differences.
- Computer-based review screen
- Interface listing answered, unanswered, and flagged items before final submission; use it to ensure no item is left blank, because unanswered items score as wrong.
- One-word substitution
- English vocabulary item requiring a single word for a phrase, such as a person who speaks many languages (polyglot) or a government by the wealthy (plutocracy).
- Thesis statement
- A single sentence, usually the last of the introduction, that states the essay's central claim and the direction of the argument; everything after it must support or qualify it.
- Claim-evidence-warrant
- The three-part body-paragraph unit: state the claim, supply concrete evidence such as data or example, then explain the warrant, meaning why that evidence proves the claim.
- Concession and rebuttal
- Acknowledging the strongest opposing view, granting what is valid, then limiting or refuting it with a condition or better evidence; this raises the score for analytical depth.
- Hedging language
- Qualifiers such as often, tends to, in most cases, and likely that keep claims accurate and defensible; absolute words like always and never invite easy counterexamples.
- Signposting connectives
- Linking words that show logical relation between sentences: however for contrast, therefore for consequence, moreover for addition, and for instance for illustration.
- Topic sentence
- The first sentence of a body paragraph, naming the single claim that paragraph will develop; reading all topic sentences in order should reveal the essay's full outline.
- Essay time allocation
- For a 30-minute analytical essay, spend about 5 minutes planning, 20 minutes writing, and 5 minutes revising for grammar, word count, and thesis consistency.
- Nepal federal structure
- The 2015 Constitution created seven provinces and 753 local units; citing this structure gives concrete grounding to essays on governance, devolution, or service delivery.
- Counterargument paragraph
- A body paragraph presenting the strongest objection to the thesis before the conclusion; it should concede valid points and then rebut, not merely list opposing views.
- Word count discipline
- Prompts often set a range such as 300 to 500 words; falling far short signals thin analysis, while overshooting signals poor planning, and both can cost marks.
- Group discussion initiation
- Opening the discussion with a definition plus a roadmap of angles; it earns leadership credit only if factually accurate, since a wrong opening damages credibility.
- Building on a point
- Entering a discussion by extending a previous speaker's idea with new evidence or a new dimension, which scores for listening and teamwork rather than repetition.
- Air-time balance
- Aim for three to five substantive contributions in a 10 to 20 minute discussion; dominating the floor or staying silent both lower group-behaviour scores.
- Disagreeing with the argument
- Challenge the reasoning, not the speaker: phrase disagreement as a condition or exception, such as noting that a claim holds in cities but not in rural districts.
- Legitimate floor-taking
- Gaining speaking turn without interrupting mid-sentence, by using a natural pause or naming the previous speaker before adding your point.
- Group discussion summary
- A closing statement of 60 seconds or less capturing two or three main themes and any consensus or unresolved tension; panels often score this separately.
- GD evaluation dimensions
- Panels usually score content knowledge, communication clarity, listening and building, leadership or initiation, and group behaviour as separate criteria rather than one overall impression.
- Nepal GD topic: brain drain
- Youth migration and remittance dependence is a frequent discussion theme; a balanced answer weighs remittance income against skills loss and notes policy responses such as retention incentives.
- STAR method
- Behavioural answer structure: Situation, Task, Action, Result. Keep the account to about 90 seconds and end with a measurable or observable outcome.
- Self-introduction length
- A 60 to 90 second account covering name, academic background, one relevant achievement or interest, and motivation for the programme; reciting the CV wastes the opening.
- Motivation question strategy
- Answer why this course or institution with specifics such as curriculum content, faculty expertise, or career pathway, rather than generic praise of reputation.
- Handling unknown answers
- State honestly that you do not know, then describe how you would find out or what related knowledge you do have; fabricating facts is the highest-risk interview behaviour.
- Interview body language
- Enter when invited, wait to be offered a seat, keep an open posture with visible still hands, and distribute eye contact across all panel members rather than one.
- Questions for the panel
- Prepare one or two specific questions about the programme, such as elective options or practical placements, and close with brief thanks; avoid asking only about results or fees.