Aid to Civil Authority or the Training Commitment
The District Administration Office requests 60 soldiers for five days: security at a religious fair expected to draw 40,000 visitors, plus flood standby for the same period. Your battalion is authorised 800 and holds 560. Of those, 120 are in an eight-week UN pre-deployment training package ahead of a deployment with a fixed date; 180 are committed to border observation posts and a road task; 60 are on leave. That leaves 200 uncommitted. The fairground is 40 minutes by vehicle from the battalion lines. The flood-prone area is 90 minutes away. Your commanding officer asks for a staff assessment by 18:00, and adds one line: 'Do not give me a yes until you have told me what it costs.'
1. Set out who can lawfully approve this support, and what the battalion may and may not decide on its own.
Read the worked answer
Separate three questions that are usually tangled together: legality, availability, conditions.
Legality. A district request is a request, not a tasking. Army support to civil authority in Nepal follows from a government decision and reaches the unit through the defence chain - a district office endorses the requirement upward, and Army Headquarters tasks the unit. The battalion does not acquire a lawful task because a district official telephoned, and it does not refuse one because the CO is busy. The correct product is a staff assessment: what can be given, at what risk, on what conditions. If the routing is unclear, the adjutant confirms it in writing rather than guessing - and the file records who asked, for what, and on whose authority.
Availability. The battalion may state what it can and cannot release; it may not silently strip a committed task to look responsive.
Conditions. The battalion may attach conditions - duration, recall, cost, no draw on the pre-deployment training cohort - and should, because a condition accepted in advance is a much easier conversation than a withdrawal later. Aid to civil authority is a secondary role; the primary role is territorial defence, and the training cohort is a deployment commitment with a fixed date that cannot be backfilled at short notice.
2. Quantify the readiness trade-off and recommend a course.
Read the worked answer
The arithmetic. Held 560 against authorised 800 is 70 per cent manning. Uncommitted: 200. Sending 60 spends 30 per cent of that pool for five days.
The 30 per cent is not the problem. The problem is what remains for a simultaneous flood callout: 140 soldiers, of whom perhaps 100-120 can form a usable sub-unit, with no rotation relief across five days and a 90-minute approach. Two risks follow. First, 60 soldiers standing at a fairground 40 minutes from their vehicles are not a first responder; they are a second wave. Second, if the flood comes on day 2, the CO chooses between abandoning the fair and arriving late at the flood.
Recommendation. If the fairground lies inside or on the edge of the flood-prone area, send 60 but dual-task them: fair security is their primary task and flood first response is their secondary task, with a rehearsed recall and a named duty officer. The same troops then cover both contingencies and no second force has to be found. If the fairground is outside the flood area, send 40 for the fair and hold 20 at two hours' notice, and tell the district office plainly that 40 is the ceiling.
What is not available at any price is the 120 in pre-deployment training. A deployment date is a national commitment; a fair is a five-day task. Rank the obligations before ranking the requests.
3. Name the two conditions you would attach first, and argue why those two rather than others.
Read the worked answer
Condition 1 - a time box with an automatic review. Five days, with a review on day 3 and drawdown beginning unless the requirement is renewed in writing. Reason: a task with no review date becomes a task with no end. The district office's five-day estimate is based on a fair programme, not on the battalion's rotation; the review is the mechanism that stops an emergency measure hardening into a standing commitment nobody re-examines.
Condition 2 - a written recall trigger and a rehearsed two-hour recall to the flood area. Named duty officer, named assembly point, one rehearsal before deployment. Reason: the flood standby is the higher-priority contingency - it is a threat to life, the fair is a threat to order - and a recall plan written on paper at 18:00 is not a plan at 03:00. The rehearsal is the part that gets cut and the part that matters.
Why these two and not cost recovery or ammunition accounting: those are administrative and can be settled afterwards with paperwork. Duration and recall are the two conditions that, if omitted, cannot be recovered once the soldiers are on the ground. A staff assessment that lists eight conditions gets none of them; the CO can carry two into a telephone call.