The Bruise and the Ward Chair: A Domestic Violence Complaint That Must Not Be Settled
At 07:20 a 29-year-old woman comes to the police station with her four-year-old son. She has a fresh bruise on her right forearm and a torn kurta. She says her husband struck her with a cooking-pot lid after she asked where Rs 20,000 of shop money had gone. She does not want to file a case; she wants "counseling" and to go back before evening. Her natal home is three hours away, and she has no money. The station's Women and Children Service Cell has one constable, who is on two days' leave. At 08:00 the ward chair telephones: the husband's family is "respectable", the couple should be reconciled at the ward office, and "no file should be opened". At 09:10 the mother-in-law arrives and says the woman fell from the stairs. The woman has not had a medical examination and no first information has been recorded.
1. Must a case be registered even though the woman says she only wants counseling? Give the legal and practical reasoning.
Read the worked answer
Yes, with a clear distinction between the offence and the victim's preferences.
The offence. Domestic violence is an offence under the Domestic Violence (Offence and Punishment) Act, 2066. A blow from a cooking-pot lid leaving a fresh bruise is not a private quarrel; it is an allegation of a punishable act. The police have a statutory duty to record the first information and proceed.
What her wishes can and cannot do. Her wish for counseling must be heard and respected as a wish. It does not authorise the police to shelve an offence. Under the Act, any attempt at reconciliation is a matter for the court, only where the victim freely consents, and never where there is serious injury or a weapon was used. A settlement brokered at the ward office is not a legal substitute for a case.
The ward chair's call. It is a request, not an instruction. It is recorded, and the legal position is explained politely: the file will be opened because the law requires it.
The mother-in-law's account. It is evidence, recorded in the case diary. It is not a reason to close the complaint; the two accounts are tested, not chosen by seniority.
2. What immediate protective and investigative steps should be taken today?
Read the worked answer
Work in the order of risk, not convenience.
- Record first. Take a written statement in her own words, in a private room, by a trained officer - preferably female. The absence of the Women's Cell constable is not a reason to delay; borrow an officer from another unit or from the district office and note who recorded.
- Preserve evidence. Photograph the injury with consent, note its size, colour and position in the medical form, and arrange an examination at the nearest health facility with her consent. Document the torn kurta.
- Assess risk. A weapon was used and money was disputed. Ask about previous beatings, threats, alcohol, weapons in the house and whether the child was present. Record a simple safety plan.
- Inform her of rights. Right to reside in the shared household, right to interim protection order, access to a service centre and shelter.
- Shelter tonight. With no money and natal home three hours away, she needs a safe place today; contact the service centre or shelter, and record the referral.
- Do not summon the husband for an on-the-spot compromise. That is how a complainant is intimidated into withdrawing.
If arrest becomes necessary, follow the ordinary procedure, with production before the court within 24 hours.
3. How should the inspector handle the pressure from the ward chair and the conflicting version of the mother-in-law?
Read the worked answer
Both are handled on paper, calmly and early.
The ward chair. The inspector calls back and explains that the law requires registration, that any reconciliation can be considered only by the court with the woman's free consent, and that the ward's cooperation would be welcome for shelter and follow-up. The conversation is minuted. The tone should be courteous; the position should not move. An inspector who agrees to "keep the file aside" has created a document problem for himself and a safety problem for her.
The mother-in-law. Her statement is recorded formally, with her signature, and placed in the case diary alongside the woman's. It is not used to dismiss the complaint, and it is not concealed either - a genuine fall defence is for the court to weigh against the medical evidence and the torn clothing.
Why this matters. In domestic violence cases the first 48 hours decide whether a prosecution survives. A file that shows a prompt statement, photographs, a medical report, a shelter referral and a recorded refusal of an informal settlement is far stronger than one that shows a gap and a compromise letter signed under family pressure. The inspector's protection is the same as the woman's: a complete record.