NV Claims Adjuster study materials
NV Claims Adjuster study resources

NV Claims Adjuster: Adjuster Ethics, Licensing, and Unfair Claims Practices

NV Claims Adjuster · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Adjuster Ethics, Licensing, and Unfair Claims Practices

Licensing under NRS 684A

Nevada requires a license to adjust claims for an insurer, for an independent adjusting firm, or as a public adjuster representing the insured. Applications run through the Division of Insurance, with fingerprinting and background review; nonresident adjusters may qualify through reciprocal licensing. Licenses must be renewed, continuing education must be completed, and the Commissioner may suspend, revoke, or fine for cause under NRS 684A.100 - including misrepresentation on an application, commingling claim or premium funds, rebating, and paying commissions to unlicensed persons.

NRS 686A.310 - unfair claim practices

The statute lists conduct that is prohibited whether or not it was intentional. Core examples every adjuster should recognize:

  • Misrepresenting policy provisions or facts material to coverage.
  • Failing to acknowledge and act reasonably promptly on claims communications.
  • Failing to adopt and implement reasonable claim-handling standards.
  • Refusing to pay without a reasonable investigation of the available evidence.
  • Failing to affirm or deny coverage within a reasonable time after completing the investigation.
  • Failing to give a reasonable explanation for a denial.
  • Not attempting a good-faith, prompt, and equitable settlement when liability is clear.
  • Compelling litigation by offering substantially less than the claim is worth.
  • Threatening criminal prosecution or reporting to induce settlement of a civil claim.

The Commissioner may investigate, order corrective action, and impose penalties per violation, in addition to license discipline.

Worked example

An adjuster tells a claimant: “Take $4,000 today or we'll report the suspicious fire to the police.” Reasoning: this is a textbook NRS 686A.310 violation on two grounds - failing to conduct a good-faith settlement evaluation and using the threat of criminal referral to leverage a civil settlement. The correct path is a documented, separate fraud referral and an honest written evaluation of the claim.

Traps that cost marks

Believing the duty of good faith runs only to the insured (Nevada claim-practice rules also protect claimants). Assuming intent is required to violate NRS 686A.310. Ignoring license discipline as a separate consequence from civil bad faith.