The Team Leader Who Wants to Pay a Finder
Dana runs a three-person team under the license of Hudson Valley Partners Realty, a NY brokerage. Her cousin Marcus, who holds no real estate license and never has, has started sending her leads from his job at a moving company. Dana wants to formalize this: she proposes to pay Marcus $500 out of her own commission split for every deal that closes, and to have him hand out her business cards at estimates. Her sponsoring broker, Priya, says the arrangement is fine as long as Marcus is paid by Dana and not by the brokerage, and as long as Marcus never negotiates price. Dana also wants Marcus to post a "just listed" video to the team's Instagram account and to answer DM inquiries with "I'll have Dana call you." One lead Marcus sent is a seller, Mr. Okafor, who asks Marcus what commission the brokerage charges.
1. Is Priya's position - that Dana may pay Marcus from her own split, and that it is fine as long as he never negotiates price - correct under NY license law? Explain the legal issue and what the outcome should be.
Read the worked answer
No. New York's license law prohibits paying compensation for the performance of licensed brokerage activities to anyone who is not a licensed real estate salesperson or broker. The source of the money is irrelevant: a payment from Dana's personal commission split is still a payment for brokerage activity, and Dana (as a licensee) can be disciplined for sharing compensation with an unlicensed person, as can the brokerage that permits the arrangement. "He never negotiates price" does not cure the problem - lead generation and referral of business for compensation is itself treated as brokerage activity in New York.
Correct outcome: Marcus cannot be paid per closing or per referral. He could be hired as a bona fide W-2 employee of the brokerage performing only unlicensed support functions, or he could be licensed and sponsored. Dana should also not let him distribute her cards as if soliciting business on her behalf for pay.
2. Evaluate each of the proposed tasks: (a) handing out Dana's business cards at moving estimates, (b) posting a "just listed" video to the team Instagram, (c) answering DMs with "I'll have Dana call you." Identify which are permissible for an unlicensed person and why.
Read the worked answer
(a) Distributing a licensee's business cards at a moving estimate is borderline-to-impermissible. Handing out cards is passive and generally acceptable for an unlicensed assistant in a purely clerical role, but doing it while soliciting business at a consumer's home - especially for compensation tied to closings - looks like unlicensed solicitation. Safer: no card distribution for pay; cards may be left only as part of a clerical task at the licensee's direction.
(b) Posting a "just listed" video to the team's Instagram is a marketing act on behalf of the brokerage. An unlicensed assistant may perform clerical/administrative social-media posting if the content is prepared and approved by a licensee and the assistant is not exercising judgment about the advertising. If Marcus is choosing what to post or writing listing claims, that crosses the line. Also note the advertising rules: team advertising must identify the brokerage name, and the brokerage (not Marcus) is responsible for the content.
(c) Answering DMs with "I'll have Dana call you" is permissible - it is a scripted, non-substantive response that does not discuss property, terms, or induce the consumer. It becomes a problem if Marcus starts answering questions about the property, price, or availability.
3. Mr. Okafor asks Marcus directly what commission the brokerage charges. What should Marcus say, and what should Dana and Priya have done to prevent this situation?
Read the worked answer
Marcus must not answer. Commission is a negotiable term of the listing agreement and discussing it is a licensed activity. The correct response is a scripted deflection: "I'm not licensed to discuss that - Dana will call you today." He should not guess, quote a range, or say "it's standard."
Prevention: Priya should have (1) declined the paid-referral arrangement outright, (2) documented Marcus's role in writing as clerical only, (3) given him a written script and a clear list of prohibited topics (price, commission, terms, condition, legal/tax questions), and (4) ensured the team's advertising identifies the brokerage. The brokerage bears responsibility for supervising unlicensed personnel, and a written office policy on unlicensed assistants is the practical control.