NYSTCE ASL CST (130) study materials
NYSTCE ASL CST (130) study resources

NYSTCE ASL CST (130): Deaf Culture, Community, and History

NYSTCE ASL CST (130) · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Deaf Culture, Community, and History

Domain 3: Deaf Culture, Community, and History

This domain tests cultural knowledge, not just dates: norms, values, institutions, and the diversity of Deaf communities. Items may ask you to identify an event, interpret a behavior, or recognize audism in a scenario.

Core concepts

'Deaf' (capitalized) refers to cultural identity and shared signed language; 'deaf' refers to audiological status. Deaf Gain frames deafness as a cognitive and cultural advantage, not a deficit. Audism is discrimination or bias favoring hearing norms. Oralism is an educational philosophy that prioritizes speech and lipreading, often suppressing sign language. Collectivism, direct communication, and visual access are cultural values. Name signs are given by community members and can be descriptive or arbitrary.

Historical anchors

1817: the American School for the Deaf opens in Hartford, with Laurent Clerc and Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet. 1864: Gallaudet University is founded. 1880: the Milan Congress endorses oralism, with lasting damage to sign language education. 1960: William Stokoe publishes linguistic analysis of ASL, legitimizing it as a language. 1988: Deaf President Now at Gallaudet leads to the first Deaf president. 1990: the Americans with Disabilities Act becomes law. 2010: the International Congress on the Education of the Deaf repudiates the Milan resolutions.

Diversity

Deaf communities include DeafBlind people (including Protactile users), signers of other national sign languages, oral deaf and hard of hearing people, CODAs, and Deaf people with intersecting racial, ethnic, and gender identities. Avoid treating one experience as universal.

Worked example

A hearing teacher tells a Deaf student, 'You've overcome so much by learning to speak.' The statement sounds kind but frames deafness as a deficit and speech as the goal. A culturally responsive response recognizes the student's signed language and identity, avoids praise for overcoming deafness, and asks what support the student actually wants. Reasoning: the comment reflects audism and the medical model; the alternative affirms Deaf Gain and self-determination.

Traps

Using hearing-impaired as a neutral default; assuming all Deaf people sign ASL; conflating Deaf and hard of hearing; treating name signs as nicknames; reducing Deaf history to a single hero narrative; ignoring DeafBlind and BIPOC Deaf perspectives.