NYSTCE 060 study materials
NYSTCE 060 study resources

The Elopement Data and the 40-Minute Bus Ride

NYSTCE 060 · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Elopement Data and the 40-Minute Bus Ride

Marco is a fifth grader with autism spectrum disorder who has attended his neighborhood elementary school since kindergarten. He reads at a beginning-second-grade level and solves single-digit addition with manipulatives, but he participates in science, art, music, and lunch with nondisabled peers, supported by a 1:1 paraprofessional and visual supports. The IEP team is reconvening because of elopement: three times per week last month, all during hallway transitions and recess. The district's autism specialist recommends a 12:1:1 program in another building 40 minutes away. Marco's mother objects and asks that he stay at his home school. The principal notes the school has no opening in its own self-contained class and says the team must decide at this meeting.

1. Before the team accepts the specialist's recommendation, what must it establish about the current placement and about alternatives?

Read the worked answer

Framework. IDEA presumes the general education classroom is the default; removal is justified only when education there, with supplementary aids and services, cannot be achieved satisfactorily. The team must answer that question with data, not with a specialist's opinion.

1. The data are setting-specific. All three weekly elopements occurred during hallway transitions and recess. That pattern points to a need for support in unstructured settings and unstructured time; it is not evidence that Marco cannot learn in a general education classroom, where he in fact participates in science, art, music, and lunch.

2. Supplementary aids were not exhausted. The team must document which supports were in place and whether they were delivered with fidelity: an adult escort or peer buddy for transitions, a visual schedule with transition warnings, scheduled movement breaks, a structured recess plan, social stories, and reinforcement for staying with the group.

3. Compare the options honestly. The team must consider the full continuum. A 40-minute ride and loss of peer models are costs that must be weighed against any benefit. 'No opening in our self-contained class' is a resource problem, not a least-restrictive-environment finding.

2. What specific information does the team still need, and who should gather it?

Read the worked answer

The decision requires three kinds of data that the referral packet does not currently contain.

  • Descriptive behavior data. Frequency, duration, time of day, antecedent, and consequence for each elopement, collected by the paraprofessional across at least two weeks and across settings (transition, recess, and at least one structured academic period). This tells the team whether the behavior is truly setting-bound.
  • Fidelity and outcome data on existing supports. Did the visual schedule get used every transition? Was the escort present? A special education teacher or behavior specialist should run a brief fidelity check rather than rely on impressions.
  • Information from the proposed setting. Someone on the team should observe the 12:1:1 class and report on its instructional level, peer models, and how it handles transitions. A placement cannot be justified without evidence it will meet the need the current setting is failing to meet.

The parent's observations belong in the record as well; she is the only team member who sees Marco across home and community routines.

3. If the district moves Marco to the 12:1:1 class over his mother's objection, what is his placement status while the dispute is resolved, and what must the district do?

Read the worked answer

Stay-put. Under IDEA's pendency provision, during an administrative or judicial proceeding the student remains in the current educational placement unless the parties agree otherwise or the dispute involves a disciplinary change of placement. Marco's current placement is the home school with the 1:1 paraprofessional and supplementary supports, so that is where he stays while the disagreement is resolved.

Prior written notice. The district must issue written notice describing the action it proposes, the basis for it, and the evaluations and records it relied on, in language the parent can understand, along with a copy of procedural safeguards. Notice is required even when the parent has verbally objected.

Practical judgment. The team should not treat stay-put as a way to do nothing. It should put the transition and recess supports in place immediately, monitor them for four to six weeks, and reconvene with data. If those supports work, the proposed change is unnecessary; if they fail, the district has a documented basis that will survive review. Offering mediation early is usually faster and less adversarial than waiting for a due process filing.