E-Waste, Equity, and a Chromebook Refresh
In a district with 4,200 Chromebooks, a four-year refresh will retire the fleet. About 600 devices still power on; 3% have swelling batteries; the rest are broken or obsolete. The district has budgeted $25,000 for disposal and has a recycler that charges $8 per device for certified data destruction and recycling. A community group asks the technology education department to help plan a public collection event and to make sure low-income families are not asked to pay. Students in a grade 9 technology and society class are assigned to recommend a plan. Constraints: student data must be destroyed before any device leaves campus; usable devices could be refurbished for families, but the district’s insurance and IT staff will not support giving away devices without a warranty; the event must be held on a Saturday with 20 student volunteers. The principal wants a decision memo in one week.
1. Identify the main stakeholders and the social, economic, and environmental trade-offs the class should weigh before recommending reuse, refurbishment, or recycling.
Read the worked answer
Stakeholders include the 4,200 current users and their families, IT staff who carry data-risk responsibility, taxpayers, the recycler, waste workers, and the grade 9 students who must learn to reason about consequences. The class should separate three options. Reuse keeps working devices in service, but only 600 still power on, and the district will not warrant giveaway devices; data destruction and liability must be resolved. Refurbishment can extend access for low-income families, but it needs a certified partner, battery screening, and a warranty or clear disclaimer. Recycling recovers materials but costs $8 per device and destroys remaining embodied value. Environmental trade-offs include avoiding landfill toxins and recovering metals versus transport and processing impacts. Economic trade-offs include the $25,000 budget versus the full $33,600 cost at $8 for 4,200 devices. Social trade-offs include privacy and trust, equity in collection access, and the risk that a free event still imposes transportation or time costs. The 3% swollen-battery estimate (about 126 devices) is a safety issue, not a routine recycling stream; those devices need separate handling. The class should recommend against a single 'recycle everything' answer and use criteria: data safety first, then reuse where liability allows, then recycling.
2. Recommend a specific disposal and reuse plan that stays within the $25,000 budget, and explain how the class should present uncertainty in its data.
Read the worked answer
The arithmetic exposes a gap: 4,200 × $8 = $33,600, which is $8,600 over the $25,000 budget. The class should not hide this. A defensible plan is: (1) screen all 4,200 devices; quarantine approximately 126 with swollen batteries for a hazardous-waste or battery-specialist channel; (2) route up to 600 working devices to an approved refurbisher, with data destruction documented before transfer; (3) recycle the remaining approximately 3,474 devices. At $8 each, step 3 costs about $27,792, still above budget. Therefore the memo should state that the current budget cannot cover the full fleet at the quoted fee and recommend one of three transparent options: negotiate a lower per-unit fee or county subsidy, request a $3,000–$9,000 contingency, or phase collection across two events. The class should present a range, not a false point estimate: battery prevalence may be 2–5%, some devices may be non-repairable, and the recycler fee may change. It should also state what would change the recommendation, such as a free manufacturer take-back program. This is stronger than pretending the budget works.
3. How should the class connect this project to a technology-and-society standard about intended and unintended consequences, without turning the memo into a generic recycling poster?
Read the worked answer
Connect the project to intended and unintended consequences by making students trace specific pathways. Intended: secure data destruction, recovered materials, and access for some families. Unintended: a collection event that requires a car may exclude the families it aims to help; a 'free' recycle event may shift costs to the district; refurbished devices without batteries may fail soon after. Students should identify who bears each consequence and what evidence would reveal it. For data privacy, the indicator is a certificate of destruction and a chain-of-custody log. For equity, the indicator is the share of devices going to families in the lowest-income attendance areas and whether transportation was provided. For environmental impact, the indicator is weight recycled versus landfilled and battery units diverted. The memo should distinguish a consequence that is certain from one that is projected, and it should propose monitoring after the event. This avoids a generic poster because every claim is tied to a decision, a stakeholder, and a measurable check.