Tapu timber on a marae kitchen benchtop
Ngāti Rongomai marae committee has $1,800 to replace a 2.4 m × 0.6 m kitchen benchtop used for preparing kai for up to 120 people at tangihanga. The existing rimu top is 30 years old, has cracks, and black mould is visible along the back edge. A kaumātua offers free tōtara beams salvaged from a wharenui that was demolished in 2019; the timber is tapu. A stainless steel quote is $2,600. A laminate top rated to 80°C costs $900. The kitchen has no extraction fan and the committee cooks six large pots per hui. The committee meets on 12 March and needs the bench installed before a hui on 2 April. Members disagree: one says 'free tōtara is the obvious answer', another says 'we cannot put kai on tapu timber', and a third says 'just buy the laminate and stop wasting time'.
1. Recommend a benchtop solution and justify it against at least three constraints in the setup.
Read the worked answer
Rule out the free tōtara first. The $0 price is not a benefit here: the timber is tapu, and using it for kai would breach the committee's cultural obligations and the kaumātua's advice. That is a constraint money cannot override.
Stainless steel meets food-safety and heat requirements, but at $2,600 it is $800 over budget. Laminate at $900 fits the budget, but its 80°C rating is marginal against six large pots, and without an extraction fan, steam will swell the particleboard edges.
A defensible judgement is a laminate base with a stainless steel hot-zone insert (about 600 mm wide) and sealed edges, quoted as a partial stainless job rather than a full top. Ask the fabricator to confirm the total is under $1,800. If it is not, postpone to the next hui and raise $300; installing a surface that fails within a year is worse than a short delay. Minute the decision and the kaumātua's advice.
2. Explain how the committee should consult with kaumātua and what record they should keep.
Read the worked answer
Consultation is not a single phone call. The committee should take the options-including the tapu tōtara offer-to the kaumātua and whānau at a hui, explain the budget and the food-safety issue, and ask for their view on the timber and the final design. They should ask specifically whether a stainless insert or laminate is acceptable, and whether any karakia or blessing is needed before installation.
The record should include the date, who attended, the options presented, the kaumātua's advice, the decision, and the reasons. That record protects the committee if the decision is questioned later and shows that manaakitanga and kaitiakitanga were considered. It also gives the fabricator clear instructions. If the kaumātua advises against a material, the committee should not proceed without revisiting the decision at a properly notified hui.
3. Describe one check or test that would show the chosen solution is fit for purpose.
Read the worked answer
Before the 2 April hui, boil water in the largest pot used by the kitchen (say 20 L), place it on the stainless insert for 30 minutes, then check the laminate around the insert for lifting, bubbling, or heat discolouration. Also wet the back edge and seams for 10 minutes and check for water ingress. Record the results with photos and a short note.
This test is fit for purpose because it reproduces the two failure modes the old bench showed-heat and moisture-and it tests the joint between materials, which is the weakest point. A pass means no lifting, no swelling, and no discolouration. If it fails, the insert needs a wider stainless margin or a different sealant before the hui.