Pokie funding at Te Rito Food Bank
Te Rito Food Bank serves a town of 15,000. Demand has risen from 250 to 400 households a week in two years. Its annual running costs are $310,000, and reserves are $18,000. The local licensed trust offers $50,000 a year from pokie machine profits. The food bank's volunteers are split: some say refusing the money would leave 150 families without parcels; others say taking gambling money is hypocritical when clients include people harmed by gambling. A Māori health provider reports that pokie losses are concentrated in low-income and Māori communities. The board has one month to decide before the winter demand peak.
1. Explain the values conflict facing the food bank board.
Read the worked answer
The board faces a conflict between compassion and integrity. Accepting the $50,000 would let the food bank keep feeding 150 more families a week during winter, which reflects values of care and practical support. Declining it reflects values of consistency and harm prevention: pokie machines cause the financial harm that brings some clients to the food bank, and Māori and low-income communities bear the losses. Volunteers are split because both values are legitimate. The board also has to consider trust: donors and clients may see pokie money as tainted. This is not a simple right/wrong choice; it is a judgement about which harm is more urgent and whether conditions can reduce complicity.
2. Describe the consequences of accepting and of declining the funding for at least two groups.
Read the worked answer
If the food bank accepts, 150 families may receive parcels, but clients harmed by gambling may feel betrayed, and some volunteers may resign. The licensed trust gains reputational benefit and a say, which could create dependency. If it declines, the food bank may have to cut parcels or use its $18,000 reserves quickly, causing immediate hunger and stress; volunteers who opposed gambling may stay. The trust may redirect the money elsewhere. The board should also consider the signal: accepting may normalise pokie funding in a town with limited options.
3. Recommend a decision with conditions. Justify using evidence and ethical reasoning.
Read the worked answer
Recommend accepting the $50,000 for one winter only, with conditions: no logo on food parcels, no influence over client eligibility, a public statement that the board opposes gambling harm, and a written plan to replace the money within 12 months through council, iwi, and business donors. Justification: the immediate need is urgent, and refusing would harm 150 families. But the board should not become dependent on harmful funding. Conditions reduce complicity and protect trust. If no alternative funding is found by the deadline, the board should revisit the decision rather than renew automatically.