Consent through a family interpreter
Mrs Tupou, 71, Tongan, is admitted to a medical ward with a fractured neck of femur awaiting surgery. She speaks Tongan and limited English. Her daughter, 'Ana, 24, has been interpreting at the bedside, including during the orthopaedic registrar's consent discussion for a hemiarthroplasty. Midway through, the registrar turns to 'Ana and says: 'Just tell her it's a routine operation to fix the hip and the risks are small.' 'Ana looks uncomfortable and glances at the RN. Theatre is booked for 0800 and it is now 2140. Later, another nurse says to the RN in the corridor: 'These families always want to be in on everything. It slows the whole ward down.'
1. What should the RN do in the consent discussion, and what are the limits of her role?
Read the worked answer
Core issue: consent must be informed and given by Mrs Tupou. Right 5 requires effective communication in a form and language she can understand, including an interpreter where necessary and reasonably practicable. Right 6 requires the information a reasonable consumer would need, including the risks. A daughter paraphrasing a minimised version of the operation does not meet either standard, and neither does a consent form signed without understood information (Right 7).
Act in the moment, politely but immediately:
- Suggest pausing: 'Could we stop for a moment - I think we need a proper interpreter for this conversation so Mrs Tupou can ask her own questions.'
- Ask 'Ana whether she is comfortable interpreting for her mother, and acknowledge her position: family members frequently cannot convey frightening information, and should not be asked to.
- Request a professional Tongan interpreter - in-person, or a telephone/video interpreting service if the hospital has one - and reschedule the consent discussion to a time when one is available and Mrs Tupou is not sedated or in pain.
- Confirm capacity and voluntariness: is she alert, oriented, free of coercion, and does she want whānau present? Whānau support is consistent with a collectivist model of care and should be encouraged, but supporting is not the same as speaking for her.
- Use teach-back through the interpreter ('Can you tell me in your own words what will happen tomorrow?') rather than 'Do you understand?'
Limits: the RN does not obtain consent for the operation; that is the registrar's responsibility. Her accountability is to ensure the process is fair, to raise her concern, and to document it. If theatre is delayed, that is a consequence of an unsafe consent process, not a reason to proceed.
2. How should the RN respond to the colleague's remark in the corridor?
Read the worked answer
Respond, briefly and specifically, without a public confrontation. Silence is read as agreement and it shapes what the next student or new graduate on that ward thinks is acceptable.
A workable response: 'I don't think it's about wanting to be in on everything - Mrs Tupou doesn't speak English and can't consent to surgery without someone interpreting. That's the delay, not the family.' Keep it about the clinical requirement and the person, not the colleague's character.
Why it matters beyond the moment:
- The remark frames whānau involvement as an imposition. Under the Code of Conduct, nurses are required to respect consumers' rights and to practise culturally safely; whānau-centred involvement is a legitimate expectation for many Māori and Pacific families, not a management problem.
- Cultural safety is about the power imbalance in the encounter, not about knowing facts about a culture. The nurse's job is to notice when a system is making a family's normal way of caring into a burden.
- If the pattern continues, or if it is made in front of the family or a student, escalate it: charge nurse manager, and if it is a repeated attitude issue, the employer's conduct process.
Also check the system, not only the person: if interpreting is slow, that is a resourcing and workflow issue to raise at the ward level, so that the next family is not penalised for the delay.
3. What should be documented and communicated before 0800?
Read the worked answer
Document the process, not just the outcome. Record the time, who was present, that a family member was being used to interpret, that the RN raised the need for a professional interpreter, and that the consent discussion was deferred pending interpretation. Record Mrs Tupou's own statements and questions in her words as far as possible, her level of alertness and pain at the time, and who was contacted about the theatre booking.
Communicate to the right people, before the trolley arrives:
- Inform the registrar who will be operating, and the anaesthetic team, that consent is not yet validly obtained and why - this is a safety issue for the patient and the organisation, and it must be raised before the patient is sedated, not after.
- Tell the charge nurse manager so theatre can be rebooked or the list reordered, and so the interpreter service is booked for the earliest slot.
- Hand over at shift change with the outstanding action as the headline: 'Consent not complete - interpreter needed.'
Frame it as protecting the patient and the consent process, not as reporting a colleague. A consent form that was explained in a language the patient does not fully understand is a real risk of an invalid consent and of an adverse event; raising it before 0800 is the point of raising it at all.