NZ Scholarship Religious Studies study plan
NZ Scholarship Religious Studies · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Religious Studies
Map the full Religious Studies domain into a one-page concept diagram linking the three strands: religious traditions and their origins, religious language and interpretation, and religion in contemporary society
Define and write working definitions for the core analytical terms the exam rewards: tradition, doctrine, ritual, myth, ethics, secularisation, pluralism, fundamentalism, hermeneutics
Audit your existing knowledge by writing, from memory, a 300-word account of one tradition's foundational narrative and then marking every point you could not justify with a source
Build a personal source log spreadsheet with columns for scholar, work, date, argument, and where you would deploy it
Your checkpoint
A one-page domain concept map plus a 40-term glossary with defensible definitions and a populated source log of at least 15 entries
Religious Studies
Compare two major traditions' foundational narratives side by side, identifying what each claims about revelation, authority, and human nature
Construct arguments for and against the view that religious traditions are best understood as responses to historical contingency rather than to transcendence
Practise writing a thesis statement and a three-line argument skeleton for four unseen essay prompts under 10 minutes each
Identify three scholars whose work you can paraphrase accurately and check each against a primary or reputable secondary source
Your checkpoint
Two comparative tradition profiles (800 words each) plus four timed essay skeletons with explicit thesis statements
Religious Studies
Analyse how religious language functions across analogy, metaphor, symbol, and literal claim, applying each category to a specific doctrinal example
Evaluate the strengths and limits of verificationist and falsificationist critiques of religious language
Draft a sustained argument on whether religious language can be meaningful without committing to the truth of the claims it expresses
Annotate two past essay questions to show what the command word actually demands
Your checkpoint
A 1,200-word analytical essay on religious language with a clear conclusion and at least four cited positions
Religious Studies
Trace how one tradition's ethics derive from its sources of authority, and test whether the derivation is coherent
Compare consequentialist, deontological, and virtue-based readings of a contested religious ethical issue
Rehearse a full essay under exam conditions in 60 minutes and then mark it against a self-authored rubric
Revise the glossary to remove weak entries and add any term you met during writing
Your checkpoint
A timed 60-minute practice essay plus a marked-up rubric self-assessment identifying the two weakest paragraphs
Religious Studies
Examine religion in contemporary society through secularisation theory, rational choice theory, and post-secular accounts, stating each theory's strongest evidence
Assemble New Zealand and Pacific-relevant examples of religious change, pluralism, and public religion with accurate dates and sources
Argue both for and against the claim that religion is being privatised rather than declining
Identify where a scholar's argument is contested and write a one-sentence rebuttal you could deploy in an essay
Your checkpoint
A two-column evidence table of contemporary religion data and examples with at least 20 verified entries and a 500-word synthesis note
Religious Studies
Integrate the three strands by writing an essay that moves from textual or doctrinal analysis to a contemporary application without losing argumentative thread
Practise handling unseen stimulus-free prompts by generating your own framing question before answering
Diagnose your three recurring weaknesses from marked work and design a targeted drill for each
Condense the source log into 10 scholar cards you can recall in 30 seconds each
Your checkpoint
One full-length integrated essay (1,500 words) plus 10 recall-ready scholar cards covering argument, evidence, and counter-position
Religious Studies
Sit two full timed papers back to back and record time spent per section
Mark both papers against the official schedule or a rigorous self-built rubric and quantify where marks were lost
Rewrite the two lowest-scoring answers into model answers without consulting notes
Reduce your glossary and concept map to a single revision sheet you can review in 15 minutes
Your checkpoint
Two completed timed papers with a mark breakdown table and two rewritten model answers
Religious Studies
Rehearse thesis generation for 12 unseen prompts at three minutes each until the process is automatic
Review every scholar card and glossary entry, flagging anything you cannot defend and cutting it
Practise exam-day logistics: question choice, time allocation, and a plan-first habit for every essay
Write a final one-page synthesis of the domain in your own words with no notes
Your checkpoint
A one-page no-notes synthesis of the domain plus 12 timed thesis statements and a final cut revision sheet
Milestones
Week 2: You can explain two traditions' foundational claims and their differences in 10 minutes without notes, and every scholar in your source log is one you can accurately paraphrase
Week 4: You complete a 60-minute essay on religious language or ethics and score it at or above your target band on a rubric covering thesis, argument, evidence, and counter-argument
Week 6: You write an integrated essay that cites at least six scholars accurately and connects a textual or doctrinal point to a contemporary issue in one continuous argument
Week 8: You produce 12 defensible thesis statements in under 36 minutes and can summarise the whole domain from memory in one page with no factual errors