Immersion policy in a kura with mixed home language backgrounds
A Māori-medium kura in a provincial town has 120 students in Years 1–8. About 70% come from homes where little or no Māori is spoken; 30% have at least one parent who is fluent. The board proposes a 'Māori only' rule for the junior school (Years 1–3), including the playground, to strengthen immersion. Some parents object that their children are being punished for speaking English. Teachers report that children frequently code-switch mid-sentence and that some are anxious. The kura has one reo advisor, two fluent kaiako in the junior school, and a budget for four whānau reo classes per year. The board meets next week. You are on the advisory group and must give a written recommendation that addresses both language outcomes and whānau relationships.
1. Advise the board on whether to adopt the 'Māori only' rule as proposed. Your answer must use the specific demographics and constraints.
Read the worked answer
Do not adopt the rule as proposed. The instructional goal is right: Years 1–3 should have strong Māori-medium input, and the 70% of homes with little Māori make the kura the main language source. But a blanket ban that includes the playground and punishes English will likely increase anxiety, especially for children who already code-switch, and it risks turning whānau into opponents. Recommend: Māori-only for instruction in the junior school, with planned translanguaging-for example, a 10-minute end-of-day slot where children can ask questions in English and the teacher recasts in Māori. In the playground, do not punish code-switching; provide bilingual signage and model phrases. Use the four whānau reo classes to build home support, and give the two fluent junior kaiako and the reo advisor time to coach the other staff. Review after two terms with the indicators in the next answer.
2. A teacher says: 'If we let them speak English, they will never learn Māori.' How do you respond, using the 30% figure?
Read the worked answer
The claim is understandable but too absolute. The 30% of children with a fluent parent are an asset, not a threat: they can be language models, and their whānau can support the kura's programme. Research on translanguaging does not say 'let them speak English all day'; it says that using the first language as a planned scaffold can reduce anxiety and support meaning-making in the second language. The key is boundaries: Māori is the default for instruction and routine, English is allowed in defined moments for clarification, and teachers recast rather than shame. If the rule becomes punitive, the 70% may disengage, and the 30% may be resented. A clear, predictable policy is better than a ban that teachers enforce inconsistently.
3. What would you recommend as three measurable indicators of success after one year?
Read the worked answer
Three measurable indicators: (1) instructional time in Māori in Years 1–3, observed over one week, target at least 80% of teacher talk and 100% of routine instructions; (2) whānau participation-at least 40 of the 120 whānau attend at least one reo class or workshop across the year, with a follow-up survey on confidence; (3) student wellbeing and use-teacher-recorded observations of code-switching in structured vs unstructured time, plus a simple student self-report on whether they feel safe speaking Māori. Also track teacher confidence through a short self-assessment before and after coaching. These indicators connect language outcomes to the relationship goals, so the board can see whether the policy is working without waiting for standardised test data.