Manager pressure and conflict of interest in a WoF decision
An inspector employed by a large Auckland inspecting organisation is asked by the branch manager to inspect a 2017 Toyota Hiace that belongs to the manager's brother-in-law. The van is used privately by the brother-in-law's family. It failed a previous WoF at another site for a cracked windscreen and worn front brake discs. The manager says the van is 'family' and asks the inspector to 'use judgement' and issue the WoF because the booking sheet is already paid. The inspector has not inspected the van yet. The organisation's contract with a local community group requires a WoF every six months. The inspector's own WoF authority is current. The van's registration and RUC are current.
1. What should the inspector do about the conflict of interest and the manager's request?
Read the worked answer
The inspector must not let the manager's relationship or the paid booking influence the inspection. The inspector's duty is to NZTA and the VIRM, not to the branch manager. Even if the inspector is not personally related to the owner, the manager has a direct interest, and the request to 'use judgement' is an improper attempt to pre-determine the outcome. The inspector should decline to inspect this vehicle if the manager's involvement creates a real or perceived conflict, and should ask another authorised inspector at the organisation to inspect it independently. If no independent inspector is available, the vehicle should be referred to another inspecting organisation. The inspector should document the request and the reason for stepping aside.
2. If the manager insists that the WoF be issued without a proper inspection, what should the inspector do?
Read the worked answer
The inspector should refuse. Issuing a WoF without carrying out the required inspection, or issuing one contrary to the VIRM, is a serious breach and may be an offence. The inspector should record the manager's instruction in writing, retain the booking and inspection records, and report the matter to the inspecting organisation's compliance manager. If the organisation does not act, the inspector should report it to NZTA. The inspector should not rely on the previous failure being 'minor' or on the community group's contract as a reason to pass the van. The correct sequence is an independent inspection, then a pass or fail based on the evidence.