Scooter Board Lesson With 36 Seventh Graders
A seventh-grade class of 36 students meets in a gym that is 18 by 30 meters. One teacher and one paraprofessional supervise the class. The lesson uses 18 scooter boards, 12 cones, and a tag game. Two students have IEPs: Marcus has ADHD and frequently leaves his area; Elena has an emotional disability and has a behavior intervention plan that includes a break signal. During the previous lesson, two students collided on scooters, one fell, and a parent complained. The paraprofessional often sits with Marcus at the side instead of supporting the whole class. The gym walls have no padding. The class period is 45 minutes, and the gym has one exit door. The teacher wants to keep the activity but make it safe, inclusive, and manageable.
1. Identify the major safety and supervision risks in this lesson and describe routines, rules, and equipment arrangements that would reduce them.
Read the worked answer
The major risks are 36 students in a relatively small gym, only 18 scooters, no wall padding, one exit door, and a tag game that encourages collisions. Half the class would be waiting or moving unpredictably, and the paraprofessional is not positioned to supervise the whole space.
I would use a half-class rotation: 18 students on scooters inside a coned boundary and 18 students on a jump-rope or fitness station. Switch after five minutes. Rules should be concrete: one direction only, no bumping, bottom on the scooter, hands and feet inside the board, and stop on the signal. I would teach and practice the stop signal before play, with a whistle and a frozen pose.
Cones should create a track or a wide loop, not a narrow tag maze. Non-scooter students stay behind a line. The teacher positions at one end and the paraprofessional at the other, both with full view. I would check scooter wheels and the floor before class. If tag requires chasing and collisions, I would replace it with a cone-collection relay that keeps travel in one direction. Wall padding or mats should be placed at the end walls, and the exit door must remain clear.
2. Describe proactive behavior supports for Marcus and Elena, a de-escalation approach, and the appropriate role of the paraprofessional.
Read the worked answer
Proactive supports should be visual and predictable. Post three rules with pictures, pre-correct Marcus before transitions, give him a specific job such as cone monitor, use proximity, and provide a visual timer for each rotation. For Elena, honor the break signal in her behavior intervention plan, identify a quiet corner in advance, and do not block the exit. Give clear choices before problem behavior starts, such as 'scooter first or jump rope first.'
De-escalation should use a calm voice, give personal space, offer two acceptable choices, and avoid arguing or public correction. Staff should follow the behavior plan, document incidents, and communicate with the team afterward. Physical management should follow district policy and training only.
The paraprofessional should support the whole class and give Marcus brief prompts, not sit with him at the side for the entire lesson. Removing him for the whole period is an exclusion decision for the IEP team, not a routine supervision strategy. A scheduled check-in and a reintegration plan would keep Marcus in the activity while maintaining safety.