Pressure to Paper Over Gift Funds, DTI, and Appraisal Issues
A loan originator at a nonbank lender is nine days from closing a $295,000 FHA purchase. The borrower's file shows a $15,000 deposit in a checking account 45 days before application; the source is unexplained. The real estate agent, who has sent the loan originator six referrals this year, texts: “Just get a gift letter from her brother-everyone does it-and we close on time. If this falls apart, I'll move my buyers to the lender down the street.” The processor finds that the borrower's brother did transfer the funds, but the brother says it was a loan to be repaid from the sale of the borrower's old house. The borrower's DTI is 54%, above the lender's 50% FHA overlay. The loan originator considers labeling the $15,000 as a gift, not counting the repayment, and ordering a drive-by appraisal to “support” the value without mentioning repairs visible in photos.
1. Identify the ethical and legal problems with labeling the $15,000 as a gift and ignoring the repayment obligation.
Read the worked answer
Labeling the funds as a gift when the brother says they are a loan would be a misrepresentation on a federally related mortgage application and could constitute fraud. Gift funds must be documented as gifts with no repayment obligation; a loan from a family member must be disclosed, sourced, and included in the borrower's liabilities if repayment is required. The $15,000 repayment obligation would increase the borrower's DTI, which is already 54% against a 50% overlay. The loan originator cannot rely on the agent's “everyone does it” statement or the threat to move referrals. The agent's pressure is not a lawful justification, and the loan originator's duty of candor runs to the lender, the borrower, and the FHA program-not to the referral source.
2. What should the loan originator do about the DTI and the proposed drive-by appraisal?
Read the worked answer
The loan originator should disclose the brother's statement to the lender's underwriter or compliance area, count the $15,000 as a loan if repayment is required, and recalculate DTI. At 54%, the file exceeds the lender's 50% FHA overlay, so the loan cannot close as structured without a legitimate change-such as reducing the loan amount, paying off debts, adding an eligible co-borrower, or documenting acceptable compensating factors if the lender's policy permits. The loan originator should not order a drive-by appraisal designed to avoid noticing visible repairs. Appraisal independence rules and the lender's appraisal policy prohibit influencing or misleading the appraiser. If repairs affect value or eligibility, they must be addressed through the proper appraisal and underwriting process, even if closing is delayed.
3. How should the loan originator handle the agent's referral pressure, and what reporting or documentation steps are appropriate?
Read the worked answer
The loan originator should not trade accurate underwriting for future referrals. The agent's text should be preserved in the file, and the loan originator should respond professionally that the file must be documented accurately and that closing may need to move. The loan originator should escalate the gift-funds discrepancy and the DTI issue to a supervisor or compliance, document the borrower's explanation, and avoid any appraisal coercion. If the agent continues to pressure for inaccurate documentation, the loan originator should report the conduct through the lender's ethics or whistleblower process. State licensing and SAFE Act obligations, as well as UDAAP and fraud risk, make this more than a customer-service decision. The loan originator's license and the lender's FHA eligibility are at stake; the correct answer is to lose the referral rather than falsify the file.