Subpoena for a Minor's Therapy Records in a Custody Dispute
Dr. Sonya L. treats 16-year-old Maya for anxiety and self-harm. Maya's parents are divorced and share legal custody. Maya's father, who has limited involvement, serves Sonya with a subpoena duces tecum for Maya's entire therapy record in connection with a custody modification hearing. Maya's mother signs a consent for release, but Maya begs Sonya not to disclose her self-harm history because she fears her father will use it against her mother. The subpoena is signed by an attorney, not a judge, and does not include a court order. Sonya's records include a prior report of suspected physical abuse by the father that was previously reported to children services. Sonya is unsure whether to release the full record, a summary, or nothing.
1. How should Sonya respond to the subpoena itself? Does the mother's consent authorize full release?
Read the worked answer
Sonya should not release the full record simply because she received a subpoena. A subpoena signed by an attorney is not a court order, and a subpoena does not by itself override psychologist-client privilege. Sonya should assert privilege on Maya's behalf, notify her attorney and the mother, and tell the subpoenaing attorney that she will not produce records without a valid authorization or court order. The mother's consent is important but may not be sufficient because the parents share legal custody and the father is seeking the records in a custody dispute; Sonya should verify the custody order and any limitations on each parent's authority. Even with consent, she should consider Maya's wishes and the risk of harm. She can provide a privilege log and ask the court to review the records in camera before any disclosure. She should calendar the response deadline and avoid ignoring the subpoena.
2. If a court orders release, what should Sonya produce, and how should she handle the prior abuse report?
Read the worked answer
If a court orders release, Sonya should release only what the order requires, not the entire file by default. She can request in camera review, ask for a protective order limiting who may see the records, and propose a summary of treatment rather than raw notes if the court permits. Maya's self-harm history is highly sensitive and may be clinically harmful to disclose, so Sonya should explain that concern to the court and to Maya in an age-appropriate way. The prior abuse report is different from ordinary therapy content: it was already reported to children services, but that does not waive privilege for the therapy record. Sonya should seek legal advice before releasing the report or related notes, because children services and court records may have separate confidentiality rules. She should document what she produced, to whom, and under what authority.
3. What practical and ethical steps should Sonya take before the hearing?
Read the worked answer
She should consult a health-law attorney promptly, verify the custody order, read the subpoena's scope, and notify the mother and Maya's guardian ad litem if one exists. She should discuss with Maya what is happening, without promising absolute secrecy, and document Maya's preferences and Sonya's clinical judgment. She should assert privilege in writing, seek a protective order, and prepare a privilege log. If the court orders disclosure, she should comply narrowly and ask that the records be sealed or limited. She should not release records informally to either parent, and she should not discuss the case with the father's attorney beyond procedural matters without legal advice. The abuse report should be handled separately with counsel. Throughout, she should balance legal compliance, Maya's safety, the therapeutic relationship, and the limits of parental consent in a contested custody matter.