Commingled Deposits and a Blanket "No Children" Policy
Nia is the broker-owner of Prairie Management. She deposits tenant security deposits and monthly rent into the company's operating account, uses deposit money to pay an owner for a roof repair, and once transferred $2,000 to payroll, replacing it eight days later. Her ad reads: "Quiet building-perfect for young professionals; no children; English-speaking tenants preferred." A tenant who uses a wheelchair asks Nia to allow a ramp at the common entrance at the tenant's expense. Nia refuses, saying "we don't modify common areas." A prospect with children asks about a two-bedroom; Nia says, "This building is really better for adults." Nia's trust records consist of bank statements, and she reconciles when she remembers.
1. Identify the trust-account violations and the correct handling of the security deposits.
Read the worked answer
Nia has commingled trust funds with operating money, used deposits for an owner expense, and temporarily converted trust money to payroll. Replacing the $2,000 later does not cure the conversion; the funds were not available for tenants when required.
Correct handling:
- Security deposits and rents held for others belong in a separate trust account, not the operating account.
- Owner funds, tenant deposits, and brokerage commissions must be accounted for separately.
- Nia may not borrow from the trust account for payroll or any other purpose.
- She must keep a ledger by tenant and owner and reconcile the trust account regularly, not "when she remembers."
As broker, Nia is responsible for trust-account compliance. Bank statements alone are not adequate accounting records, and the use of deposits for an owner's roof repair creates both licensing exposure and potential civil liability.
2. Which fair housing problems appear in the ad and Nia's statements?
Read the worked answer
The ad and statements raise familial status and national origin problems:
- "No children" is a familial-status restriction. It is unlawful unless the property qualifies for the narrowly defined housing-for-older-persons exemption, which requires specific occupancy and policy requirements - not just a preference for adults.
- "English-speaking tenants preferred" suggests national-origin discrimination.
- "Perfect for young professionals" and "better for adults" reinforce an exclusionary message and can be evidence of familial-status discrimination.
Nia should stop using the ad and statements, correct the advertising, train staff, and expect possible complaints to HUD or the state licensing authority. A licensee can face discipline for discriminatory advertising and steering even if no applicant formally complains.
3. How should Nia respond to the ramp request?
Read the worked answer
Nia should treat the request as a reasonable accommodation/modification request related to disability. A blanket refusal to modify common areas is not an interactive response.
She should:
- Discuss the tenant's needs and the specific ramp design, safety, and duration.
- Determine whether allowing the modification is reasonable; the tenant has offered to pay, which supports reasonableness.
- Obtain necessary approvals and require restoration if appropriate.
- Document the request, the discussion, and the decision.
Undue hardship or fundamental alteration may justify a denial, but Nia must be able to explain it with facts, not a general policy. Refusing outright because the area is "common" risks a fair-housing complaint and licensing discipline.