OLSAT Level D study materials
OLSAT Level D study resources

Three Musicians, Three Clues, Two Legal Answers

OLSAT Level D · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Three Musicians, Three Clues, Two Legal Answers

In music club, three students - Lea, Omar, and Rina - each play exactly one instrument: flute, drum, or violin. No instrument is played by two students. The teacher writes three clues: (1) Lea does not play the flute. (2) Omar does not play the drum. (3) Rina does not play the violin. Ana submits: Lea on violin, Omar on flute, Rina on drum. Dev submits: Lea on drum, Omar on violin, Rina on flute. The teacher checks both and says each one obeys all three clues. The group must explain how two different answers can both be legal, decide whether the three clues are enough, and name one extra clue that would leave only a single answer. After two minutes the teacher adds her own extra clue: Rina does not play the flute.

1. Check Ana's and Dev's answers against the three clues. Are the clues enough to decide the instruments?

Read the worked answer

Both answers survive; the clues are not enough.

Ana: Lea on violin (not flute ✓), Omar on flute (not drum ✓), Rina on drum (not violin ✓). Dev: Lea on drum (not flute ✓), Omar on violin (not drum ✓), Rina on flute (not violin ✓).

Neither answer repeats an instrument, and each clue is a 'does not' aimed at one student. Three 'does not' clues with three players usually leave more than one arrangement, because each clue removes options without ever nailing one down. Here the clues shrink the possibilities to exactly two survivors, and nothing written on the board chooses between them. A solver who announces one answer as 'the' answer has quietly added a preference that was never given.

2. Name one extra clue that would leave only a single answer, and explain why a clue that repeats an existing clue would not help.

Read the worked answer

Any clue that removes one of the two survivors will do. For example: 'Lea does not play the violin' keeps Dev's answer and rules out Ana's. Or 'Omar does not play the violin' keeps Ana's and rules out Dev's. Both work because the two answers differ in every position - Lea, Omar, and Rina all change instruments between the two proposals.

A clue like 'Omar does not play the drum' would be useless: it is already clue 2, so it removes nothing new. The test of a useful clue is not how confident it sounds but whether it contradicts one of the surviving arrangements. Before writing a clue, list the arrangements that already fit, then ask which of them your new clue rules out. If the answer is 'none,' the clue is decoration.

3. The teacher adds: Rina does not play the flute. Give the final arrangement and show what happens to the other proposal.

Read the worked answer

Final arrangement: Lea on violin, Omar on flute, Rina on drum - Ana's answer.

Dev's answer puts Rina on the flute, so the new clue eliminates it outright. With Dev gone, only Ana's arrangement remains, and it already passed the first three clues, so the puzzle is finished without any further guessing.

A faster route: Rina is not on flute (new clue) and not on violin (clue 3), so Rina is on drum. Then Lea and Omar split flute and violin. Lea is not on flute (clue 1), so Lea is on violin and Omar is on flute. Both routes land in the same place, which is the check a careful solver runs: if two lines of reasoning disagree, one of them misread a clue.