I85PREP
⌘ K
OR Optometry Jurisprudence study materials
OR Optometry Jurisprudence study resources

OR Optometry Jurisprudence practice questions

One question at a time. Build your OR Optometry Jurisprudence understanding.

First 50 of 200 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.

Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.

Question 1Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

Under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683, which of the following is the entity responsible for licensing optometrists in the state?

  1. The Oregon Board of Optometry Correct answer.
  2. The Oregon Medical Board
  3. The Oregon Department of Education
  4. The Oregon Health Authority

Explanation

Chapter 683 establishes the Oregon Board of Optometry as the body that examines, licenses, and regulates optometrists. The Health Authority, Medical Board, and Department of Education handle other areas of state oversight.

Question 2Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

An applicant for an Oregon optometry license must generally satisfy which requirement before licensure?

  1. Submitting a business plan for a proposed practice
  2. Passing an examination recognized by the board and meeting educational requirements Correct answer.
  3. Holding a current Oregon nursing license
  4. Completing a two-year apprenticeship with a licensed optician

Explanation

Chapter 683 conditions licensure on graduation from an accredited optometry program and passing a board-recognized examination. Apprenticeship with an optician, a nursing license, and a business plan are not licensure prerequisites.

Question 3Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

Which statement best describes the scope of practice granted to an Oregon optometrist under Chapter 683?

  1. Examining eyes and prescribing corrective lenses only
  2. Diagnosing and treating conditions of the human eye and related structures Correct answer.
  3. Performing intraocular surgery without restriction
  4. Practicing only within a hospital setting

Explanation

Oregon optometrists are authorized to examine, diagnose, and treat conditions of the eye and related structures, subject to statutory limits. Their scope is not confined to refraction or to hospital settings, and surgery is not unrestricted.

Question 4Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

An optometrist moves from another state to Oregon and wishes to practice. Which approach is consistent with Chapter 683?

  1. Practice immediately and apply for a license within one year
  2. Rely on the out-of-state license because optometry licenses are nationally portable
  3. Begin practicing once a lease for an office is signed
  4. Apply for licensure through the board's established process before practicing Correct answer.

Explanation

A person must hold an Oregon license before practicing optometry in the state. Out-of-state licensure does not automatically authorize practice, and signing a lease or delaying an application does not create authority.

Question 5Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

Which of the following best characterizes the board's disciplinary authority over a licensed optometrist?

  1. The board may only issue written warnings
  2. Discipline requires approval from the Oregon Medical Board
  3. The board may suspend or revoke a license and impose other sanctions for cause Correct answer.
  4. Only a court may revoke an optometry license

Explanation

Chapter 683 authorizes the board to discipline licensees for defined grounds, including suspension, revocation, and other sanctions. The board's authority is not limited to warnings and does not depend on court action or Medical Board approval.

Question 6Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

An optometrist is convicted of a crime involving fraud. Under Chapter 683, how does this most likely affect licensure?

  1. It may constitute grounds for board discipline, including suspension or revocation Correct answer.
  2. It has no effect because the conduct occurred outside practice
  3. It automatically requires a new licensing examination
  4. It is reviewable only by the criminal court

Explanation

Conviction of certain crimes, including fraud, can be a statutory ground for disciplinary action against an optometry license. The board may impose sanctions such as suspension or revocation after its own review.

Question 7Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

Which activity is most clearly outside the lawful scope of an Oregon optometrist?

  1. Fitting contact lenses
  2. Diagnosing glaucoma
  3. Prescribing therapeutic agents for eye conditions as authorized
  4. Performing cataract surgery Correct answer.

Explanation

Cataract surgery is a surgical procedure reserved to physicians and is not within the optometric scope under Chapter 683. Contact lens fitting, glaucoma diagnosis, and authorized therapeutic prescribing are within optometric practice.

Question 8Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

What is the primary purpose of the continuing education requirement for Oregon optometrists?

  1. To satisfy federal accreditation rules
  2. To maintain and update the licensee's professional competence Correct answer.
  3. To replace the initial licensing examination
  4. To generate revenue for the board

Explanation

Continuing education under Chapter 683 is intended to keep licensees current and competent throughout their careers. It is not a revenue device, a federal requirement, or a substitute for initial examination.

Question 9Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

An optometrist wishes to advertise services. Which statement reflects the Chapter 683 approach to advertising?

  1. Only the board may advertise optometric services
  2. Advertising is permitted but must not be false or misleading Correct answer.
  3. All advertising is prohibited
  4. Advertising requires prior board approval of every advertisement

Explanation

Oregon permits optometrists to advertise while prohibiting false, deceptive, or misleading statements. Blanket prohibition and mandatory pre-approval of each advertisement are not the statutory approach.

Question 10Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

A patient asks an Oregon optometrist to release their records. Which principle governs the optometrist's response?

  1. Records may be released only with patient authorization or as otherwise permitted by law Correct answer.
  2. Records may be sold to marketers without consent
  3. Records must always be released to any requesting party
  4. Records may never be released under any circumstance

Explanation

Patient records are confidential and may be disclosed with the patient's authorization or where law otherwise permits or requires. Unlimited release, absolute refusal, and commercial sale without consent are all inconsistent with that framework.

Question 11Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

Which of the following is a recognized ground for disciplinary action against an Oregon optometrist?

  1. Practicing while impaired by alcohol or drugs Correct answer.
  2. Working in a group practice
  3. Accepting insurance reimbursement
  4. Referring a patient to an ophthalmologist

Explanation

Impairment while practicing is a statutory ground for discipline because it endangers patients. Group practice, insurance participation, and appropriate referral are ordinary, lawful activities.

Question 12Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

An optometrist delegates certain tasks to an assistant. Which statement best reflects Chapter 683's approach to delegation?

  1. Delegation is permitted only for tasks consistent with the assistant's training and the law Correct answer.
  2. Any task may be delegated without limits
  3. Assistants may independently diagnose eye disease
  4. Delegation is entirely prohibited

Explanation

Delegation is allowed for tasks that fit the assistant's qualifications and remain within legal limits, with the optometrist retaining responsibility. Unlimited delegation and independent diagnosis by unlicensed assistants are not permitted.

Question 13Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

Which best describes the board's rulemaking role under Chapter 683?

  1. The board sets only fee amounts and nothing else
  2. The board adopts rules to carry out the statute's purposes Correct answer.
  3. The board has no authority to adopt administrative rules
  4. The board may amend the statute without legislative action

Explanation

The board adopts administrative rules to implement and interpret Chapter 683, covering matters such as licensure, practice standards, and discipline. It cannot amend the statute itself, and its rulemaking role is broader than fee-setting.

Question 14Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

An optometrist's license lapses for failure to renew. What is the licensee's status if they continue seeing patients?

  1. They are practicing without a valid license and subject to discipline Correct answer.
  2. They may practice if a colleague supervises them
  3. They may practice because they were once licensed
  4. They may practice for up to six months

Explanation

Practicing on a lapsed license is unlicensed practice and exposes the individual to disciplinary and legal consequences. Prior licensure, a grace period, or supervision does not restore authority to practice.

Question 15Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

Which statement about the composition of the Oregon Board of Optometry is most consistent with Chapter 683?

  1. It includes optometrist members and public members Correct answer.
  2. It is composed entirely of board staff
  3. It consists only of legislators
  4. It consists only of physicians

Explanation

The board is structured to include licensed optometrists as well as public members who represent consumer interests. It is not composed of legislators, physicians, or staff alone.

Question 16Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

An optometrist suspects a colleague is practicing while impaired. What is the most appropriate action under Oregon's regulatory framework?

  1. Confront the colleague publicly in front of patients
  2. Report the concern to the board Correct answer.
  3. Wait until a patient files a complaint
  4. Ignore the situation to avoid conflict

Explanation

Reporting impaired practice to the board protects patients and fulfills professional obligations under the regulatory scheme. Ignoring the issue, public confrontation, and waiting for harm all fall short of that duty.

Question 17Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

Which of the following most accurately reflects the relationship between Chapter 683 and optometric practice standards?

  1. Standards are set exclusively by hospitals
  2. Statutes have no bearing on day-to-day practice
  3. Practice standards are set only by national associations
  4. The statute sets the legal framework and the board fills in detail through rules Correct answer.

Explanation

Chapter 683 provides the statutory framework, and the board elaborates standards through administrative rules. National associations and hospitals may influence practice but do not set Oregon's legal standards.

Question 18Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

An optometrist wants to expand services into a new procedure not clearly addressed in the statute. What is the soundest approach?

  1. Confirm whether the procedure falls within the statutory scope and board rules before offering it Correct answer.
  2. Proceed immediately and inform the board afterward
  3. Ask a colleague in another state for permission
  4. Assume any eye-related procedure is permitted

Explanation

Scope questions should be resolved by reference to Chapter 683 and board rules before offering a service, because practicing outside scope carries disciplinary risk. Proceeding first, assuming broad permission, or relying on another state's rules is unsound.

Question 19Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

Which situation most clearly implicates the statutory prohibition on unprofessional conduct?

  1. Attending a national optometry conference
  2. Falsifying a patient's clinical record Correct answer.
  3. Charging a standard fee for an examination
  4. Declining to accept a particular insurance plan

Explanation

Falsifying clinical records is dishonest and endangers patient care, making it a classic example of unprofessional conduct subject to discipline. Insurance decisions, conference attendance, and customary fees are ordinary professional activities.

Question 20Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

An optometrist is asked to testify about a patient's care in a legal proceeding. Which principle applies?

  1. The optometrist must refuse all subpoenas
  2. Confidentiality is absolute and bars all testimony
  3. Confidentiality may yield to legal process or patient authorization Correct answer.
  4. Testimony requires no legal basis whatsoever

Explanation

Patient confidentiality is important but can be overcome by valid legal process or patient authorization. It is not absolute, and blanket refusal to respond to lawful subpoenas is not the correct approach.

Question 21Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

Which of the following best describes how Oregon treats the sale of optical goods by an optometrist?

  1. Only opticians may ever handle eyewear
  2. Eyewear sales require a separate medical license
  3. Optometrists are prohibited from selling eyewear
  4. Optometrists may dispense eyewear in connection with their practice Correct answer.

Explanation

Optometrists may dispense and sell eyewear as part of their practice. There is no blanket prohibition, opticians are not the only permissible dispensers, and a separate medical license is not required for eyewear sales.

Question 22Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

A licensee fails to respond to a board inquiry during an investigation. How is this best characterized?

  1. It may itself be a ground for discipline Correct answer.
  2. It automatically voids the license without hearing
  3. It is reviewable only by the governor
  4. It is acceptable because licensees may ignore the board

Explanation

Failure to cooperate with a board investigation can independently support discipline. Ignoring the board is not acceptable, automatic license voiding without process is not the rule, and the governor does not review such matters.

Question 23Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

Which of the following is the best example of conduct that would support a finding of gross negligence against an Oregon optometrist?

  1. Documenting a patient encounter thoroughly
  2. Attending a continuing education course
  3. Referring a complex case to a specialist
  4. Repeatedly failing to perform indicated diagnostic testing over time Correct answer.

Explanation

Gross negligence involves a serious departure from the standard of care, such as a pattern of failing to perform indicated testing. Education, referral, and thorough documentation reflect appropriate practice.

Question 24Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

What is the significance of licensure by the Oregon Board of Optometry for a practitioner's legal authority?

  1. It is optional and only affects insurance billing
  2. It applies only to practitioners in Portland
  3. It is the legal prerequisite to practice optometry in Oregon Correct answer.
  4. It replaces the need to follow board rules

Explanation

A valid Oregon license is the legal prerequisite to practice optometry anywhere in the state. It is not optional, is not limited to a city, and does not exempt the licensee from board rules.

Question 25Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

An optometrist wants to use a new diagnostic device that is not addressed in board rules. Which consideration is most relevant?

  1. Whether the manufacturer offers a discount
  2. Whether a colleague in another state uses it
  3. Whether the device's use is consistent with the statutory scope and standard of care Correct answer.
  4. Whether the device is popular nationally

Explanation

The key question is whether the use fits within the statutory scope and meets the applicable standard of care. Popularity, discounts, and out-of-state practice patterns do not determine Oregon authority or competence.

Question 26Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

Under Chapter 683, what must a person generally obtain before holding themselves out as an optometrist in Oregon and offering optometric services?

  1. A permit issued by the local public health authority
  2. A certificate of completion from an opticianry program
  3. A business registration filed with the Secretary of State
  4. A license issued by the Oregon Board of Optometry Correct answer.

Explanation

Chapter 683 makes the Oregon Board of Optometry the licensing authority for optometrists, and practicing or representing oneself as an optometrist without that license is unlawful. Business registration and local permits do not confer clinical authority to practice optometry.

Question 27Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

Which body is responsible for administering the licensing and disciplinary system for optometrists under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683?

  1. The Oregon Board of Optometry Correct answer.
  2. The Oregon Department of Education
  3. The Oregon State Bar
  4. The Oregon Health Authority

Explanation

Chapter 683 establishes the Oregon Board of Optometry as the agency that licenses optometrists and handles discipline. The other listed entities have unrelated statutory missions.

Question 28Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

An applicant for an Oregon optometry license must generally satisfy which requirement before the Board will issue a license?

  1. Joining a professional optometric association
  2. Obtaining a separate federal optometry permit
  3. Owning or leasing a commercial office in Oregon
  4. Passing the examinations and meeting education requirements the Board adopts by rule Correct answer.

Explanation

Licensure under Chapter 683 turns on education, examination, and other qualifications the Board sets through its rules. Property ownership, association membership, and federal permits are not statutory prerequisites.

Question 29Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

How does Chapter 683 generally treat the license to practice optometry for purposes of legal authorization?

  1. It is a form of property that can be sold to another qualified practitioner
  2. It is a permanent right that cannot be suspended once issued
  3. It is a personal privilege granted by the state that authorizes the holder to practice optometry Correct answer.
  4. It is a federal credential that remains valid in any state

Explanation

An Oregon optometry license is a state-granted privilege that authorizes the individual holder to practice, and it remains subject to Board regulation and discipline. It is not transferable property, not a federal credential, and not immune from suspension or revocation.

Question 30Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

Which statement best describes the scope of practice authorized for an Oregon optometrist under Chapter 683?

  1. Performance of any procedure a physician requests without independent judgment
  2. Unrestricted practice of all branches of medicine and surgery
  3. Dispensing of eyeglasses only, with no diagnostic authority
  4. Examination, diagnosis, and treatment of the eye and visual system within limits set by statute and Board rule Correct answer.

Explanation

Chapter 683 defines optometry as examining, diagnosing, and treating conditions of the eye and visual system, subject to statutory limits and Board rules. The scope is neither unlimited medical practice nor dispensing alone.

Question 31Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

An Oregon optometrist's license is subject to renewal. What does Chapter 683 require of a licensee who wishes to keep practicing lawfully?

  1. Renew by obtaining a new license number from the state each cycle
  2. Renew the license as the Board requires and comply with continuing education rules Correct answer.
  3. Renew by transferring the license to a business entity
  4. Renew only after passing the full licensing examination again

Explanation

Continuing practice requires timely renewal and compliance with the Board's continuing education requirements. Reexamination, new license numbers, and entity transfers are not the renewal mechanism.

Question 32Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

Which statement best captures the Board's authority to adopt rules under Chapter 683?

  1. The Board may adopt rules to carry out the purposes of the optometry statutes Correct answer.
  2. The Board may adopt rules governing all health professions in Oregon
  3. The Board may adopt rules only with the approval of a majority of licensed optometrists
  4. The Board may enforce only statutes and has no rulemaking power

Explanation

Chapter 683 delegates rulemaking authority to the Board so it can implement and administer the optometry statutes. That authority is limited to optometry and does not extend to other professions or depend on a licensee vote.

Question 33Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

Under Chapter 683, which conduct most directly supports disciplinary action because it exceeds the lawful scope of optometric practice?

  1. Performing a surgical procedure the statutes and rules do not authorize optometrists to perform Correct answer.
  2. Dispensing contact lenses pursuant to a valid prescription
  3. Referring a patient to an ophthalmologist for a condition beyond optometric management
  4. Documenting a patient's visual acuity and ocular health findings

Explanation

Practicing beyond the scope authorized by Chapter 683 and Board rules is a ground for discipline. Referral, documentation, and lawful dispensing are all within normal optometric practice.

Question 34Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

An optometrist licensed in another state moves to Oregon and wants to see patients immediately. What is the correct approach under Chapter 683?

  1. Practice for up to one year while an Oregon application is pending
  2. Practice only if a local physician supervises the care
  3. Begin practicing while relying on the out-of-state license as reciprocity
  4. Obtain an Oregon license from the Board through its licensure process before practicing Correct answer.

Explanation

Oregon licensure is required to practice optometry in Oregon, and an out-of-state license does not itself authorize practice here. A candidate must apply and be licensed by the Board, though the Board may recognize credentials through its rules.

Question 35Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

An optometrist is the subject of a Board complaint alleging substandard care. Which description best fits the Board's disciplinary process under Chapter 683?

  1. The Board must refer every complaint to a criminal court for prosecution
  2. The Board may impose sanctions only if the patient files a malpractice lawsuit first
  3. The Board may investigate, hold a contested case hearing, and impose sanctions authorized by statute Correct answer.
  4. The Board may act only after a professional association recommends discipline

Explanation

The Board investigates complaints and, when grounds exist, proceeds through a contested case process before imposing authorized sanctions. It does not depend on a malpractice suit or association recommendation, and not every complaint is criminal.

Question 36Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

Which circumstance is most consistent with a lawful ground for Board discipline against an Oregon optometrist?

  1. Declining to accept a particular insurance plan
  2. Completing more continuing education hours than required
  3. Practicing while the license is suspended Correct answer.
  4. Referring a patient for a second opinion

Explanation

Practicing optometry while a license is suspended is unlawful and is a clear basis for discipline. Exceeding education requirements, insurance participation choices, and appropriate referrals are not violations.

Question 37Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

An Oregon optometrist is convicted of driving while impaired. How does Chapter 683 most likely treat this for licensure purposes?

  1. It is relevant only if the conviction is for a traffic infraction
  2. It may serve as a basis for discipline if the Board finds it bears on fitness to practice Correct answer.
  3. It has no possible relevance to licensure because it occurred outside the office
  4. It automatically results in permanent revocation with no hearing

Explanation

Convictions, including those involving impairment, can support discipline when the Board determines they relate to the licensee's fitness or the public's protection. Discipline follows Board process rather than automatic permanent revocation.

Question 38Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

An optometrist wants to prescribe a therapeutic medication for a patient's eye condition. Which statement best reflects Chapter 683?

  1. The optometrist may never prescribe medication under Oregon law
  2. The optometrist may prescribe any drug, including controlled substances, without limit
  3. The optometrist may prescribe only with a pharmacist's co-signature
  4. The optometrist may do so if the statute and Board rules authorize that level of therapeutic practice Correct answer.

Explanation

Oregon optometrists have therapeutic authority to the extent the statutes and Board rules grant it, and the Board's rules set conditions on that authority. The scope is neither zero nor unlimited.

Question 39Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

A patient asks an Oregon optometrist whether the optometrist carries malpractice insurance. Which approach is most consistent with Chapter 683's regulation of professional conduct?

  1. Deflect by claiming the Board prohibits any discussion of insurance
  2. Refuse to answer and end the relationship immediately
  3. State that insurance is carried even if it is not
  4. Answer truthfully and avoid any deceptive or misleading statement about the practice Correct answer.

Explanation

Chapter 683 disciplines deceptive and misleading conduct, so an optometrist should respond honestly rather than misrepresent coverage. Ending care or fabricating coverage is not the appropriate response.

Question 40Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

An optometrist discovers that a former employee has been using the optometrist's name and license number to submit claims. What is the most appropriate response under Oregon law?

  1. Resolve it privately by paying back any amounts without notifying anyone
  2. Post the employee's personal information publicly as a warning
  3. Ignore it because the optometrist is not personally submitting the claims
  4. Report the suspected unlicensed or fraudulent activity to the Board Correct answer.

Explanation

Misuse of a license number implicates unlicensed activity and fraud, which the Board is empowered to investigate. Ignoring the conduct or handling it purely privately leaves the regulatory violation unaddressed, and public exposure of personal information raises its own problems.

Question 41Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

Which factor is most relevant to whether the Board can discipline an Oregon optometrist for conduct occurring outside the direct provision of patient care?

  1. Whether the conduct occurred on a weekday
  2. Whether the conduct relates to the licensee's fitness or poses a risk to the public Correct answer.
  3. Whether the conduct was reported in the local news
  4. Whether the conduct was witnessed by another optometrist

Explanation

Discipline focuses on conduct bearing on fitness to practice and protection of the public, not on timing, witnesses, or publicity. Conduct away from the chair can still support discipline when those interests are implicated.

Question 42Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

An optometrist wants to open a second office and have a trained employee perform refractions. Which consideration is most important under Chapter 683?

  1. Whether the employee has a business license
  2. Whether the Board's rules permit that delegation and what supervision is required Correct answer.
  3. Whether the employee belongs to a union
  4. Whether the second office is in the same county

Explanation

Delegation of clinical tasks is governed by the Board's rules, including any supervision and training requirements. Business licensing, geography, and union membership do not determine whether clinical delegation is lawful.

Question 43Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

Under Chapter 683, which of the following best illustrates a licensee failing to cooperate with the Board during an investigation?

  1. Providing the requested records within the deadline
  2. Ignoring repeated written requests from the Board for records relevant to a complaint Correct answer.
  3. Consulting an attorney about the response
  4. Requesting clarification of the Board's request before responding

Explanation

Failing to respond to lawful Board requests during an investigation can itself be a disciplinary matter. Seeking clarification, obtaining counsel, and timely compliance are all consistent with cooperation.

Question 44Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

An optometrist's patient records are subpoenaed in a civil case. Which principle best guides the optometrist's response under Oregon law?

  1. Comply with lawful process while protecting patient confidentiality as the law requires Correct answer.
  2. Refuse all subpoenas because optometric records are absolutely privileged
  3. Release the records to any party who asks without a subpoena
  4. Destroy the records to protect the patient's privacy

Explanation

The optometrist should respond to lawful legal process while maintaining confidentiality obligations and asserting protections where appropriate. Destroying records or refusing all process is improper, and unrestricted release violates confidentiality.

Question 45Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

An Oregon optometrist is asked by a marketing company to use patient testimonials containing detailed health information in advertisements. What is the soundest approach under Chapter 683?

  1. Use the testimonials but remove only the patients' last names
  2. Decline all advertising because optometrists may not advertise
  3. Use the testimonials because they are true statements from real patients
  4. Obtain proper patient authorization and ensure the advertising is not false or misleading Correct answer.

Explanation

Advertising is permitted, but it must avoid deceptive content and must respect patient confidentiality, which generally requires authorization for disclosure of health information. Removing only surnames does not adequately protect identity.

Question 46Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

A licensee receives a Board notice of proposed discipline and disagrees with the findings. Which option best describes the licensee's position under Chapter 683?

  1. The licensee may contest the matter through the administrative hearing process Correct answer.
  2. The licensee may ignore the notice because it is not a court order
  3. The licensee may appeal directly to the Governor for reversal
  4. The licensee must accept the sanction without any opportunity to respond

Explanation

Board discipline is imposed through an administrative contested case process that gives the licensee notice and an opportunity to respond and seek review. Ignoring the notice or seeking direct executive reversal is not the established path.

Question 47Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

An optometrist begins offering a new laser procedure and argues that Chapter 683 does not expressly prohibit it. Which analysis is most consistent with Oregon's regulatory structure?

  1. The optometrist may proceed if a physician agrees to bill for the service
  2. Only procedures listed by name in the statute may ever be performed
  3. Authority depends on whether the practice falls within the optometric scope defined by statute and rule, not on the absence of an express prohibition Correct answer.
  4. Any procedure not expressly prohibited is automatically within the optometric scope

Explanation

Scope of practice is defined affirmatively by statute and Board rule, so a procedure must fall within that authority rather than merely escaping an express prohibition. Billing arrangements do not expand the legal scope of optometric practice.

Question 48Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

Which scenario most strongly supports a finding of gross negligence against an Oregon optometrist under Chapter 683?

  1. Repeatedly failing to evaluate a patient's acute vision loss over multiple visits despite clear warning signs Correct answer.
  2. Charging a fee that the patient considers too high
  3. Declining to stock a particular brand of contact lens
  4. Scheduling a follow-up visit four weeks after a routine examination

Explanation

Gross negligence involves a serious departure from the standard of care, such as repeatedly overlooking obvious sight-threatening findings. Product choices, fee disputes, and routine scheduling intervals do not approach that threshold.

Question 49Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

An optometrist employed by a retail optical chain is told by management to alter examination findings so more glasses are sold. Which response best reflects Chapter 683 obligations?

  1. Resign quietly without addressing the direction
  2. Comply only if the alteration is small and disclosed verbally
  3. Refuse to falsify findings because doing so would be deceptive and a basis for discipline Correct answer.
  4. Comply because the employer's business judgment controls clinical records

Explanation

Falsifying clinical findings is deceptive conduct that undermines patient care and exposes the licensee to discipline, and the licensee remains professionally responsible regardless of employer pressure. Business direction cannot override that duty, and merely resigning does not address the underlying misconduct.

Question 50Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 683 - Optometrists (scope of practice, licensure, discipline)

A licensee whose Oregon license was revoked for misconduct wants to return to practice years later. Which statement best reflects Chapter 683's framework?

  1. The licensee may resume practice once a former employer vouches for them
  2. The licensee may practice under another optometrist's license number
  3. The license automatically restores itself after a fixed waiting period
  4. The licensee must seek relief through the Board's reinstatement process and demonstrate fitness to resume practice Correct answer.

Explanation

Revocation is not self-curing; a former licensee must pursue reinstatement through the Board and show that the grounds for discipline no longer bar practice. Borrowing another's license number or relying on an employer's endorsement does not restore authority.