ORELA Special Education (NT602) study plan
ORELA Special Education (NT602) · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Special Education
Map the full NT602 domain 1 blueprint into a one-page outline of subareas, weighting each by expected item share and marking the three heaviest subareas for extra time
Define and write plain-language explanations for the foundational legal pillars: IDEA's six principles, Section 504, ADA, and FERPA, plus how each shapes classroom practice
Build a personal glossary of 25 core special education terms (FAPE, LRE, IEP, procedural safeguards, child find, related services) with a one-line definition and a classroom example for each
Complete 30 practice items on foundations and legal/ethical practice, then log every miss with the reason it was missed
Your checkpoint
A one-page domain 1 blueprint outline plus a 25-term glossary with definitions and classroom examples
Special Education
Sequence the special education process end to end, from pre-referral intervention through eligibility, IEP development, placement, annual review, and triennial reevaluation
Distinguish the roles and legal responsibilities of general education teachers, special educators, administrators, related service providers, and families at each stage
Analyze 10 short scenarios involving referral, consent, discipline, or confidentiality and justify the legally correct response in writing
Explain manifestation determination, disciplinary protections, and the 10-day rule without notes
Your checkpoint
A flowchart of the special education process with role annotations and written justifications for 10 legal/ethical scenarios
Special Education
Differentiate the thirteen IDEA disability categories by definition, typical assessment evidence, and common service implications
Compare high-incidence and low-incidence disabilities in terms of instructional planning, accommodations, and least restrictive environment decisions
Match 20 student profiles to the most likely eligibility category and defend each match with at least two pieces of evidence
Identify common misconceptions about disability categories, such as confusing eligibility labels with instructional needs
Your checkpoint
A 13-category comparison chart plus 20 profile-to-category matches with written evidence
Special Education
Deconstruct the components of a legally defensible IEP, including present levels, measurable annual goals, progress monitoring, accommodations, and transition planning
Write three measurable annual goals with baseline, condition, behavior, and criterion for realistic student profiles
Evaluate sample IEP excerpts for compliance and measurable-goal quality, marking each flaw with the specific correction needed
Complete a 40-item timed mixed practice set covering weeks 1 through 4 and review every rationale
Your checkpoint
Three original measurable IEP goals plus a scored compliance review of five IEP excerpts
Special Education
Apply universal design for learning and multi-tiered systems of support by planning instruction across tiers for a single content standard
Select and justify evidence-based instructional strategies for reading, writing, and mathematics, naming the population each strategy best serves
Design five accommodations and five modifications for a given student and explain the legal distinction between them
Sequence explicit instruction, scaffolded practice, and cumulative review into a 30-minute lesson plan
Your checkpoint
A tiered instructional plan for one content standard including accommodations, modifications, and a 30-minute lesson outline
Special Education
Interpret assessment data by distinguishing screening, diagnostic, progress-monitoring, and standardized measures and what decisions each supports
Practice reading norm-referenced score types (standard scores, percentile ranks, stanines) and translate two sample score profiles into plain-language family summaries
Explain curriculum-based measurement and how to graph and respond to a progress-monitoring trend line
Identify assessment bias, testing accommodations, and alternate assessment considerations for students with significant disabilities
Your checkpoint
Two plain-language family score summaries plus a written response plan based on a progress-monitoring trend line
Special Education
Design positive behavioral interventions by conducting a functional behavior assessment and linking hypothesized function to a behavior intervention plan
Plan classroom management systems that prevent behavior through structure, routines, expectations, and reinforcement, and respond to escalation safely
Describe collaborative practices for working with families and colleagues, including culturally responsive communication and conflict de-escalation
Complete a 50-item timed full-length practice test and categorize every miss by domain subarea
Your checkpoint
A complete FBA-to-BIP draft for one scenario plus a categorized error log from the full-length practice test
Special Education
Re-teach the three weakest subareas identified in the error log using targeted review and 20 new practice items per subarea
Build and drill a one-page rapid-review sheet of high-yield facts, legal timelines, and category distinctions
Complete two timed 50-item practice tests and score at or above your target passing threshold on both
Rehearse test-day logistics: pacing, flagging and returning to hard items, and managing fatigue across the testing window
Your checkpoint
A one-page high-yield review sheet plus two scored timed practice tests with a final prioritized gap list
Milestones
Week 2: Explain the full special education process and the legal basis for each stage aloud in under 10 minutes with no notes
Week 4: Score at least 75 percent on the 40-item timed mixed set and write a measurable IEP goal that another educator confirms meets all four required components
Week 6: Translate two score profiles into family-friendly language and correctly identify the instructional response to a flat or declining progress trend line
Week 8: Score at or above your target passing threshold on both timed 50-item practice tests and show a shrinking error log with no repeated subarea misses